Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:32:38.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Droplet pair interactions in a shock-wave flow field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. Temkin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. 08854, USA
G. Z. Ecker
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. 08854, USA Present address: Ministry of Defense, Haifa, Israel.

Abstract

Binary interactions between water droplets of nearly equal size in the flow field behind a weak shock wave were studied experimentally. The droplets had diameters of about 270 mm, and the Reynolds numbers, based on this diameter and on the relative velocity between the droplets and the free stream, ranged from about 130 to about 600. In this paper we report only data for Re < 150, corresponding to non-deforming droplets. The droplets in a given pair were aligned so that each pair fell on a plane parallel to the direction of the incoming flow. In this manner, the second droplet in the pair was ‘behind’ the first, at horizontal distances ranging from 1.5 to 11 diameters, and at vertical distances from the dividing streamline ranging from −3 to 6 diameters. We have quantified the interaction in terms of drag force changes on the droplets, and show that the first, or upstream, droplet is not affected by the second, but that the second experiences significant reductions for vertical distances of about one droplet diameter or less. At the smallest horizontal distances, the maximum decrease observed was about 50%, relative to its isolated value. We also show that the drag changes clearly demarcate a wake behind the first droplet. Further, on the basis of these changes, we define a region of influence attached to the first droplet, where the free-stream velocity is significantly reduced. For the droplets used in this study, this region is a slender paraboloid of revolution, having a length of about 15 diameters and a radius of about one diameter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dreyfuss, D. & Temkin, S., 1983 Charge separation during rupture of small water droplets in transient flows: Shock tube measurements and application to lightning. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 1099310998.Google Scholar
Ecker, G. Z.: 1985 Interaction of droplet pairs in weak shock wave induced unsteady flows. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Goyer, G.: 1965a Effects of lightning on hydrometeors. Nature 206, 12031209.Google Scholar
Goyer, G.: 1965b Mechanical effects of a simulated lightning discharge on the water droplets of ‘Old Faithful’ geyser. Nature 206, 13021309.Google Scholar
Kim, S. S.: 1977 An experimental study of droplet response to weak shock waves. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Reichman, J. M. & Temkin, S., 1974 A study of the deformation and breakup of accelerating water droplets. First Intl. Symp. on Drops and Bubbles, Pasadena, pp. 446464.Google Scholar
Temkin, S.: 1969 Cloud droplet collisions induced by thunder. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 776.Google Scholar
Temkin, S.: 1970 Droplet agglomeration in a shock wave flowfield, Phys. Fluids 11, 16391641.Google Scholar
Temkin, S.: 1972 On the response of a sphere to an acoustic pulse. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 339349.Google Scholar
Temkin, S. & Kim, S. S., 1980 Droplet motion induced by weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 133157.Google Scholar
Temkin, S. & Mehta, H. K., 1982 Droplet drag in an accelerating and decelerating flow. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 297313.Google Scholar
Woods, J. D.: 1964 The wake capture of water drops in air. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 91, 3543.Google Scholar