Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T05:52:30.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the efficiency of mating in the sheep II. The effect of freedom of rams, paddock size, and age of ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. R. Lindsay  and
T. J. Robinson
D. R. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Sydney, N. S. W.
T. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Sydney, N. S. W.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A factorial experiment is described in which thirty-six aged and thirty-six maiden spayed crossbred ewes were used in four successive tests at intervals of 15 days in a study of factors affecting the detection of oestrus. Variates introduced into each test were: (a) freedom of rams (free or tethered); (b) size of mating paddock (17 acres or ⅕ acre); (c) age of ewe (maiden or aged); and (d) dose of oestrogen (oestradiol benzoate, ODB: 10·0, 15·6, 24·4 μg.).

All ewes were primed with progesterone for 12 days prior to ODB injection and joining. The number of ewes detected in oestrus and the number and identity of rams which served each ewe were recorded.

In the four successive tests 29, 33, 36 and 30 ewes were served.

Significant main effects were: (a) freedom of rams—free 77, tethered, 51 (P < 0·001); (b) size of mating paddock—17 acres 49, ⅕ acre 79 (P < 0·001); (c) age of ewes—aged 57, maiden 71 (P < 0·05); and (d) dose of ODB—10·0 μg., 20; 15·6 μg., 41; 24·4 μg., 67 (P < 0·001).

Significant interactions were: (a) test number × age (P = 0·01), and (b) test number × dose of ODB (P < 0·05). The number of maiden ewes served increased and that of aged ewes decreased withsuccessive tests. There was a barely significant ohange in the slope of the ODB D/R line.

Ewes showed no obvious preference for tethered rams of any particular breed. There was a positive correlation between the performance of rams when free and tethered.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , August 1961 , pp. 141 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Biggers, J. D. (1951). J. Endocrin. 8, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1951). Nature, Lond., 167, 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkster, I. J. (1956). Proc. Ruakura Farmers' Conf. p. 20.Google Scholar
Inkster, I. J. (1957 a). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 17, 72.Google Scholar
Inkster, I. J. (1957 b). Sheepfarming Annual (N.Z.), 1957, 163.Google Scholar
Kelley, R. B. (1937). Bull. Coun. Sri. Ind. Res. (Aust.), no. 112.Google Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1956). Proc. Ruakura Farmers' Conf. p. 16.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. & Robinson, T. J. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 137.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1959). Reproduction in Domestic Animals, chap. 9, vol. 1. Ed. by Cole, H. H. & Cupps, P. T.New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. & Moore, N. W. (1956). J. Endocrin. 14, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. & Reardon, T. F. (1961). J. Endocrin. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. N. (1950). Aust. Vet. J. 26, 2, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar