Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:24:02.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plans for action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Melvyn A. Goodale*
Affiliation:
CIHR Group on Action and Perception, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, LondonONN6A 5C2, Canadahttp://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/goodale/
A. David Milner*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-TeesTS17 6BH, United Kingdomhttp://psychology.dur.ac.uk/staff/details.asp?name=MILNER

Abstract:

It is our contention that the concept of planning in Glover's model is too broadly defined, encompassing both action/goal selection and the programming of the constituent movements required to acquire the goal. We argue that this monolithic view of planning is untenable on neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and behavioural grounds. The evidence demands instead that a distinction be made between action planning and the specification of the initial kinematic parameters, with the former depending on processing in the ventral stream and the latter on processing in the dorsal stream.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)