Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:29:09.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on Bilharziasis amongst the Egyptian Expeditionary Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Philip Manson-Bahr  and
N. Hamilton Fairley
Philip Manson-Bahr
Affiliation:
Brevet-Major, R.A.M.C., Lecturer London School of Tropical Medicine, and Assistant Physician, Albert Dock Hospital, E.
N. Hamilton Fairley
Affiliation:
Pathologist, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Research, Melbourne, late Pathologist 14th Australian General Hospital, and Lecturer on Parasitology Egyptian University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1851, Bilharz (1852) first discovered paired adult trematode worms originally named after him in the portal system of an Egyptian fellah. Subsequently, investigations of the deposits of ova in excreta were made, but numerous attempts by Cobbold, Sonsino, Lortet and Vialleton (1894) and others, to unravel the life history of the parasite, failed. Looss (1896), appreciating that the digenetic trematodes must necessarily pass through a molluscan intermediary, dissected many species of snails collected from the fresh-water canals around Cairo. He failed to find the cercariae of bilharzia, and discarded the hypothesis of an intermediate molluscan host. As, however, the miracidium of Schistosomum haematobium contained germinal cells within its body cavity, it must, naturally, he argued, have been destined to produce sporocysts at some stage of its life cycle. In view of this, Looss evolved the hypothesis that man acted simultaneously as the intermediary, as well as the definitive host of this parasite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1920 , pp. 33 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, J. G. (1916). Med. Journ. S. Africa, xi. 156.Google Scholar
Bilharz, T. (1852). Bin Beitrag zur Helminthographia humana nebst Bemerkungen von Prof. C. Th. von Siebold. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. iv. 53.Google Scholar
Bour, E. F. (1913). Notes sur la Bilharziose. Bull. Soc. Méd. de l'ile Maurice, 2nd ser. xxxi. 22.Google Scholar
Cawston, F. G. (1915). (a) Bilharziasis in Natal S. Africa. Med. Rec. (June 12) xiii. 160–161.Google Scholar
Cawston, F. G. (1915). (b) Bilharziasis. Lancet (Dec. 25), ii. 1427. Jl. Trop. Med. and Hyg. (Nov. 15) xviii. 257–258 (1916). Med. Journ. S. Africa (June), ii. 197 (1917). (July) xii. (?) 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cort, W. W. (xii. 1914). Journ. of Parasitol. i. 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cort, W. W. (12. 1917) Med. Rec. iv. 49–57.Google Scholar
Edgar, (1913). Journ. State Med. xxi. 542–553.Google Scholar
Elgood, Mrs (31. 10. 1908). Bilharziasis amongst women and girls in Egypt. Brit. Med. Journ. ii. 1355.Google Scholar
Faust, (iv. 1918). Journ. of Parasitol. x. 311–319.Google Scholar
Faust, (05. 1919). Journ. of Parasitol. 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, J. D. F. (iv. 1918). Parasilol. x. 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iturbe, T. (30. 04. 1917). Gaz. Med. de Caracas, xxiv. 70.Google Scholar
Katsurada, F. (31. xii. 1913). Centralbl. f. Bakt. I. Abt., Orig. lxxiii. 363–379.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. (1915). Report on the Results of the Bilharzia Mission in Egypt. Journ. Roy Army Med. Corps (July), xxv. 1–55; (Aug.) 147–192, with 17 figs.; (Sept.) 253–267, with figs.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. (1916). Report on Bilharzia Mission in Egypt, 1915. Pt. 4. Egyptian Mollusca. Journ. Roy Army Med. Corps (Aug.) xxvii. 171–190, with 30 figs., and xxx. 235.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. (18. iii. 1916). On the relation between the Terminal and Lateral spined eggs of Bilharzia. Brit. Med. Journ. i. 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiper, R. T. and Atkinson, E. L. (30. i. 1915). Observations on the spread of Asiatic Schistosomiasis, with a note on Katayama nosophora by S. C. Robson, Brit. Med. Journ. i. 201–203, with 1 plate and 1 fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liston, W. G. and Soparkar, M. B. (iv. 1918). Bilharziasis amongst animals in India. Life-cycle of Schistosomum spindalis. Indian Journ. Med. Research v. 567.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1896). Recherches sur la faune parasitaire de l'egypte, pt. 1. Inst. Egyptien, 2, 64, 158–166, 204–210. Pl xiii. figs. 140–145.Google Scholar
Lortet, and Vialleton, (1894). Étude sur le Bilharzia haematobia et la Bilharziose. Ann. Univ. Lyons, ix. 1–118.Google Scholar
Lutz, (10 and 17. iii. 1917). Brazil Medico, xxxi. 81–82; 89–90.Google Scholar
McCallan, A. F. (1915). Urinary Bilharziasis in Upper Egypt. Report on Ankyhtstomiasis Survey. Assiut Prov.Google Scholar
Manson, (1903). Tropical Diseases, 3rd Edition.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Y. (2. x. 1912). Centralb. f. Bakt. I. Abt, Orig. lxvi. 406–416.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Y. (1. iii. 1913). Centralb. f. Bakt. lxviii. 204–206.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Y. (23. v. 1913). Centralb. f. Bakt. lxix. 132–142.Google Scholar
Miyairi, K. and Suzuki, M. (1915). Der Zwischenwirt des Sch. japonicum Katsurada. Mitt. a. d. Med. Fak. d. K. Univ. Kyushu Fukuoka, 1914, i. 187–197, with 2 plates.Google Scholar
Ogata, B. (1914). Verh. der Japan. Path. Gesellsch. Tokyo, xlv.Google Scholar
Sambon, (16. ix. 1907). Journ. Trop Med. and Hyg.Google Scholar
Sonsino, (1895). Monitore Zool. Ital. Firenze, vi. 124.Google Scholar