Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T04:20:06.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Dinitroanaline Herbicides in a Soil Medium on Snap Bean and Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. Esther Struckmeyer ,
L. K. Binning  and
R. G. Harvey
B. Esther Struckmeyer
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
L. K. Binning
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. G. Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anatomical studies determined the effect of 0.8, 1.7, and 3.4 kg/ha of penoxalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine]; AC-92390 (N-sec-butyl-3-4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine); oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide); and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) on the cell structure of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Tenderette’) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Corsoy’]. Cellular abnormalities in the swollen and brittle area of the stem of treated plants included thinnerwalled cells, elongated xylem elements, hypertrophy and hyperplasia of cells, and anomalous rings of vascular tissue in the cortical region. Injury caused by the four herbicides was similar in snap bean and soybean.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 1976 , pp. 366 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bayer, D.E., Foy, C.L., Mallory, T.E., and Cutter, E.G. 1967. Morphological and histological effects of trifluralin on root development. Am. J. Bot. 54:945–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hacskaylo, J. and Amato, V.A. 1968. Effects of trifluralin on roots of corn and cotton. Weed Sci. 16:513–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Harvey, R.G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroanaline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Harvey, R.G. 1973. Relative phytoxicities of dinitroanaline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kust, C.A. and Struckmeyer, B.E. 1971. Effects of trifluralin on growth, nodulation, and anatomy of soybeans. Weed Sci. 19:147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lignowski, E.M. and Scott, E.G. 1971. Trifluralin and root growth. Plant Cell Physiol. 12:901–908.Google Scholar
7. Murray, O.S., Santelmann, P.W., and Greer, H.A.L. 1973. Differential phytoxicity of several dinitroanaline herbicides. Agron. J. 65:34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Schultz, D.P., Funderburk, H.H. Jr., and Negi, N.S. 1968. Effect of trifluralin on growth, morphology and nucleic acid synthesis. Plant Physiol. 43:265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Standifier, L.S. Jr. and Thomas, C.H. 1965. Response of Johnsongrass to soil incorporated trifluralin. Weeds 13:302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar