Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:23:54.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at Sparta: the Roman stoa, 1988–91 Preliminary report, part 1: (b) Hellenistic and Roman pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Donald M. Bailey
Donald M. Bailey*
Affiliation:
British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pottery described comes from areas of the Roman stoa that were selected by the excavators as important. Most groups contained quantities of local tiles, glazed or unglazed, and large numbers of unidentifiable body sherds. The vast majority of the pottery was locally made and is micaceous, normally very micaceous. Its normal colour is orange of various shades, but it can be a light brown; fired in a reducing atmosphere the body is grey, and this can have a grey slip. There was considerable use of black glaze and red-to-brown slip on Laconian vessels, both coarse and fine; black glaze seems to have been in use at Sparta well into the 1st cent. AD. The generally late hellenistic and Roman Laconian vessels from these contexts are largely unknown archaeologically, and dating is thus at a preliminary stage. Very few imports were found, but these represent the main dating criteria. The hellenistic and Roman pottery found in the Roman stoa, limited as it is, can only be regarded as material for the beginning of a corpus of the many local forms of the period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 88 , November 1993 , pp. 221 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Special abbreviations:

Agora v = Robinson, H. S., Excavations at the Athenian Agora, v: Pottery of the Roman Period (Princeton, 1959) Atlante ii Google Scholar = Enciclopedia dell' arte antica: atlante delle forme ceramiche, ii (Rome, 1985)

2 Wace, A. J. B. and Dickins, G., BSA 13 (1906–7), 155–68.Google Scholar

3 Hobling, M. B., BSA 26 (1923–1925), 277–94.Google Scholar

4 Dawkins, AO 18; A. Delt. 29 (1973–4), B 2, pl. 187.

5 Meyer-Schlichtmann, C., Die pergamenische Sigillata aus der Stadtgrabung von Pergamon (Berlin, 1988), pl. 40. 53.Google Scholar

6 Cf. Hayes, J. W. in Atlante ii, pl. 14. 7.Google Scholar

7 Goudineau, C., La Céramique arétine lisse (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar

8 Slane, K. W., Corinth xviii: The Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore, 2: The Roman Pottery and Lamps (Princeton, 1990), 78.Google Scholar

9 Peacock, D. P. S. and Williams, D. F., Amphorae and the Roman Economy (London, 1986).Google Scholar

10 Sciallano, M. and Sibella, P., Amphores: comment les identifier? (Aix-en-Provence, 1991), p. [94].Google Scholar

11 Cf. Atlante ii, pl. 17. 7.

12 Cf. Atlante ii, pl. 11. 19.

13 Cf. Atlante ii, pl. 14. 7; Slane (n. 8), p. 50, no. 94.

14 Slane (n. 8), 50; Agora v, pl. 61, M 31 = Atlante ii, pl. 15. 15 (ESB form 80, c. AD 80–150).

15 Hochuli-Gysel, A., Kleinasiatische glasierte Reliefkeramik (Berne, 1977), pl. 64, I. 3.Google Scholar

16 Meyer-Schlichtmann (n. 5), pl. 13. 175.

17 Riley, J., Libya antiqua, 13–14 (1976–1977), 150.Google Scholar

18 Cf. Blonde, F., Greek Lamps from Thorikos (Gent, 1983), 118–19.Google Scholar

19 Bittel, K. (ed.), Pergamon: gesammelte Aufsätze (Berlin, 1972), 101, fig. 7.Google Scholar

20 Peacock and Williams (n. 9).

21 Rotroff, S. I., Agora xxii: Hellenistic Pottery: Athenian and Imported Moldmade Bowls (Princeton, 1982).Google Scholar

22 Cf. Mayet, F., Les Céramiques à parois fines dans la péninsule ibérique (Paris, 1975), form VI (pl. 11. 81).Google Scholar

23 Grace, V. R., Amphoras and the Ancient Wine Trade (Princeton, 1961 ), fig. 60, left.Google Scholar It comes from a context of the late 1st and the first half of the 2nd cent.: Agora v, pl. 19, M 54.

24 Empereur, J.-Y. and Picon, M., in Amphores romaines et histoire économique: dix ans de recherche (Rome, 1989), 230, fig. 5.Google Scholar

25 Sciallano and Sibella (n. 10), p. [96].

26 Desbat, A. and Picon, M., in Empereur, J.-Y. and Garlan, Y. (eds), Recherches sur les amphores grecques (Paris, 1986), 639, fig. 2. 10.Google Scholar

27 Loeschcke, S., AM 37 (1912), pl. 27. 1Google Scholar; Kenrick, P. M., Excavations at Sidi Khrebish, Benghazi (Berenice), iii. 1: The Fine Pottery (Tripoli, 1985), 258, fig. 47, B 363. 1Google Scholar; Hayes, J. W. in Atlante ii, pl. 16. 16.Google Scholar

28 Loeschcke (n. 27), pl. 27. 15; Hayes, in Atlante ii, pl. 17. 4.Google Scholar

29 Bittel (n. 19), 98, fig. 5.

30 BM GR 1854. 5–91. 7 and GR 1856. 8–26. 409.

31 Agora v, pl. 9, j 1.

32 Hayes, J. W., Late Roman Pottery (London, 1972), 64, fig. 11. 45. 2.Google Scholar

33 Cf. Hayes (n. 32), 92, fig. 14. 2.

34 Perlzweig, J., The Athenian Agora, vii: Lamps of the Roman Period (Princeton, 1961).Google Scholar

35 Slane (n. 8), 86, no. 182.

36 Perlzweig (n. 34), 51–2; Williams, H., Kenchreai, v: The Lamps (Leiden, 1981), 53.Google Scholar