Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-21T03:23:27.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voluntary intake and nutrient digestibility of low-grade roughage by ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. V. Sharma  and
N. K. Rajora
V. V. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, University of Udaipur, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
N. K. Rajora
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, University of Udaipur, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four young females of four ruminant species, namely cattle, buffalo, sheep and goat, were fed, in chopped form, a mixture of species of dry grass (Apluda aristata and Themada quadvivalvis; 3·85% crude protein) during a 28-day experimental period. Voluntary intake of grass was determined during the last 10 days and digestibility of feed nutrients during the last 6 days.

The digestibility coefficients of dry matter (D.M.) and crude fibre were higher for goats than other species, of organic matter, crude protein (CP) and ether extract were higher for goats and sheep than cows and buffaloes and of nitrogen-free extract higher for goats than cows and buffaloes and for sheep and buffaloes than cows. The daily intake of D.M., digestible CP and total digestible nutrients (TDN) is discussed in relation to body weight (BW) and kg W0·75.

Dry grass fed with mineral and vitamin supplement was adequate to sustain the body weights of buffaloes and goats but not of cows and sheep. Buffaloes utilized the dry grass better than other species as is evident from the highest feed and TDN intakes and marginal gain in weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 75 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A.O.A.C. (1965). Official Methods of Analysis. The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. A., Hentges, J. F., McCall, J. T. Jr & Ash, W. O. (1962). Comparative digestibility of nutrients in roughages by cattle and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 21, 373–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayyaluswami, P., Jagannathan, V., Venkalesar, & Jayaraman, V. S. (1966). Studies on D.M. consumption and digestibility. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 19, 146–8.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Davidson, J. L. (1966). The voluntary intake of food by sheep and cattle in relation to their energy requirements for maintenance. Animal Production 8, 75–83.Google Scholar
Cippoloni, M. A., Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L. & Parlech, H. M. (1951). Significance of the differences in the digestibility of feed by cattle and sheep. Journal of Animal Sciences 10, 337–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. (1967 a). Voluntary intake of low protein diets by ruminants. I. Intake of food by cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 375–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. (1967 b). Voluntary intake of low protein diets by ruminants. II. Intake of food by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 383–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, R. M. (1950). Protein as an indicator of pasture digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 9, 231–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. L., Hardison, W. A., Ordoveza, A. L. & Castillo, L. S. (1968). The nutritive value of Panicum maximum (Guinea grass). III. Factors affecting voluntary intake by cattle and water buffaloes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R. M. & Staples, G. E. (1951). Digestibility comparisons between steers and lambs fed prairie hays of different quality. Journal of Animal Science 10, 236–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehar, N. D. & Sahai, B. (1949). Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) top silage as feed for cattle. Current Science 18, 3–5.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1965). In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), p. 427. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1947). Feeds of the World — Their Digestibility and Composition. Agricultural Experiment Station, West Virginia University, Morgantown.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. V. & Murdia, P. C. (1974). Utilization of berseem hay by ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staples, G. E., Jordan, R. M., Gastler, G. F., Nelson, A. B. & Franzke, C. J. (1951). Effect of stage of maturity and storage on quality, quantity and nutritive value of South Dakota prairie hays. Journal of Animal Science 10, 447–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, C. J., Davidson, W. M., Kennedy, J. W., Robinson, C. H. & Muir, G. W. (1948). Digestibility studies with ruminants. XII. The comparative digestive powers of sheep and steers. Scientific Agriculture 28, 357–74.Google Scholar