Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:29:59.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light interception and utilization in determinate and indeterminate cultivars of Vicia faba under contrasting plant distributions and population densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Stützel  and
W. Aufhammer
H. Stützel
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzenbau und Grünland (340), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, Germany
W. Aufhammer
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzenbau und Grünland (340), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a 2-year field experiment at Hohenheim in 1987–88, with an intact or partly deflowered indeterminate cultivar and a determinate cultivar, light interception and dry matter production were highest in crops grown in isometric stands (equal distances between plants), lowest in double rows and intermediate in single rows. Dry matter production was greater at high than at low population density and in the wetter and cooler weather of 1987. Population density had a greater effect on DM production than on light interception. The greater leaf canopies under high density and in 1987 (Stützel & Aufhammer 1991) reduced light extinction coefficients. In the determinate cultivar, light extinction coefficients were consistently higher and light use efficiencies were consistently lower than in the indeterminate cultivar. Deflowering the indeterminate genotype and different planting designs did not change light use efficiencies and light extinction coefficients. In general, differences in light use efficiencies were inversely related to differences in light extinction coefficients.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 116 , Issue 3 , June 1991 , pp. 395 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acock, B., Reddy, V. R., Hodges, H. F., Baker, D. N.McKinion, J. M. (1985). Photosynthetic response of soybean canopies to full-season carbon dioxide enrichment. Agronomy Journal 77, 942–947.Google Scholar
Allen, L. H. (1974). Model of light penetration into a widerow crop. Agronomy Journal 66, 41–47.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B., Morgan, C. L.Ford, M. A. (1981). A field study of the carbon economy of normal and ‘topless’ field beans (Vicia faba). In Vicia faba: Physiology and Breeding (Ed. Thompson, R.), pp. 60–77. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Boyer, J. S. (1970). Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology 46, 233–235.Google Scholar
Charles-Edwards, D. A. (1982). Physiological Determinants of Crop Growth. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Charles-Edwards, D. A.Lawn, R. J. (1984). Light interception by grain legume row crops. Plant Cell and Environment 7, 247–251.Google Scholar
Charles-Edwards, D. A., Doley, D.Rimmington, G. M. (1986). Modelling Plant Growth and Development. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, C. L. (1985). Radiant energy conversion in three cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 35, 21–29.Google Scholar
Dornhoff, G. M.Shibles, R. (1976). Leaf morphology and anatomy in relation to CO2-exchange rate of soybean leaves. Crop Science 16, 377–381.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J.Pearcy, R. W. (1983). Variation in quantum yield for CO2 uptake among C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiology 73, 555–559.Google Scholar
El Nadi, A. H. (1969). Water relations of beans. I. Effects of water stress on growth and flowering. Experimental Agriculture 5, 195–207.Google Scholar
Fasheun, A.Dennett, M. D. (1982). Interception of radiation and growth efficiency in field beans (Vicia faba L.). Agricultural Meteorology 26, 221–229.Google Scholar
Ferraris, R.Charles-Edwards, D. A. (1986). A comparative analysis of the growth of sweet and forage sorghum crops. I. Dry matter production, phenology and morphology. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 3, 495–512.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N.Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation absorption, growth and yields of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.Google Scholar
Green, C. F., Hebblethwaite, P. D. & Ison, D. A. (1985). A quantitative analysis of varietal and moisture status effects on the growth of Vicia faba in relation to radiation absorption. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 143–155.Google Scholar
Green, C. F., Hebblethwaite, P. D. & Ricketts, H. E. (1986). Irrigating faba bean crops. Vorträge für Pflanzenzüchtung 11, 7–27.Google Scholar
Heath, M. C. & Hebblethwaite, P. D. (1985). Solar radiation interception by leafless, semi-leafless and leafed peas (Pisum sativum) under contrasting field conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 107, 309–318.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. L.Blackman, G. E. (1956). An analysis of the influence of plant density on the growth of Vicia faba. I. The influence of density on the pattern of development. Journal of Experimental Botany 7, 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G., Keatinge, J. D. H., Cooper, P. J. M.Dee, N. F. (1987). Solar radiation interception and utilization by chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) crops in northern Syria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 419–424.Google Scholar
Husain, M. M., Hill, G. D. & Gallagher, J. N. (1988 a). The response of field beans (Vicia faba L.) to irrigation and sowing date. 1. Yield and yield components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 221–232.Google Scholar
Husain, M. M., Hill, G. D. & Gallagher, J. N. (1988 b). The response of field beans (Vicia faba L.) to irrigation and sowing date. 2. Growth and development in relation to yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 233–254.Google Scholar
Ishag, H. M. (1973). Physiology of seed yield in field beans (Vicia faba L.). II. Dry matter production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 190–199.Google Scholar
Karamanos, A. J. (1984). Effects of water stress on some growth parameters and yields of field bean crops. In Vicia faba: Agronomy, Physiology and Breeding (Eds Hebblethwaite, P. D., Dawkins, T. C. K., Heath, M. C. & Lockwood, G.), pp. 47–59. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk.Google Scholar
Kasim, K. & Dennett, M. D. (1986). Radiation absorption and growth of Vicia faba under shade at two densities. Annals of Applied Biology 109, 639–650.Google Scholar
Kiniry, J. R., Jones, C. A., O'Toole, J. C., Blanchet, R., Cabelguenne, M. & Spanel, D. A. (1989). Radiation-use efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grain-filling for five grain-crop species. Field Crops Research 20, 51–64.Google Scholar
Legg, B. J., Day, W., Lawlor, D. W. & Parkinson, K. J. (1979). The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, J., Bardner, R., Briggs, G. G., Bromilow, R. H., Cockbain, A. J., Day, J. M., Fletcher, K. E., Legg, B. J., Salt, G. A., Simpson, H. R., Webb, R. M., Witty, J. F.Yeoman, D. P. (1981). The effects of irrigation, nitrogen fertilizer and the control of pests and pathogens on spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba L.) and residual effects on two following winter wheat crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 129–150.Google Scholar
Madeira, A. C., Clark, J. A.Rossall, S. (1988). Growth, light interception and disease in field bean (Vicia faba): the effect of late infection by Ascochyta fabae. Annals of Applied Biology 112, 585–595.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 281, 277–294.Google Scholar
Pate, J. S.Herridge, D. F. (1978). Partitioning and utilization of net photosynthate in a nodulated annual legume. Journal of Experimental Botany 29, 401–412.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A. (1980). Efficiency of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31, 29–49.Google Scholar
Pilbeam, C. J., Hebblethwaite, P. D.Clark, A. S. (1989). Effect of different inter-row spacings on faba beans of different form. Field Crops Research 21, 203–214.Google Scholar
Russell, G.Ellis, R. P. (1988). The relationship between leaf canopy development and yield of barley. Annals of Applied Biology 113, 357–374.Google Scholar
Russell, G., Jarvis, P. G.Monteith, J. L. (1989). Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth. In Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function (Eds Russell, G., Marshall, B. & Jarvis, P. G.), pp. 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sale, P. J. M. (1977). Net carbon exchange rates of fieldgrown crops in relation to irradiance and dry weight accumulation. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 4, 555–569.Google Scholar
Institute, Sas (1987). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, 6th edn.Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schubert, K. J.Ryle, G. J. A. (1979). The energy requirements for nitrogen fixation in nodulated legumes. In Advances in Legume Science (Eds Summerfield, R. J. & Bunting, A. H.), pp. 85–96. Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens.Google Scholar
Seitzer, J. F.Evans, L. E. (1973). Response of small fababeans to seed rate and spacing. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53, 279–283.Google Scholar
Stützel, H.Aufhammer, W. (1991). Canopy development of a determinate and an indeterminate cultivar of Vicia faba under contrasting plant distributions and densities. Annals of Applied Biology 118, 185–199.Google Scholar
Szeicz, G. (1974 a). Solar radiation for plant growth. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 617–636.Google Scholar
Szeicz, G. (1974 b). Solar radiation in crop canopies. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 1117–1156.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M., Mason, W. K., Bennie, A. T. P. & Rowse, H. R. (1982). Responses of soybeans to two row spacings and two soil water levels. I. An analysis of biomass accumulation, canopy development, solar radiation interception and components of seed yield. Field Crops Research 5, 1–14.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. (1983). Changes in the partitioning of assimilate of Vicia faba in response to environment. In Temperate Legumes (Eds Jones, D. G. & Davies, D. R.), pp. 175–190. Boston, London, Melbourne: Pitman.Google Scholar
Wells, R., Ashley, D. A., Boerma, H. R.Reger, B. J. (1986). Physiological comparisons of two soybean cultivars differing in canopy photosynthesis. II. Variation in specific leaf weight, nitrogen, and protein components. Photosynthesis Research 9, 295–304.Google Scholar
Whitfield, D. M. (1986). A simple model of light penetration into row crops. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 36, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woledge, J., Bunce, J. A.& Tewson, V. (1989). The effect of air humidity on photosynthesis of ryegrass and white clover at three temperatures. Annals of Botany 63, 271–279.Google Scholar