Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T08:59:15.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arctic environmental cooperation in transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

David Scrivener
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, Keele University, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG

Abstract

The period from September 1996 to September 1998 represented a transition phase in the process of circumpolar Arctic cooperation on environmental protection, which had begun in 1991 with the establishment of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy and had been broadened with the agreement by the eight Arctic governments to create an Arctic Council. The genesis of the Arctic Council had been protracted due to diverging perspectives on various aspects of its functional scope, organisational structure, and funding and on issues of representation. This article discusses the extent to which the conflicts that had dogged the Council's genesis were resolved during its subsequent ‘post-natal’ period preparing for the Council's first ministerial-level meeting in Iqaluit in September 1998.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AEPS. 1996. Report of the Task Force on Sustainable Development and Utilisation and working papers in progress. Ottawa: Indian and Northern Affairs.Google Scholar
AEPS. 1997. Guidelines for environmental impact assessment in the Arctic. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar
AEPS Secretariat. 1996. Strategy for financing of Arctic environmental cooperation (AEPS). Oslo: AEPS Secretariat.Google Scholar
AMAP. 1997. Arctic pollution issues: a state of the Arctic environment report. Oslo: AMAP.Google Scholar
Arctic Council. 1998a. Arctic Council ad referendum rules of procedure. Ottawa: Arctic Council.Google Scholar
Arctic Council. 1998b. Ad referendum Arctic Council terms of reference for a Sustainable Development Programme. Ottawa: Arctic Council.Google Scholar
CAFF. 1996. Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) – strategy and action plan. Trondheim: Directorate for Nature Management (CAFF Habitat Conservation Report 6).Google Scholar
CAFF. 1997. Co-operative strategy for the conservation of biological diversity in the Arctic region. Helsinki: Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic Council. 1996. WWF Arctic Bulletin 4: 45.Google Scholar
Huebert, R. 1998. New directions in circumpolar cooperation: Canada, the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy, and the Arctic Council. Canadian Foreign Policy 5(2): 3757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, H. 1997. The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy and the Arctic Council: a review of United States participation and suggestions for future involvement. Eagle River, Alaska: Huntington Consulting.Google Scholar
ICC. 1996. ICC statement on the Arctic Council Sustainable Development Programme. Ottawa: ICC Canada Office.Google Scholar
Joint communique of the governments of the Arctic countries on the establishment of the Arctic Council. 1996. Ottawa, 19 09 1996.Google Scholar
Leighton, E., and Finnson, A.. 1998. PAME regional programme of action: will it cool the hot spots? WWF Arctic Bulletin 2: 67.Google Scholar
Nilson, H. 1997. Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy: process and organisation, 1991–97. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (Rapport 103).Google Scholar
PAME. 1996. Report to the Third ministerial conference on the protection of the Arctic environment 20–21 March 1996, Inuvik, Canada. Oslo: Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
Progress Report. 1996. Progress report on Arctic sustainable development to the SA(A)O meeting in Oslo 13–16 November 1996: from the chairof the WGSDU, Ambassador Oddmund Graham. Unpublished document. Oslo: WGSDU.Google Scholar
Reimer, C. 1993. Moving toward cooperation: Inuit circumpolar policies and the AEPS. Northern Perspectives 21 (4).Google Scholar
Scrivener, D. 1989. Gorbachev's Murmansk speech: the Soviet initiative and western response. Oslo: Norwegian Atlantic Committee.Google Scholar
Scrivener, D. 1996. Environmental cooperation in the Arctic: from strategy to council. Oslo: Norwegian Atlantic Committee.Google Scholar
Scrivener, D. 1997. What lies ahead? WWF Arctic Bulletin 1: 56.Google Scholar
Staples, L. 1998. Looking back, looking forward: sustainable development for the Arctic. WWF Arctic Bulletin 2: 1415.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M. 1998. The Arctic Council: a study in governmentality. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.Google Scholar
Vanderzwaag, D. 1997. International law and Arctic marine conservation and protection: a slushy, shifting seascape. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 9(2): 303345.Google Scholar
Watt-Cloutier, S., Kunuk, J., and Fenge, T.. 1996. The Arctic Council, sustainable development and Inuit. WWF Arctic Bulletin 4: 78.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1995. The AEPS: looking backward, looking forward. Unpublished essay based on presentations at the Danish–American Greenland Science Conference and the North Calotte Academy, Inari, 05 1995.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1996a. The Arctic Council: marking a new era in international relations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1996b. Arctic governance: meeting challenges of cooperation in the high latitudes. In: Report of the second conference of parliamentarians of the Arctic region, March 13–14, 1996, Yellowknife. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada: 115132.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1996c. Comment in differing views: environmental protection under the Arctic Council. WWF Arctic Bulletin 4: 67.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1997. A Sustainable Development Strategy for the Arctic Council. WWF Arctic Bulletin 1: 67.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. 1998. Creating regimes: Arctic accords and international governance. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar