Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-g5k2d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T11:16:23.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upspeak in British English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Abstract

An examination of a novel UK rising tone, with reference to its use in some other Anglophone countries

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradford, Barbara. 1988. Intonation in Context. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, David. 1985. The Communicative Value of Intonation. Discourse Analysis Monograph No. 8. Birmingham: University of Birmingham English Language Research.Google Scholar
Brazil, David.Coulthard, Malcolm & Johns, Catherine. 1980. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 1992. “Linguistic Change in Intonation: The Use of High Rising Terminals in New Zealand English”. In Language Variation and Change, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 77104. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm. 1977. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Garnica, Olga K. 1977. “Some Prosodic and Paralinguistic Features of Speech to Young Children”. In Snow, Catherine E. & Ferguson, Charles A. eds., Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition, pp. 6388. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F.. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English. 2nd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ogle, S. A. & Maidment, J. A.. 1993. “Laryngographic Analysis of Child Directed Speech”, European Journal of Disorders of Communication, Vol. 28 No. 3: pp. 289297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar