Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T22:33:45.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetics of rennin action on casein prepared by ultracentrifugation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. V. Castle  and
J. V. Wheelock
A. V. Castle
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, The University, Bradford, Yorkshire BD7 1DP
J. V. Wheelock
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, The University, Bradford, Yorkshire BD7 1DP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The kinetics of the primary phase of rennin action on casein micelles and on total casein prepared by ultracentrifugation have been studied. It was observed that the values of Km and V varied for the different casein samples. Addition of whey proteins to the reaction mixture or variation of the concentrations of Na+ and K+ had no effect on Km and V and V, but there was a consistent increase in the values of both these parameters when κ-casein was added. It was concluded that these changes were due to an increase in the accessibility of the κ-casein resulting from the rearrangement of the casein micelles. These results are in agreement with our earlier conclusion that the Km for rennin action on casein is dependent on the carbohydrate composition of the molecule.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 77 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, C. E., Mackinlay, A. G., Hill, R. J. & Wake, R. G. (1967). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 140, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohren, H. U. & Wenner, V. R. (1961). Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, A. V. & Wheelock, J. V. (1971). Journal of Dairy Research 38, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, A. V. & Wheelock, J. V. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, T. C. A. (1960). Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Ireland, Cork.Google Scholar
Noble, R. W. Jr & Waugh, D. F. (1965). Journal of the American Chemical Society 87, 2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Wheelock, J. V. (1967). Journal of Dairy Research 34, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinkinson, G. & Wheelock, J. V. (1970 a). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinkinson, G. & Wheelock, J. V. (1970 b). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 215, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, H. (1954). Practical Clinical Biochemistry, 1st Edn, p. 137. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wake, R. G. (1959). Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 12, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. & von Hippel, P. H. (1956). Journal of the American Chemical Society 78, 4576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V. & Penney, J. P. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaguchi, M., Davies, D. T. & Kim, Y. K. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittle, C. A. & Custer, J. H. (1963). Journal of Dairy Science 46, 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar