Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T12:30:05.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The shape of submarine levees: exponential or power law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2009

V. K. BIRMAN ,
E. MEIBURG  and
B. KNELLER
V. K. BIRMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
E. MEIBURG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
B. KNELLER
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: meiburg@engineering.ucsb.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field observations indicate that the height of submarine levees decays with distance from the channel either exponentially or according to a power law. This investigation clarifies the flow conditions that lead to these respective shapes, via a shallow water model for the overflow currents that govern the levee formation. The model is based on a steady state balance of sediment supply by the turbidity current, and sediment deposition onto the levee, with the settling velocity and the entrainment rate appearing as parameters. It demonstrates that entrainment of ambient fluid is the determining factor for the levee shape. For negligible entrainment rates, levee shapes tend to exhibit exponential profiles, while constant rates of entrainment or detrainment result in power law shapes. Interestingly, whether a levee has an exponential or a power law shape is determined by kinematic considerations only, viz. the balance laws for sediment mass and fluid volume. We find that the respective coefficients governing the exponential or power law decay depend on the settling speeds of the sediment grains, which in turn is a function of the grain size. Two-dimensional, unsteady Navier–Stokes simulations confirm the emergence of a quasi-steady state. The depositional behaviour of this quasi-steady state is consistent with the predictions of the shallow water model, thus validating the assumptions underlying the model, and demonstrating its predictive abilities.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 619 , 25 January 2009 , pp. 367 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babonneau, N., Savoye, B., Cremer, M. & Klein, B. 2002 Morphology and architecture of the present canyon and channel system of the Zaire deep-sea fan. Mar Petrol Geol 19, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghin, P., Hopfinger, E. J. & Britter, R. E. 1981 Gravitational convection from instantaneous sources on inclined boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birman, V. K., Battandier, B. A., Meiburg, E. & Linden, P. F. 2007 Lock exchange flows in sloping channels. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchette, F., Strauss, M., Meiburg, E., Kneller, B. & Glinsky, M. E. 2005 High-resolution numerical simulations of resuspending gravity currents: conditions for self-sustainment. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnecaze, R., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 1993 Particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. & Lister, J. 1999 Particle-driven gravity currents down planar slopes. J. Fluid Mech. 390, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, A. J., Normark, W. R. & Piper, D. J. W. 1984 Modelling of turbidity currents on the navy submarine fan, California continental borderland. Sedimentology 31, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britter, R. & Linden, P. 1980 The motion of the front of a gravity current travelling down an incline. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. D. & Pickering, K. T. 1996 Submarine Channels, Processes and Architecture. Vallis Press, London.Google Scholar
Dade, W. B., Lister, J. R. & Huppert, H. E. 1994 Fine-sediment deposition from gravity surges on uniform slopes. J Sed Res A 64, 423–432.Google Scholar
Hallworth, M. A., Phillips, J. C., Huppert, H. E. & Sparks, S. J. 1993 Entrainment in turbulent gravity currents. Nature 362, 829–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härtel, C., Meiburg, E. & Necker, F. 2000 Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. part 1. flow topology and front speed for slip and no-slip boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscott, R. N., Hall, F. R. & Pirmez, C. 1997 Turbidity-current overspill from the Amazon channel; texture of the silt/sand load, paleoflow from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility and implications for flow processes. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program 155, 53–78.Google Scholar
Huebscher, C., Spiess, V., Breitzke, M. & Weber, M. E. 1997 The youngest channel–levee system of the Bengal fan; results from digital sediment echosounder data. Mar. Geol. 141, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 1998 Quantitative modeling of granular suspension flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 356, 2471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, I. A., Kneller, B. C., Dykstra, M., Kassem, A. & McCaffrey, W. D. 2007 Anatomy of a Submarine Channel Levee: an Example from Upper Cretaceous Slope Sediments, Rosario Formation, Baja California, Mexico. Mar. Petrol Geol. 24, 540–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolla, V. & Schwab, A. M. 1995 Atlas of Deep Water Environments; Architectural Style in Turbidite systems (Indus fan: multi-channel seismic reflection images of channel–levee-overbank complexes). Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Necker, F., Härtel, C., Kleiser, L. & Meiburg, E. 2002 High-resolution simulations of particle-driven gravity currents. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 28, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necker, F., Härtel, C., Kleiser, L. & Meiburg, E. 2005 Mixing and dissipation in particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normark, W. R. & Piper, D. J. W. 1991 Initiation processes and flow evolution of turbidity currents; implications for the depositional record. In From shoreline to abyss; contributions in marine geology in honor of Francis Parker Shepard (ed. R. H. Osborne) pp. 207–230. SEPM Spec. Publ. 46.Google Scholar
Normark, W. R., Posamentier, H. & Mutti, E. 1993 Turbidite systems; state of the art and future directions. Rev Geophys 31, 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, D. J. W. & Savoye, B. 1993 Processes of late quaternary turbidity current flow and deposition on the Var deep-sea fan, north-west Mediterranean sea. Sedimentology 40, 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirmez, C. & Imran, J. 2003 Reconstruction of turbidity currents in Amazon channel. Mar Petrol Geol 20, 823–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rooij, F. & Dalziel, S. B. 1998 Time-resolved measurements of the deposition under turbidity currents. In Proceedings of the Conference on Sediment Transport and Deposition by Particulate Gravity Currents, Leeds.Google Scholar
Skene, K. I., Piper, D. J. W. & Hill, P. S. 2002 Quantitative analysis of variations in depositional sequence thickness from submarine channel levees. Sedimentology 49, 1411–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivatsan, L., Lake, L. W. & Bonnecaze, R. T. 2004 Scaling analysis of deposition from turbidity currents. Geo-Mar. Lett. 24, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1968 The influence of molecular diffusivity on turbulent entrainment across a density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1986 Turbulent entrainment: the development of the entrainment assumption, and its application to geophysical flows. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar