Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:05:24.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working with Radiocarbon Dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

H. T. Waterbolk
H. T. Waterbolk
Affiliation:
Biologisch-Archaeologisch Instituut, Groningen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

C-14 datings can not only provide us with estimates of the absolute age of objects or occupation layers, but also, when available in sufficient numbers, with initial and terminal datings for cultural phases, thus defining their duration. The value of this is obvious: differential duration in different areas can at last provide definitive answers to long-disputed questions concerning the direction of cultural movement.

Working with large numbers of C-14 dates is, however, not entirely free of problems. We are, for example, regularly confronted with larger differences between datings expected to be of similar age than can be accounted for by mere statistical error (Vogel, 1969a) or which can be explained by contamination or other simple causes. One can stop at this point and accept a limited testimonial value for C-14 dates (e.g. Steuer and Tempel, 1968), or one can try to go further by calculating average dates, assuming (for the most part incorrectly) that the chance of a date being too young is equal to its chance of being too old (Neustupný, 1968). The danger in this procedure is that one loses sight of the individual character of each determination: in fact one sample is much more securely associated and more closely contemporary with finds of a particular cultural phase than another, and the chance of contamination or admixture is different for each sample.

Another problem is that the number of C-14 dates that one must take into consideration is often so large that they cannot be digested without some form of graphic presentation, and for this there is as yet no uniformity of practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , December 1971 , pp. 15 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bakker, J. A., Vogel, J. C. and Wiślański, T., 1969. ‘TRB and other C14 dates from Poland (c. 4350–1350 BC and 800–900 AD)’, Helinium, 9 (1), 3–27.Google Scholar
Barker, H. and Mackey, J., 1963. ‘British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements IV’, Radiocarbon, 5, 104–8.Google Scholar
Barker, H. and Mackey, J., 1968. ‘British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements V’, Radiocarbon, 10 (1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, H., Burleigh, R. and Meeks, N., 1969. ‘British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements VI,’ Radiocarbon, 11 (2), 278–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, M. M., 1968. ‘Mass spectrometric studies of carbon 13 variations in corn and other grasses’, Radiocarbon, 10 (2), 468–72.Google Scholar
Braidwood, R. J. and Howe, B., 1960. Prehistoric investigations in Iraqi Kurdistan (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, 31). Chicago, 1–184.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. and Griffin, J. B., 1963. ‘University of Michigan radiocarbon dates VIII’, Radiocarbon, 5, 228–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, H., 1969. ‘The value of plant materials for radiocarbon dating’, American Journ. Bot., 56 (7), 723–31.Google Scholar
Kohl, G. and Quitta, H., 1966. ‘Berlin radiocarbon measurements II’, Radiocarbon, 8, 27–45.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L., in print. Radiocarbon dating of the upper palaeolithic sequence at the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne)’. Unesco symposium on environmental changes and the origin of ‘Homo sapiens’. Paris 1969.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E., 1968. ‘Absolute chronology of the neolithic and aeneolithic periods in central and south-eastern Europe I’, Slovenská archeológia, 16 (1), 19–60.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E., 1969. ‘Absolute chronology of the neolithic and aeneolithic periods in central and south-eastern Europe II’, Archeologické rozhledy, 21 (6), 783–810.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E., 1970. ‘A new epoch in radiocarbon dating’, Antiquity, 44 (173), 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nydal, R., Lövseth, K. and Syrstad, O., 1970. ‘Trondheim natural radiocarbon measurements V’, Radiocarbon, 12 (1), 205–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, E. A. and Broecker, W. S., 1959. ‘Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements V’, Radiocarbon, 1, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, J., 1968. ‘La préhistoire Palestinienne’, Supplément au dictionnaire de la Bible, 8, col. 286–446.Google Scholar
Quitta, H., 1967. ‘Radiocarbondaten und die Chronologie des mittel- und südosteuropäischen Neolithikums’, Ausgrabungen und Funde, 12 (3), 115–25.Google Scholar
Rubin, M. and Alexander, C., 1960. ‘U.S. Geological Survey radiocarbon dates V’, Radiocarbon, 2, 129–85.Google Scholar
Steuer, H. and Tempel, W.-D., 1968. ‘Radiocarbon-Daten des mitteleuropaischen Neolithikums und Daten aus dem Gottinger Leinetal’, Göttinger Jahrbuch, 21–8.Google Scholar
Stuckenrath, R. Jr., 1963. ‘University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates VI’, Radiocarbon, 5, 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuckenrath, R. Jr., and Lawn, B., 1969. ‘University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates XI’, Radiocarbon, 11 (1), 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, H. E., 1970. ‘Bristlecone-pine calibration of the radiocarbon time-scale 5200 B.C. to the present’, in Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology (Proc. of the 12th Nobel symposium), Olsson, I. U. (ed.). Stockholm, 303–11.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E., and Strahm, C., 1970. ‘The neolithic of Auvernier, Switzerland’, Antiquity, 44 (174), 91–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, H., 1968. ‘Copenhagen radiocarbon measurements IX’, Radiocarbon, 10 (2), 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. L. and Ehrich, R. W., 1969. ‘Some problems in chronology’, World archaeology, 1 (1), 143–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. C., 1969a. ‘Remarks on the C14 method’, Helinium, 9 (1), 19–26.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., 1969b. ‘The radiocarbon time-scale’, S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull., 24, 83–7.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1963. ‘Groningen radiocarbon dates IV’, Radiocarbon, 5, 163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. C., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1967. ‘Groningen radiocarbon dates VII’, Radiocarbon, 9, 107–55.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1971. ‘Groningen radiocarbon dates X’, Radiocarbon, 13 (in print).Google Scholar
de Vries, H. and Waterbolk, H. T., 1958. ‘Groningen radiocarbon dates III’, Science, 128, 1550–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waals, J. D. van der, 1964. ‘Neolithic disc wheels in the Netherlands’, Palaeohistoria, 10, 103–46.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1956. ‘The radiocarbon age of Jericho’, Antiquity, 30 (120), 195–7.Google Scholar