Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-zh294 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-14T14:07:55.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Insurance as an Efficiency Device*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Nicholas Barr
Nicholas Barr
Affiliation:
Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Irrespective of views about equity, social insurance has a major efficiency role. Because of technical problems in private markets, neither unemployment nor inflation are risks against which private markets can supply actuarial insurance, and medical insurance cannot cover all risks for all types of individual. The existence of social insurance is therefore supported on the grounds that it does things which private, actuarial insurance would either not do at all or would do inefficiently.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 59 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1970), ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1963), ‘Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care’, American Economic Review, 53, 941–73, reprinted in Diamond and Rothschild (1978).Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. and Micklewright, J. (1985), Unemployment Benefits and Unemployment Duration, London: ST/ICERD, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1980), Lectures in Public Economic, London and New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Barr, N. A. (1987), The Economics of the Welfare State, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, and Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barr, N. A. (1988), The Mirage of Private Unemployment Insurance, London School of Economics, Welfare State Programme, Discussion Paper WSP/34.Google Scholar
Barr, N. A., Glennerster, H. and Le Grand, J. (1988), ‘Improving the National Health Service’, in Resourcing the National Health Service, House of Commons Social Services Committee, Memoranda laid before the Committee, Session 1987–1988, HC 264–IV, London: HMSO; also available as Reform and the National Health Service, London School of Economics, Welfare State Programme, Discussion Paper WSP/32.Google Scholar
Barr, N. A., Glennerster, H. and Le Grand, J., (1989), Working for Patients? The Right Approach?, submitted as evidence to the House of Commons Social Services Committee; also available as London School of Economics, Welfare State Programme, Discussion Paper WSP/40.Google Scholar
Beenstock, M. and Brasse, V. (1986), Insurance for Unemployment, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Brown, L. D. (1983), Politics and Health Care Organization: HMOs as Federal Policy, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. A. and Rothschild, M. (eds) (1978), Uncertainty in Economics: Readings and Exercises, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1960), ‘Why the Government Budget is Too Small in a Democracy’, World Politics, 12, 541–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enthoven, A. C. (1985), Reflections on the Management of the National Health Service: An American Looks at Incentives to Efficiency in Health Services Management in the UK, London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust (a brief precis is contained in The Economist, 22 June 1985, pp. 19–20).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. G. (1986), Challenge to the NHS, London: Institute of Economic Affairs,Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35, 519–30.Google Scholar
Luft, H. C. (1981), Health Maintenance Organizations: Dimensions of Performance, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Manove, M. (1983), ‘Provider Insurance’, Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 489–96.Google Scholar
McLachlan, G. and Maynard, A. K. (eds) (1982), The Public/Private Mix for Health, London: The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
Meade, J. E. (1952), ‘External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation’, Economic Journal, 62, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine Atherton.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. and Reissert, B. (1988), ‘Do Institutions Make a Difference? Financing Systems of Labor Market Policy’, Journal of Public Policy, 8, 125–49.Google Scholar
Spence, M. (1973), ‘Job Market Signalling’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–74, reprinted in Diamond and Rothschild (1978).Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1970), ‘Director's Law of Public Income Redistribution’, journal of Law and Economics, 13, 1–10.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1970), Private Wants, Public Means, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
UK (1988a), The Future of the National Health Service, Fifth Report of the Social Services Committee, Session 1987–1988, HC 613, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
UK (1988b), Resourcing the National Health Service, House of Commons Social Services Committee, Memoranda laid before the Committee, Session 1987–1988, HC 264–IV, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
UK (1989), Working for Patients, Cm 555, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1984), Microeconomic Analysis, 2nd edn, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Wolf, C. (1987), ‘Market and Non-Market Failures: Comparison and Assessment’, Journal of Public Policy, 7, 43–70.Google Scholar
Zeckhauser, R. and Patel, J. (1987), ‘Treasury Bill Futures as Hedges against Inflation Risk’, Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar