Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T01:06:49.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Representative-Christology in the New Testament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2011

E. L. Allen
Affiliation:
King's College, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England

Extract

Recent discussion of the origin and status of the Christian ministry has focused attention on the shaliach in Rabbinical Judaism as a possible precursor of the apostle. The concept, we are told, was primarily a juristic one; the shaliach was delegate for another, he acted as an authorized person to whom a definite commission had been entrusted. As such a representative, he was invested with the authority of the person or group he was charged to represent, in accordance with the oft-quoted maxim: “A man's representative is as the man himself.” Thus, for example, under rabbinic law, marriage by proxy was possible. Again, a man might actually divorce his wife through such a representative, and even in a matter so personal as this, he could not subsequently undo what had been done in his name. On the other hand, the representative could not undertake independent action. It was assumed that he would keep within the commission given to him; his authority was derivative and therefore conditional upon obedience to his instructions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See further Kittel: Wörterbuch, sub υοce ὰπóστoλoς.