Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:32:31.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Daily activity patterns of small mammals in a cerrado area from central Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Emerson Monteiro Vieira  and
Leandro Cláudio Baumgarten
Emerson Monteiro Vieira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP. 13081970, Brazil
Leandro Cláudio Baumgarten
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Zoologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF. 70910–900, Brazil.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the daily activity patterns of four species of small mammals in an area of cerrado habitat in central Brazil. We checked live traps at 3-hour intervals during the night. Bolomys lasiurus and Calomjis tenet (Rodentia, Muridae), two potential competitors, differed significantly in their daily activity patterns. Bolomys lasiurus had peaks during the twilight, whereas C. tener had a more constant activity through the night, with a peak between 2200 and 0100 h. Thalpomys cerradensis (Rodentia, Muridae) was more active immediately after sunset and in the last three hours before sunrise. Thylamys velutinus (Marsupialia, Marmosidae) was strictly nocturnal with greater activity early in the night. Other factors, such as predation pressure or diet, may be important in determining the activity patterns observed in this study.

Resumo

Nós investigamos os padrōes diários de atividade de quatro espécies de pequenos mamíferos em uma área de cerrado no Brasil central. As armadilhas do tipo alçapāo eram revisadas de três em três horas ao longo da noite. Bolomys lasiurus e Calomys tener (Rodentia, Muridae), dois competidores em potencial, diferiram significativamente quanto aos seus ritmos diários de atividade. Bolomys lasiurus apresentou picos ao entardecer e ao amanhecer, enquanto que C. tener apresentou uma atividade mais constante ao longo da noite, com um pico entre 2200 e 0100 h. Thalpomys cerradensis (Rodentia, Muridae) foi mais ativo imediatamente depois do por do sol e nas tres ultimas horas antes do sol nascer. Thylamys velutinus (Marsupialia, Marmosidae) foi exclusivamente noturno, apresehtando uma maior atividade no início da noite. Outros fatores, tais como pressao de predaçāoe preferencias alimentares, podem ser importances para determinar os padrōes de atividade observados neste estudo.

Keywords

activity patternsBolomys lasiurusBrazilCalomys tenercerradosmall mammalsThalpomys cerradensisThylamys velutinus
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 255 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Alho, C. J. R. 1982. Brazilian rodents, their habitats and habits. Pp. 143–166 in Mares, M. A. & Genoways, H. H. (eds). Mammalian biology in South America. Special Publication Series, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburgh, vol. 6. 539 pp.Google Scholar
Alho, C. J. R., Pereira, L. A. & Paula, A. C. 1986. Patterns of habitat utilization by small mammal populations in cerrado biome of Central Brazil. Mammalia 50:447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, P. V. & Fleming, T. H. 1984. Competition in neotropical small mammals. Acta Zoologica Fennica 172:33–36.Google Scholar
Borchert, M. & Hansen, R. L. 1983. Effects of flooding and wildfire on valley side wet campo rodents in central Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 43:229–240.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., Davidson, D. W. & Reichman, O. J. 1979. An experimental study of competition between seed-eating rodents and ants. American Zoologist 19:1129–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerqueira, R., Fernandez, F. A. S. & Quintela, M. F. S. 1990. Mamíferos da restinga de Barra de Maricá, Rio de Janeiro. Papéis Avulsos Zoologia, São Paulo 37:141–157.Google Scholar
Dietz, J. M. 1984. Ecology and social organization of the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. No. 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G. 1978. Delimitation of the cerrado concept. Vegetatio 36:169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkert, H. G. 1982. Ecological aspects of bat activity rhythms. Pp. 201–242 in Kunz, T. H. (ed.). Ecology of bats. Plenum Press, New York. 425 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernest, K. A. & Mares, M. A. 1986. Ecology of Nectomys squamipes, the neotropical water rat, in central Brasil: home range, habitat selection, reproduction and behavior. Journal of Zoology 210:599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, G. B. & Redford, K. R. 1984. The mammals of IBGE's ecological reserve and an analysis of the role of gallery forests in increasing diversity. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 44:517–523.Google Scholar
Goodland, R. 1971. A physiognomic analysis of the ‘cerrado’ vegetation of central Brasil. Journal of Ecology 59:411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P. R. 1972. Interspecific competition among rodents. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, J. G. 1982. Habitat selection and the community matrix of a desert small-mammal fauna. Ecology 63:1400–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1990. The Brazilian rodent genus Thalpomys (Sigmodontinae, Cricetidae) with a description of a new species. Journal of Natural History 24:763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, D. W. & Kaufman, G. A. 1982. Effect of moonlight on activity and microhabitat use by ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). Journal of Mammalogy 63:309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenagy, G. J. 1973. Daily and seasonal patterns of activity and energetics in a heteromyid rodent community. Ecology 54:1201–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, T. H. 1980. Energy budgets of free-living bats. Pp. 369–392 in Wilson, D. E. & Gardner, A. L. (eds). Proceedings of the Fifth International Bat Research Conference. Texas Tech Press, Lubbock. 434 pp.Google Scholar
Lacher, T. E. Jr, Mares, M. A. & Alho, C. J. R. 1989. The structure of a small mammal community in a central Brazilian savanna. Pp. 137–162 in Redford, K. H. & Eisenberg, J. F. (eds). Advances in Neotropical Mammalogy. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville. 614 pp.Google Scholar
Mares, M. A., Braun, J. K. & Gettinger, D. 1989. Observations on the distribution and ecology of the mammals of the cerrado grasslands of central Brazil. Annals of Carnegie Museum 57:293–352.Google Scholar
Marinho-Filho, J. S. & Sazima, I. 1989. Activity patterns of six phyllostomid bat species in southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 49:777–782.Google Scholar
M'Closkey, R. T. 1978. Niche separation and assembly in four species of Sonoran desert rodents. American Naturalist 112:683–694.Google Scholar
M'Closkey, R. T. & Fieldwick, B. 1975. Ecological separation of sympatric rodents (Peromyscus and Microtus). Journal of Mammalogy 56:119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, J. N., Ellis, B. A., Mackee, K. T., Maistegui, J. I. & Childs, J. E. 1991. Habitat associations and relative densities of rodent populations on cultivated areas of central Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 72:470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, J. C. & Brown, J. H. 1981. Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable exclosures. Science 211:510–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. R. & Paradiso, J. L. 1983. Walker's mammals of the world (4th edition). The John Hopkins University Press, London. 1362 pp.Google Scholar
O'Connel, M. A. 1982. Population biology of North and South American grassland rodents: a comparative review. Pp. 165–185 in Mares, M. A. & Genoways, H. H. (eds). Mammalian biology in South America. Special Publication Series, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburgh, vol. 6. 539 pp.Google Scholar
O'Farrell, M. J. 1974. Seasonal activity patterns of rodents in a sagebrush community. Journal of Mammalogy 55:809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. V., Waser, N. M. & Bass, T. A. 1984. Effects of moonlight on microhabitat use by desert rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 65:353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, K. H. & Fonseca, G. A. B. 1986. The role of gallery forests in the zoogeography of the cerrado's non-volant mammalian fauna. Biotropica 18:126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sick, H. 1984. Ornitologia Brasileira. Editora Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. 827 pp.Google Scholar
Stallings, J. R. 1989. Small mammals inventories in an eastern Brazilian park. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 34:153–200.Google Scholar
Vieira, E. M. 1993. Occurrence and prevalence of bot flies, Metacuterebra apicalis (Diptera: Cuterebridae), in rodents of cerrado from central Brazil. Journal of Parasitology 79:792–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira, M. V. 1989. Dinamica de população e variação sazonal de nichos e seleção de microhabitats numa comunidade de roedores de cerrado brasileira. MSc Thesis, Universidade de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B. P. & Subach, A. 1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos 66:237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar