Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T03:19:10.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An evaluation of small seed for ware-potato production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge, UK
P. J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge, UK
D. Firman
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge, UK

Summary

Sixteen experiments over six seasons (1981–87) compared the growth and yield of up to 16 seed-tuber weights, ranging from 1–5 to 110–120 g, in one second-early and four maincrop varieties. Four of the experiments (1986–87) examined effects in seed tubers from seed crops planted in July; the remaining experiments used seed from crops planted at the normal time, April–May. Effects were similar for seed from the different planting dates. Plants from seed < 5 g (and occasionally up to 15 g) emerged slightly later and produced a smaller crop canopy that those from larger seed. The later emergence from the smallest seed was a consequence of a slower rate of sprout elongation. There were no effects of seed weight above 15 g on stem emergence or growth of the canopy. In 1982, a severe frost completely defoliated all plants in four experiments but within 2 weeks complete plant emergence was re-achieved from all seed weights except the smallest (1–5 g). The results suggest few differences between seed weights > 5 or 10 g in emergence from similar depths of planting or in recovery from frost damage.

Tuber yields were little affected by seed weight > 5 or 10 g, even at constant within-row spacings. Consequently, seed rates from 0·59 to 5·4 t/ha produced similar yields and the results suggest considerable economic benefits and potential for using seed tubers of much smaller weight than may be sold under current legislation. The use of small seed tubers from late-planted crops may result in further economies in production costs and reduction in disease in seed tubers.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. (1978 a). Plant density. In The Potato Crop, (Ed. Harris, P. M.), pp. 276326. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J. (1978 b). Effects of cutting seed tubers on the number of stems and tubers and tuber yields of several potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 121128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J. & O'Brien, S. A. (1987). An analysis of seed weight, seed rate and date of harvest on the yield and economic value of seed-potato crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 165182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1984). Her Majesty's Stationery Office Statutory Instrument No. 412.Google Scholar
Bean, J. N. (1981). Density studies with early potato cullivars. PhD thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Hammes, P. S. (1985). The effect of stem population on tuber yield in a trial with single-stem seed pieces. Potato Research 28, 119121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, G A. (1987). Effects of irrigation and seed tuber size on yield and infection of potatoes from commercial and healthier seed stocks. Potato Research 30, 637649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1967). Seed size and spacing for seed and ware potato crops. The Seed Potato (Journal of the National Association of Potato Merchants) 7, 1922.Google Scholar
Jarvis, R. H. (1977). An assessment of the value of different sizes of seed potatoes of maincrop varieties. Experimental Husbandry 32, 102114.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1982). Seed rate for potatoes grown as maincrop. Short Term Leaflet 653.Google Scholar
Soil Survey of England and Wales (1984). Soils of England and Wales. Bulletin no. 11. Soil Survey Unit, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. & Fox, R. A. (1979). The development of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn on the surface of the potato tuber. Potato Research 21, 291300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. N. (1988). The control of tuber size in maincrop potatoes. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. L. & Eyre, P. W. (1950).Early Potatoes. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. & Morris, G. E. L. (1979). Relationships between the number of stems produced by a potato seed tuber and its weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 403409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar