Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:06:55.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancement of Herbicide Activity with an Isoparaffinic Oil Carrier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. J. Burr
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Indiana 47907
G. F. Warren
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Abstract

Several herbicides were tested in the greenhouse on ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq.), green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.), purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.), and quackgrass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) to determine the degree of enhancement in activity that could be obtained with an isoparaffinic oil carrier applied at 140 L/ha. The enhancement varied with the herbicide and with the species, ranging from 16-fold enhancement with 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine) and 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (dinoseb) on ivyleaf morningglory to no enhancement of atrazine activity on purple nutsedge and quackgrass or (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) activity on quackgrass and ivyleaf morningglory. An oil adjuvant was less effective in enhancing dinoseb and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron) activity than was the isoparaffinic oil carrier. Also, the isoparaffinic oil carrier emulsified in water was less effective than the undiluted oil in enhancing dinoseb activity on green foxtail, even though equal volumes of the isoparaffinic oil were applied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aya, F. O. and Ries, S. K. 1968. Influence of oils on toxicity of amitrole to quackgrass. Weed Sci. 16:288290.Google Scholar
2. Bandeen, J. D. 1969. Wetting agents, oils, are they a plus for atrazine? Crops and Soils 21:15.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, J. L. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Isoparaffinic oil as a carrier for chlorpropham and terbacil. Weed Sci. 18:365372.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.Google Scholar
5. Colby, S. R. 1967. Preemergence and postemergence control of yellow nutsedge with herbicide combinations and oils. Proc. North East. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:307314.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S. and Robbins, W. F. 1962. Weed Control. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 660 p.Google Scholar
7. Holstun, J. T. Jr. and Bingham, S. W. 1960. Several triazines as selective postemergence herbicides in cotton. Weeds 8:187197.Google Scholar
8. Jansen, L. L. 1965. Herbicidal and surfactant properties of long-chain alkylamine salts of 2,4-D in water and oil sprays. Weeds 13:123130.Google Scholar
9. Leonard, O. A. 1958. Studies on absorption and translocation in bean plants. Hilgardia 28:115160.Google Scholar
10. Saunders, R. K. and Lonnecker, W. M. 1967. Physiological aspects of using nonphytotoxic oils with herbicides. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:6273.Google Scholar
11. Smith, C. N. and Nalewaja, J. O. 1967. A study of the uptake and translocation of foliar applied atrazine. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:6061.Google Scholar
12. Strand, O. E. and Behrens, R. 1969. Effect of atrazine-oil combinations on several corn genotypes. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 23:32.Google Scholar
13. Upchurch, R. P., Keaton, J. A., and Cole, H. D. 1969. Response of turkey oak to 2,4,5-T as a function of final formulation oil content. Weed Sci. 17:505509.Google Scholar
14. Wicks, G. A., Burnside, O. C., and Fenster, C. R. 1968. Effect of atrazine and oil on weed control in sorghum across Nebraska in 1968. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 22:14.Google Scholar