Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T14:13:33.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An audit into the incidence of handicap after unilateral radical neck dissection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

G. R. Shone*
Affiliation:
Cardiff
M. P. J. Yardley
Affiliation:
Cardiff
*
Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW.

Abstract

Forty-six patients who had undergone a radical neck dissection more than six months previously were assessed to determine the degree of handicap that results from division of the accessory nerve. Employment problems, amount of pain, and social and recreational difficulties were assessed. Forty-six per cent of those in employment prior to their operation gave up their work specifically because of problems with their shoulder; this affected more manual than non-manual workers (11 out of 20 manual compared with zero out of four non-manual). Thirty per cent complained of moderately severe or severe pain related to the shoulder. The amount of pain could not be correlated with age, sex, side of operation in relation to handedness, physical build of the patient, or whether the patient had been treated with radiotherapy. Although this is the largest study to address this question since that of Ewing and Martin in 1952, the small numbers involved mean that if any such correlation exists then it may not have become apparent. In view of this incidence of pain and occupational handicap, we feel that efforts should be made to preserve accessory nerve function in cases where surgical clearance of the tumour field is not compromised as a result.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carenfelt, C., Eliasson, K. (1981) Radical neck dissection and permanent sequelae associated with spinal accessory nerve injuries. Acta Otolaryngologica, 91: 155160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, M. R., Martin, H. (1952) Disability following radical neck dissection. Cancer, 5: 873883.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leipzig, B., Suen, J., English, J. L., Barnes, J., Hooper, M. (1983) Functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. American Journal of Surgery, 146: 526530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nahum, A. M., Mullally, W., Marmor, L. (1961) A syndrome resulting from radical neck dissection. Archives of Otolaryngology, 74: 8286.Google ScholarPubMed
Short, S. O., Kaplan, J. N., Laramore, G. E., Cummings, C. W. (1984) Shoulder pain after neck dissection with or without preservation of the spinal accessory nerve. American Journal of Surgery, 148: 478482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed