Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T18:12:41.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on gut ultrastructure and digestive physiology in Cosmocerca ornata (Nematoda: Ascaridida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. Barry Colam
J. Barry Colam
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Leeds, LS2 9JT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Histological, histochemical and ultrastructural methods have been used to study gut structure and digestive physiology in Cosmocerca ornata (Dujardin, 1845). The nematode is parasitic in the small intestine and rectum of Rana temporaria, and feeds solely upon the gut contents of the host, primarily bacteria and cellular debris rather than fluid material.

Only a small buccal capsule is present and no host tissue is ingested. Rigid channels at the tips of the oesophageal radii and a spiral arrangement of the corpus lumen are probably concerned in expressing any fluid in the food while retaining the particulate matter. The latter is then shredded by three large valvular flaps projecting into the lumen of the posterior oesophageal bulb. One gland is present in each sector of the bulb. There is some evidence that two secretions are produced in each subventral sector, an electron-dense one posteriorly which is released into the lumen below the valve flaps, and an electron-lucid one synthesized more anteriorly which is released in the anterior region of the bulb. Only one secretion is produced in the dorsal gland, similar to that in the anterior subventral sector, and which is poured into the lumen of the posterior corpus. The intestine is not differentiated into distinct regions and contains no gland cells. A prominent striated border of microvilli is present, varying from 25 μm in the foregut to 0·5 μm in the hindgut. They have a prominent core composed of minute fibrils and an outer glycocalyx covering.

Digestion is entirely extracellular, bacteria and cellular debris in the ingesta being broken down by a C-esterase present in the oesophageal gland secretions. It is completed by a process of contact digestion with the same enzyme adsorbed on to the glycocalyx. Acid phosphatase, also produced by the oesophageal glands and present on the microvilli, may be concerned in the absorption of the resultant digestion products and any simple solutes in the food made available by host extracellular enzymes. GER and free ribosomes present in the distal regions of the gastrodermis are probably concerned in the assimilation of the absorbed materials into glycogen which is stored in large quantities in the gastrodermis.

This investigation was supported in part by Research Grant AI 06295 of the United States Public Health Service. The final manuscript was prepared during the tenure of a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the British Egg Marketing Board.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , April 1971 , pp. 259 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackert, J. E. & Whitlock, J. H. (1935). Studies on ascarid nutrition. Journal of Parasitology 21, 428.Google Scholar
Ackert, J. E., Whitlock, J. H. & Freeman, A. E. (1940). The food of the fowl nematode, Ascaridia lineata (Schneider). Journal of Parasitology 26, 17–32.Google Scholar
Andreassen, J. (1968). Fine structure of the intestine of the nematodes, Ancylostoma caninum and Phocanema decipiens. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 318–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, V. W. & Peterson, C. H. (1930). Roentgen diagnosis of ascariasis. Journal of the American Medical Association 95, 1819–21.Google Scholar
Beckett, Evely & Boothroyd, B. (1961 a). The ultrastructure of the ‘cilia-like’ processes in the midgut of Trichinella spiralis larvae. Proceedings of the European Regional Conference on Electron Microscopy, 2, 938–41.Google Scholar
Beckett, Evely & Boothroyd, B. (1961 b). Some observations on the fine structure of the mature larva of the nematode Trichinella spiralis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 55, 116–24.Google Scholar
Browne, H. G. & Chowdhury, A. B. (1959). The ultrastructure of the intestinal wall of Ancylostoma caninum. Journal of Parasitology 45, 241–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, H. G., Chowdhury, A. B. & Lipscombe, L. (1965). Further studies on the ultrastructure and histochemistry of the intestinal wall of Ancylostoma caninum. Journal of Parasitology 51, 385–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, R. G. (1966 a). The fine structure of the intestine and hindgut of the larva of Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology 56, 359–65.Google Scholar
Bruce, R. G. (1966 b). The fine structure of the alimentary tract of Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology 56, 1P.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, Mary. F. P. (1952). The digestive enzymes of Ascaris lumbricoides var suis; their properties and distribution in the alimentary canal. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. & Chitwood, M. B. (1950). An Introduction to Nematology (revised edition). Part I. Baltimore: Monumental Printing Co.Google Scholar
Colam, J. B. (1968). Some observations on the nutrition of four species of nematode. Parasitology 58, 3P.Google Scholar
Colam, J. B. (1969). Histochemical, biochemical and ultrastructural studies on certain species of Nematoda, with special reference to their nutrition. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Colam, J. B. (1970 a). Studies on gut ultrastructure and digestive physiology in Rhabdias bufonis and R. sphaerocephala (Nematoda: Rhabditida). Parasitology 62, 247–58.Google Scholar
Colam, J. B. (1970 b). Studies on gut ultrastructure and digestive physiology in Cyathostoma lari (Nematoda: Strongylida). Parasitology 62, 273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, K. G. (1964). The food of Ascaris. Canadian Journal of Zoology 42, 1160–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doncaster, C. C. (1962). Nematode feeding mechanisms. 1. Observations on Rhabditis and Pelodera. Nematologica 8, 313–20.Google Scholar
Garin, C. (1913). Recherches physiologiques sur la fixation et le mode de nutrition de quelques nématodes parasites du tube digestif de l'homme et des animaux. Annales de l'Université de Lyon, I. Sciences, Médecine 34, 1–160.Google Scholar
Hobson, A. D. (1948). The physiology and cultivation in artificial media of nematodes parasitic in the alimentary tract of animals. Parasitology 38, 183–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, T. (1965). Histochemical and electron microscope studies on Trichuris suis. Parasitology 55, 22–3.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. B. & Colam, J. B. (1970). Gut structure, digestive physiology and food storage in Pontonema vulgaris (Nematoda: Enoplida). Journal of Zoology, London 161, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyon, L. & Collin, J. P. (1962). Ultrastructure de la membrane de l'intestin d'Ascaris du cheval (Parascaris equorum Goetze). Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de biologie 156, 651–4.Google Scholar
Kessel, R. G., Prestage, J. J., Sekhon, S. S., Smalley, R. L. & Beams, W. H. (1961). Cytological studies on the intestinal epithelial cells of Ascaris lumbricoides suum. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 80, 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khatoon, N. (1968). Ultrastructural observations on Cosmocerca ornata. Proceedings of the British Society for Parasitology, Spring Meeting, Leeds.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1962 a). The distribution of esterase enzymes in Ascaris lumbricoides. Parasitology 52, 241–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1962 b). The histochemical localization of leucine aminopeptidase in Ascaris lumbricoides. Parasitology 52, 533–6.Google Scholar
Li, H-C. (1933 a). Parasitic nematodes: studies on their intestinal contents. I. The feeding of the dog ascaris, Toxocara canis (Werner, 1782). II. The presence of bacteria. Lingnan Science Journal 12, 33–41 (supplement).Google Scholar
Li, H-C. (1933 b). Feeding experiments on representatives of the Ascaroidea and Oxyuroidea. Chinese Medical Journal 47, 1336–52.Google Scholar
Mcnabb, J. D. & Sandborn, E. (1964). Filaments in the microvillous border of intestinal cells. Journal of Cell Biology 22, 701–4.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. (1967). Fine structure of the striated border of the intestinal cells of Ancylostoma caninum. Journal of Parasitology 53, 94–9.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, T. M. & Williams, A. W. (1967). A comparative study of the ultrastructure of the microvilli in the epithelium of small and large intestine of mice. Journal of Cell Biology 34, 447–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, J. F. (1928). Studies on the physiology of Ascaris lumbricoides. Science, New York 67, 590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearse, A. G. E. (1961). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied. Second edition. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1940). Digestion in parasitic nematodes. I. The digestion of carbohydrates. Journal of Helminthology 18, 183–92.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1941 a). Digestion in parasitic nematodes. II. The digestion of fats. Journal of Helminthology 19, 35–46.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1941 b). Digestion in parasitic nematodes. III. The digestion of proteins. Journal of Helminthology 19, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P. & Lazarus, Marian (1949). The uptake of radioactive phosphorus from host tissues and fluids by nematode parasites. Parasitology 39, 245–50.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1921). Effects of secretions of certain parasitic nematodes on coagulation of the blood. Journal of Parasitology 7, 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffield, H. G. (1964). Electron microscope studies on the intestinal epithelium of Ascaris suum. Journal of Parasitology 50, 365–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weatherley, N. F., Hansen, M. F. & Moser, H. C. (1964). Distribution of C-14 in Ascaridia galli and the host chicken, given radioactive alanine or glucose. American Journal of Veterinary Research 25, 1206–9.Google Scholar