Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T17:54:18.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

132. The Nutritive Value of Proteins for Milk Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Samuel Morris ,
Norman C. Wright  and
Alexander B. Fowler
Samuel Morris
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Norman C. Wright
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Alexander B. Fowler
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. As regards their nutritive value for milk production, the proteins of spring grass are markedly superior to those of autumn grass. This is shown not only from a study of milk yield, but from the increased excretion of N and S in the urine, the increased creatine excretion, and the lower biological value given by autumn grass.

2. A study of the N and S metabolism of cows receiving fresh and artificially dried grass fails to reveal any significant differences in the nutritive value as a result of artificial drying. There are no significant differences between the biological values of the proteins of fresh and of artificially dried autumn grass. A comparison of the mean biological values of the proteins of fresh and of artificially dried spring grass indicates that the latter has an inferior value for milk production, but the differences largely disappear when the biological values are calculated to a common standard.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1936 , pp. 97 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Morris, & Wright, (1933). J. dairy Res. 4, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Morris, & Wright, (1933). J. dairy Res. 5, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Palmer, (1922). Carotinoids and Related Pigments. New York: Chem. Cat. Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Drummond, , Coward, , Golding, , Mackintosh, & Zilva, (1923). J. agric. Sci. 13, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Watson, , Drummond, , Heilbron, & Morton, (1933). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 1, 68.Google Scholar
(6) Peterson, , Bohstedt, , Bird, & Beeson, (1935). J. dairy Sci. 18, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Newlander, , Jones, & Ellenberger, (1933). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. No. 362.Google Scholar
(8) Camburn, (1933). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. No. 359. (1933). No. 368.Google Scholar
(9) Woodman, & Oosthuizen, (1934). J. agric. Sci. 24, 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Patterson, (1935). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 3, 144.Google Scholar
(11) Crampton, (1935). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 3. 331.Google Scholar
(12) Morris, & Wright, (1935). J. dairy Res. 6, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Hutchinson, & Morris, (1936). (In the Press.)Google Scholar
(14) Wilson, (1933). J. Physiol. 77, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Greaves, & Morgan, (1934). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 31, 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) Block, , Jones, & Gersdorff, (1934). J. bid. Chem. 105, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Morgan, (1931). J. bid. Chem. 90, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18) Morgan, & Kern, (1934). J. Nutrit. 7, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19) Chick, , Fixsen, , Hutchinson, & Jackson, (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Maynard, , Fronda, & Chen, (1923). J. biol. Chem. 55, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21) Downey, (1924). J. Metab. Res. 5, 145.Google Scholar
(22) Mitchell, (1924). J. biol. Chem. 58, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23) Hoagland, & Snider, (1927). J. agric. Res. 34, 297.Google Scholar