Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T19:04:14.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regeneration in Argas persicus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Edward Hindle
Affiliation:
(From the Quick Laboratory, Cambridge.)
Norman Cunliffe
Affiliation:
(From the Quick Laboratory, Cambridge.)

Extract

The present investigation was primarily undertaken by Mr G. Merriman at the suggestion of Professor Nuttall, but was discontinued at a very early stage owing to Mr Merriman's departure for Africa. The object of the investigation was:

(1) To determine if immature stages of ticks whose mouth-parts have been mutilated or torn off by the forcible removal of the parasite from the host possess the power of regeneration. In nature, many immature ticks must be injured in this manner, and it seemed of interest to determine if they could regenerate the lost parts, thus helping them in the struggle for existence.

(2) To determine if the small legs occasionally observed in nymphal and adult ticks are due to mechanical injury followed by regeneration. A very striking example of such a tick is the type specimen of Amblyomma scaevola Oudemanns (♂), in which four legs are markedly under-developed. In the large quantity of tick material that has been received at the Quick Laboratory, individuals with one or more miniature legs have been observed repeatedly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banks, J. (1829). Ann. Mag., iv. 430.Google Scholar
Barfurth, D. (1894). Die Experimentelle Regeneration überschüssiger Gliedmassenteile bei den Amphibien. Arch. f. Entwickelungs-Mechanik, i. 91116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, C. (1745). Traité d'insectologie. Part II. Paris.Google Scholar
Bordage, E. (1898). Sur la régénération tétramérique du tarse des Phasmides. Bull. Soc. Entomol. France. 07 13, 1898.Google Scholar
Brindley, H. H. (1897). On the Regeneration of the Legs in the Blattidae. Proc. Zool. Soc., pp. 903916, 1897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesch, H. (1897). Studien über das Regulationsvermögen der Organismen. I. Von den Regulationen Wachstums- und Differenzierungsfähigkeiten der Tubularia. Arch. f. Entwickelungs-Mechanik, v. 389418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, P. (1906). Regeneration der Beine und Autotomie bei Spinnen. Arch. f. Entwickelungs-Mechanik xx. 469506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giard, A. (1897). Sur les régénérations hypotypiques. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol., iv. 315317.Google Scholar
Goebel, K. (1898). Organographie der Pflanzen. I. Allgemeine Organographie. Jena.Google Scholar
Heineken, C. (18281829). Experiments and Observations on the Casting off and Reproduction of the Legs in Crabs and Spiders. Zool. Journal, iv.Google Scholar
Lepeletier, M. (1812). Extrait d'une Mémoire sur les Araignées. Nouv. Bull. Sci. Soc. Philomat. Paris, iii. 248.Google Scholar
Loer, J. (1895). Bemerkungen über Regeneration. Arch. f. Entwickelungs-Mechanik, ii. 250256.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. H. (1901). Regeneration. Columbia University Biological Series, vii. New York.Google Scholar
Müller, , Fritz, (1880). Haeckel's Biogenetische Grundgesetz bei der Neubildung verlorener Glieder. Kosmos, viii.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F., Warburton, C., Cooper, W. F. and Robinson, L. E. (1908). Ticks, a Monograph of the Ixodoidea. Part I. Argasidae. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1880). Stoff und Form der Pflanzenorgane. Arb. d. bot. Inst. Würzburg, ii.Google Scholar
Schultz, E. (1898). Über die Regeneration von Spinnenfüssen. Trav. Soc. Nat. Pétersb. xxix.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (1887). La régénération des organes perdus chez les Araignées. Bull. Soc. Imp. Natural. Moscow.Google Scholar
Weismann, A. (1897). Regeneration: Facts and Interpretation. Natural Science. 04, 1897.Google Scholar