Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:16:51.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reaching Out and Incorporating Chinese Overseas: The Trans-territorial Scope of the PRC by the End of the 20th Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2002

Abstract

Examining the policies of the PRC towards Chinese overseas, this paper argues that since the 1990s China has been actively extending its territorial reach to encompass Chinese living outside the sovereignty of the Chinese state. Gradual changes in conceptions and methods to establish allegiances and attract increased financial investments and remittances have re-configured the Chinese state's relationships to Chinese living overseas. By analysing official documents, and through interviews with officials in Fujian (1998–2000), the author identifies two major political shifts in conceptualization. The first appeared in the late 1970s when Chinese citizens living mainly in South-East Asia were again recognized as an important source of revenue to China. A decade later, new policies were introduced appealing to ethnic Chinese and “new migrants” who had left China after 1978. It is discussed how this political adjustment fundamentally transformed the approach towards the Chinese overseas from passive anticipation of being able to gain resources to active state liaison with ethnic Chinese by calling upon their cultural and national loyalties to China.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The China Quarterly, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article has benefited from comments to earlier versions presented at the workshop “The Last Decade of Migration from the PRC to Europe and Asia” in Budapest, 26–27 May 2000 and at the “Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Studies of Chinese Overseas,” Taipei, 26–28 April 2001. Chinese colleagues have supported me with many sources. Research has been financially supported by the European Chinese Academic Network (EU) and the Economic and Social Research Council (UK).