Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-bzg56 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-16T09:57:11.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sowing date and harvesting date on the yield of sugar beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Hull  and
D. J. Webb
R. Hull
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
D. J. Webb
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A field experiment in each year 1963 to 1967 in Suffolk, England, tested the effect on yield of sugar beet of sowing dates ranging from 13 March to 11 May and harvest dates ranging from 20 September to 8 December. Sowings in March or early April gave similar yields of sugar but with later sowings yield decreased progressively faster. The relationship is represented by the equation

y = 106·3 (±2·24) + 0·212 (±0·184)x-0·009 (±0·003)x2,

y = yield as percentage of mean (60·1 cwt/acre of sugar), x = number of days after 12 March.

Delayed harvest increased sugar yield; the relationship is represented by the equation

y = 80·22 (±1·51) + 0·836 (±0·09)z-0·006 (±0·001)z2,

z = number of days after 19 September. This represents an increase of 0·247 cwt/acre/day of sugar in October and 0·083 cwt/acre/day in November, equivalent to about 2½ tons/acre of roots in October and 1 ton/acre in November.

The effect on sugar yield of different lengths of growing period, which ranged from 138 to 271 days, is represented by the equation

y = 38·7 (±26·6) + 1·045 (±0·267)a-0·0017 (±0·0007)a2,

a = number of days between sowing and harvest.

On average, sowing date had negligible effect on sugar percentage at harvest. In 3 years sugar percentage increased after the first harvest to a maximum and then decreased; in 2 years it decreased with consecutive harvests.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 223 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous, (1960). Sugar beet cultivation. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish Fd., Lond. no. 153.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (1962). Commissie Ter Bevorderung der Suiker- biententeelt in de Noordelijke Provinsien. Meded. Inst. rat. SuikProd. 32, 14–17.Google Scholar
Elema, D. E. (1958). Variety and date of sowing trials. Meded. Inst. rat. SuikProd. 28, 64–8.Google Scholar
Heathcote, G. D. (1970). Effect of plant spacing and time of sowing of sugar beet on aphid infestation and spread of virus yellows. Pl. Path. 19, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, F. J.Birtch, L. M., Holmberg, D. M. & Ulrich, A. (1954). Response of yield-type versus sugar-type beet varieties to soil N-levels and time of harvest. Proc. Am. Soc. Sug. Beet Technol. 8 (1), 64–70.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. & Adams, S. N. (1966). The effect of sowing date, harvest date and fertiliser rate on sugar beet. Expl Husb. 14, 65–74.Google Scholar
Roussel, N. (1957). The effect of a delayed harvest on the behaviour of some sugar beet varieties. Publs. tech. Inst. beige Amélior Better. 25, 115–39.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Bremner, P. M. (1966). The effects on growth, development and yield of sugar beet of extension of the growth period by transplantation. J. agric. Sci., Cambs. 66, 379–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1952). Physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv. Agron. 4, 101–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Baptiste, E. C. D. (1938). A comparative physiological study of sugar beet and mangold with respect to growth and sugar accummulation. I. Growth analysis in the field. Ann. Bot. N.S. 2, 437–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, D. G. & Bennett, N. H. (1962). Effect of soil moisture, nitrogen fertilisation, variety and harvest date on root yields and sucrose content of sugar beet. J. Am. Soc. Sug. Beet Technol. 12, 233–37.Google Scholar
Willey, L. A. (1964–1966). Bolting in early sown sugar beet. Br. Sug. Beet Rev. 32, 75; 33, 71; 34, 75; 35, 71.Google Scholar