Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:52:29.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perturbed turbulent flow, eddy viscosity and the generation of turbulent stresses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Russ E. Davis
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego

Abstract

The perturbation of a turbulent flow by an organized wavelike disturbance is examined using a dynamical, rather than phenomenological, approach. On the basis of the assumption that an infinitesimal perturbation results in a linear change in the statistics of the turbulence, and that the turbulence is either weak or that the turbulent perturbations are quasi-Gaussian, a method for predicting the perturbation turbulent Reynolds stresses is developed. The novel aspect of the analysis is that all averaging is delayed until the dynamical equations have been solved rather than attempting to find, apriori, equations for averaged quantities. When applied to long-wave perturbations the analysis indicates that the perturbation shear stress is of primary dynamical importance, and that this stress is determined by the principal component of mean shear through a relation which depends on the spectrum of the turbulent velocity component parallel to the gradient of the undisturbed mean velocity (the component perpendicular to the wall in a turbulent boundary layer). Theoretical arguments and observations are used to estimate the form of this spectrum in a constant stress shear layer. This results in a prediction of the constitutive law relating turbulent stress and the mean flow. The law is visco-elastic in nature, and is in agreement with the known constitutive relation for stress perturbations to a constant stress boundary layer; it resembles the eddy viscosity relation used successfully by others in describing perturbations in turbulent flows. The details of the constitutive law depend on how well the turbulence obeys Taylor's hypothesis that phase velocity equals mean flow velocity, and some insight into this question is given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnefille, R. 1970 Éatude de l'ilmenagement de l'Estuaire de la Gironde; Mesures de vitesse, salinityé, et concentration en Gironde en 1969. Electricité de France, Department Laboratoire National d'Hydraulipue Rep. T698 DHM.Google Scholar
Bowden, K. F. 1963 Int. J. Air Wat. Poll. 7, 343356.
Bowden, K. F. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 21, 8395.
Bowden, K.F. 1967 Circulation and diffusion. In Estuaries (ed. Lauff), pp. 1536. Washington: A.A.A.S. Publication 83.
Bowden, K. F. & Gilligan, R. M. 1971 Limnology & Oceanography, 16, 490502.
Dyer, K. R. & Rplmamoorthy, K. 1969 Limnology & Oceanography, 14, 415.
Elder, J. W. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 5, 544560.
Ellison, T. H. & Turner, J. S. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 8, 514544.
Fischer, H. B. 1967 J. Hyd. Div. A.S.C.E. 93 (HY6), 187216.
Fischer, H. B. 1968a U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 582-A.
Fischer, H. B. 1968b Proc. A.S.C.E. J. San. Eng. Div. 94, 927944.
Fischer, H. B. 1969 Cross-sectional time scales and dispersion in estuaries. Proc. 13th Congress of the Int. Assoc. for HydrauKc Research, Kyoto, Japan, 3, 173180.Google Scholar
Hansen, D. V. 1965 Currents and mixing in the Columbia River Estuary. Ocean Sci. & Ocean Eng., Trans. Joint Conf. Marine Tech. Soc. Am. Soc. Limnology & Oceanography, pp. 943955. Washington, D.C.
Hansen, D. V. & Rattray, M. 1965 J. Mar. Res. 23, 104122.
Hansen, D. V. & Rattray, M. 1966 Limnology & Oceanography, 11, 319325.
Harleman, D. R. F. 1966 Estuarine and Coastline Hydrodynamics (ed. Ippen), ch.14. McGraw -Hill.
Harleman, D. R. F. & Ippen, A. T. 1967 Two-dimensional aspects of salinity intrusion in estuaries : analysis of salinity and velocity distributions. Comm. Tidal Hydraulics, Corps Engrs., U.S. Army, Tech. Bull. no. 13, 38.Google Scholar
Holley, E. R., Harleman, D. R. F. & Fischer, H. B. 1970. J. Hyd. Div., Proc. A.S.C.E. 96 (HY8), 16911709.
Inglis, C. C. & Allen, F. H. 1957 Proc. I.C.E. 7, 827868.
Ippen, A. T. 1966 Estuary and Coastline Hydrodynamics, p. 744. McGraw-Hill.
Ippen, A. T. & Harleman, D. R. F. 1961 One-dimensional analysis of salinity intrusion in estuaries. Corps Engrs., U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg, Miss. Tech. Bull. no. 5.Google Scholar
Price, W. A. & Kendrick, M. P. 1963 Proc. Inst. of Civil Engrs. 24, 473518.
Pritchard, D. W. 1954 J. Mar. Res. 13, 133144.
Pritchard, D. W. 1958 J. Mar. Res. 17, 412423.
Pritchard, D. W. 1967 Observations of circulation in coastal plain estuaries. In Estuaries (ed. Lauff), pp. 3744. Washington: A.A.A.S. Publication 83.
Prych, E. A. 1970 Effects of density differences on lateral mixing in open channel flows: Keck Lab. of Hydraulics & Water Resources, Calif. Inst. of Tech. Rep. KH-R-21.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 7, 194208.
Taylor, G. I. 1954 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 223, 446468.
Ward, P. R. B. & Fischer, H. B. 1971 Water Resources Res. 7, 215220.
Yotsuktjra, N., Fischer, H. B. & Sayre, W. W. 1970 Measurement of Mixing Charac-teristics of the Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and Plattsmouth, Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper, 1899-G, 29.Google Scholar