Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:03:45.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why there is no obligation to love God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2023

William L. Bell*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
Graham Renz
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

Abstract

The first and greatest commandment according to Jesus, and so the one most central to Christian practice, is the command to love God. We argue that this commandment is best interpreted in aretaic rather than deontic terms. In brief, we argue that there is no obligation to love God. While bad, failure to seek and enjoy a union of love with God is not in violation of any general moral requirement. The core argument is straightforward: relations of intimacy should not be morally imposed upon autonomous beings. We contend that such reasoning applies to human beings' relationship to God. So, even if our ultimate end is to enjoy communion with God, God has no right that human beings seek a relationship with him. If this is correct, then the command to ‘love God’ is not the sort of moral principle that can be supported by threats of hellfire or other forms of coercion.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, MM (1999) Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, C and Nagasawa, Y (2005) I can't make you worship me. Ratio 18, 138144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choo, F (2022) Can a worship-worthy agent command worship? Religious Studies 58, 7995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, J (1992) The suberogatory. Australian Journal of Philosophy 70, 286295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanigan, J (2019) Duty and enforcement. The Journal of Political Philosophy 27, 341362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A (1979) The paradox of punishment. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, 4258.Google Scholar
Husak, D (2016) Does the state have a monopoly to punish crime? In Flanders, C and Hoskins, Z (eds), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law. London: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 97112.Google Scholar
Kershnar, S (2002) The structure of rights forfeiture in the content of culpable wrongdoing. Philosophia 29, 5788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manis, Z (2019) Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God: An Essay on the Problem of Hell. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, JS (1979) Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Miller, C (2008) Divine desire theory and obligation. In Nagasawa, Y and Weilenberg, E (eds), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. New York: Palgrave, pp. 105124.Google Scholar
Morris, C (1991) Punishment and loss of moral standing. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21, 5377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, MJ (1993) Coercion and the hiddenness of God. American Philosophical Quarterly 30, 2738.Google Scholar
Simmons, J (1991) Locke and the right to punish. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, 311349.Google Scholar
Stump, E (2010) Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R (1983) A theodicy of heaven and hell. In Freddoso, AJ (ed.), The Existence and Nature of God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 3754.Google Scholar
Wallace, J (2019) The Moral Nexus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, CH (1999) Gratitude as a virtue. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80, 284300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, CH (2012) The rights forfeiture theory of punishment. Ethics 122, 371393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, CH (2017) Rights Forfeiture and Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar