Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T00:15:22.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of surface-active contamination on the initiation of wind waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

John C. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston

Abstract

A small-scale apparatus was used to examine the effects of surface materials on the initiation of waves on water by the action of wind. Rigorous procedures were followed to ensure freedom from contamination of the initial water surface, and the effect of various forms of subsequent contamination were investigated, using a sensitive moire fringe wave slope observation technique. Provision was made in the design of the water container for insoluble films to circulate, avoiding the downwind buildup of contamination.

In measurements on pure water surfaces, no evidence of a ‘critical wind velocity’ was found, although slightly contaminated water was found to be appreciably less responsive to the wind excitation at wind speeds up to 4 m s−l. Measurements on monolayer-covered surfaces showed that, at these wind speeds, a compressed monolayer of relatively high surface tension and low dilational elasticity can have a greater stilling effect than one of low surface tension and high dilational elasticity. Measurements on a series of solutions of surface-active material, covering a range of surface tensions from 63 to 26 mN m−l at a concentration expected to reduce dilational elasticity by bulk-to-surface diffusion, indicated that the damping effect becomes steadily greater as the surface tension decreases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1972 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, J. 1883 Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 12, 5675.
Blanchard, D. C. 1963 Progress in Oceanography, 1, 71202.
COX, C. S. 1958 J. Mar. Res. 16, 199230.
Davies, J. T., Qidwai, A. & Hameed, A. 1968 Chem. Engng Sci. 23, 331337.
Davies, J. T. & Rideal, E. K. 1963 Interfacial Phenomena, 2nd edn. Academic.
Davies, J. T. & Vose, T. W. 1965 Proc. Roy. SOC. A 286, 218234.
Gaines, G. L. 1966 Insoluble Monolayers at Liquid-Gas Interfaces. Interscience.
Gupta, A. K., Landahl, M. T. & Mollo-Christensen, E. L. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 33, 673691.
Hino, M., Kataoka, S. & Kaneko, D. 1969 Coastal Engng in Japan, 12, 18.
Kitchener, J. A. 1964 In Recent Progress in Surface Science vol. 1, pp. 5193. Academic.
Lucassen, J. & Hansen, R. S. 1966 J. Coll. Int. Sci. 22, 3244.
Lucassen-Reynders, E. H. & Lucassen, J. 1969 J. Adw. Coll. Int. Sci. 2, 347395.
Marangoni, C. 1872 Nuovo Cimento, Ser. 2, 516, 239273.
Padday, J. F. 1957 In Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Surface Activity, vol. 1, pp. 16.
Butterworths, Scott, J. C. 1969 Optics Techn. 1, 240243.
Scott, J. C. & Stephens, R. W. B. 1972 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 871878.
Shuler, R. J. & Zisman, W. A. 1970 J. Phys. Chem. 74, 15231534.
Wu, J. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 34, 91112.