Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:10:27.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Question intonation and sex roles1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Carole Edelsky
Carole Edelsky
Affiliation:
Arizona State Univesity
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to find out if more women than men use rising intonation when they answer questions to which only they have the answer, 154 men and 16 women were approached by either a male or a female interviewer and asked either where they were born or what their favorite color was. Both sexes used straight rising intonation rarely and equally. Women used a rise–fall–rise pattern more than men only when they were approached by a female interviewer. The ‘meaning’ to the speakers themselves of the three contours used is difficult to ascertain since lexical frames provided by some speakers often contradicted the meanings previously attributed to the contours by other writers.

Listeners' associations with the contours were tested with a matched guise tape of three male and three female voices each using each of three contours produced during the interviews (straight fall, straight rise, and rise–fall–rise). Listeners associated simpler rises with more stereotypically feminine attributes; they associated the female voices with feminine attributes regardless of the contour used; and they associated both male and female voices with more stereotypically feminine attributes when the speakers used the straight rise contour. In light of the lack of production evidence in this study to account for the source of these 30 listeners' associations of terminal rises with feminine attributes, some other possibilities are proposed to account for the associational ties. (Sex differences in speech, language attitudes.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , April 1979 , pp. 15 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aronovitch, C. D. (1976). The voice of personality: stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. Journal of Social Psychology 99. 207–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolinger, D. C. (1964). Around the edge of language: Intonation. Harvard Educational Review 34. 282–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brend, R. M. (1972). Male-female intonation patterns in American English. In Rigault, A. & Charbonneau, R. (eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. The Hague: Mouton, 866–70.Google Scholar
Broverman, I., Vogel, S., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F. & Rosenkrantz, P. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues 28 (a). 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B. L. & Crouch, I. (1975). The question of tag questions in women's speech: They don't really use more of them, do they?↓ LinS 4 (3). 289–94.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1974). Evidence for the existence and acquisition of an aspect of communicative competence: Recognition of sex of speaker from linguistic cues — or — knowing how to talk like a lady. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Elyan, O. H. (1977). Sex differences in speech style. Paper presented at 1st European Conference on Sex Role Stereotyping, Department of Applied Psychology,Cardiff, S. Wales,July.Google Scholar
Ginet, S. M. (1974). Intonation in a man's world. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association,Mexico City,November.Google Scholar
Hadding, K. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1973). Are you asking me, telling me, or talking to yourself? Haskins Laboratories: Status Report on Speech Research SR-33. I–II.Google Scholar
Key, M. R. (1975). Male/female language. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. (1973). Actual and perceived sex-linked differences in adverb and adjective usage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,San Diego,December.Google Scholar
Kramer, C., Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (1978). Perspectives on language and communication. Signs 30 (3): 638–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. LinS 2. 45–80.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word 21. 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, R. (1975). Individual differences and the meanings of vocal emotional expression. Journal of Communication 21. 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkrantz, P., Bee, H., Vogel, S., Broverman, I. & Broverman, D. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 21 (3). 287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Uldall, E. (1960). Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Language and Speech 3. 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uldall, E. (1964). Dimensions of meaning in intonation. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., McCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. & Trim, J. L. M. (eds), In honor of David Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, is September, 1961. London: Longmans, Green & Co., Ltd. 271–9.Google Scholar