Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:54:06.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Longitudinal-dispersion calculations in laminar flows by statistical analysis of molecular motions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Raymond J. Dewey
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario Present address: Gore & Storrie Ltd. Consulting Engineers, 1670 Bayview Ave., Toronto, Ontario M4G 3C2.
Paul J. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario

Abstract

I n this paper the streamwise growth of a passive contaminant cloud in the laminar flow within a uniform conduit is investigated. A probabilistic formulation, based on the Lagrangian motion of typical marked fluid molecules, is used to gain insight into the complex dispersion problem that exists at times that are significantly smaller (and often of more practical relevance) than those required for the asymptotic case discussed by Taylor (1953) to be valid.

Previous investigations of the small-time spread of a contaminant cloud in a tube by Lighthill (1966) and Chatwin (1976, 1977) were primarily concerned with a cloud near a tube axis as may be appropriate to an injection into the flow in arteries. When the contaminant is more uniformly spread over the conduit cross-section it is shown that, even at quite small times, the conduit boundary has a very pronounced influence on the streamwise contaminant distribution. Such a situation occurs, for example, when extracting sample fluid from a flow by means of a small-diameter sampling tube.

The streamwise spread of the contaminant cloud that results from an initial sheet of contaminant, spread uniformly over the conduit cross-section, is shown to depend critically on the Lagrangian mean-velocity history of a typical fluid molecule. This mean-velocity history function generally (and necessarily) is distinguished by a ‘hump’ whose location is determined by the proximity of the molecule's release position to the nearest conduit boundary. The ‘hump’ is a more-pronounced feature for release positions near a boundary than i t is for contaminant molecules released near the conduit centre, where the ‘hump’ becomes almost indiscernible.

The specific case of flow between parallel plates is investigated using a random-walk model of the process. A significant difference is found from the results of an analysis that excludes the influence of the conduit boundaries on the streamwise contaminant distribution at times $t = O[d^4/\kappa U^2]^{\frac{1}{3}}$, where U is the mean-flow velocity, κ is the molecular diffusivity and d is the plate separation distance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aris, R. 1956 On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 235, 67.Google Scholar
Bugliarello, G. & Jackson, E. 1964 Random walk study of convective diffusion. Proc. A.S.C.E.: J. Engng Mech. Div. 90 (EM4), 49.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1943 Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 1.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. 1970 The approach to normality of the concentration distribution in solvent flowing along a straight pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 321.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. 1971 On the interpretation of some longitudinal dispersion experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 689.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. 1976 The initial dispersion of contaminant in Poiseuille flow and the smoothing of the snout. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 593.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. 1977 The initial development of longitudinal dispersion in straight tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 33.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. & Sullivan, P. J. 1981 Diffusion in flows with variable diffusivity. In Proc. A.S.M.E./A.S.C.E. Mech. Conf., Boulder, Colorado.
Chatwin, P. C. & Sullivan, P. J. 1982 The effects of aspect ratio on longitudinal diffusivity in rectangular channels. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 347358.Google Scholar
Csanady, G. T. 1973 Turbulent Diffusion in the Environment. Reidel.
Dewey, R. & Sullivan, P. J. 1977 The asymptotic stage of longitudinal turbulent dispersion within a tube. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 293.Google Scholar
Dewey, R. J. & Sullivan, P. J. 1979a Longitudinal dispersion in flows that are homogeneous in the streamwise direction. Z. angew. Math. Phys. 30, 601.Google Scholar
Dewey, R. & Sullivan, P. J. 1979b Diffusion in diverging and converging channels. Trans. C.S.M.E. 5, 135.Google Scholar
Fröberg, C. N. 1969 Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley.
Gill, W. N. & Sankarasubramanian, R. 1970 Exact analysis of unsteady convective diffusion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 316, 341.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1966 Initial development of diffusion in Poiseuille flow. J. Inst. Math. Applics 2, 97.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1972 Application of central limit theorems to turbulence problems. In Statistical Models and Turbulence (ed. M. Rosenblatt & C. Van Atta). Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 12, p. 1. Springer.
Saffman, P. G. 1960 On the effect of the molecular diffusivity in turbulent diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 273.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1981 A delay-diffusion description for contaminant dispersion. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 469.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1982 Gaussian approximation for contaminant dispersion. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 35, 345.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. J. 1971a Some data on the distance-neighbour function for relative diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 47, 601.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. J. 1971b Longitudinal dispersion within a two-dimensional turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 551.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1921 Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 20, 196.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186.Google Scholar