Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T10:50:20.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weakly nonlinear theory of fast steady-state magnetic reconnection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. Jardine  and
E. R. Priest
M. Jardine
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, Scotland
E. R. Priest
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A family of models for fast steady-state reconnection has recently been presented by Priest and Forbes, of which the Petschek-like and Sonnerup-like solutions are special cases. This essentially linear treatment involves expanding about a uniform flow and field in powers of the external Alfvén Mach number Me, and hence is valid for small values of that parameter. To lowest order, the discrete slow-mode compressions attached to the diffusion region are straight, while downstream of them the plasma flows at simply the external Alfvén speed vAe and the field lines are straight. Here we present an extension of these solutions to the next order, which not only reveals that the wave itself is curved (as are the downstream magnetic field lines), but also that the downstream solution is sensitive to changes in the upstream boundary conditions. In the downstream solution there is a free parameter, which may be specified as a downstream boundary condition. Thus the boundary conditions at both the inflow and the outflow boundaries are crucial in determining the nature of the reconnection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , August 1988 , pp. 143 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Biskamp, D. 1986 Phys. Fluids, 29, 1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. G. & Priest, E. R. 1987 Rev. Geophys. 25, 1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, M. & Priest, E. R. 1988 a Reverse currents in fast magnetic reconnection. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. (In press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, M. & Priest, E. R. 1988 b Global energetics of fast magnetic reconnection J. Plasma Phys. (To be published.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, A. & Taniuti, T. 1964 Non-Linear Wave Propagation. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1963 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 8, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petschek, H. E. 1964 AAS-NASA Symposium on the Physics of Solar Flares, NASA Spec. Publ., SP-50, pp. 425–439.Google Scholar
Priest, E. R. & Forbes, T. G. 1986 J. Geophys. Res. 91, 5579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnerup, B. U. O. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnerup, B. U. O. 1988 On the theory of steady-state reconnection. Comp. Phys. Commun. (In press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnerup, B. U. O. & Priest, E. R. 1975 J. Plasma Phys. 14, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soward, A. M. & Priest, E. R. 1977 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A284, 369.Google Scholar
Soward, A. M. & Priest, E. R. 1986 J. Plasma Phys. 35, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, P. A. 1958 Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (ed. Lehnert, B.), pp. 123–134. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ugai, M. 1987 Phys. Fluids, 30, 2163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasyliunas, V. M. 1975 Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 13, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, T. & Axford, W. I. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar