Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:40:05.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remoulding the Critical Junctures Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2006

John Hogan
John Hogan
Affiliation:
Dublin City University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This paper improves our understanding of critical junctures, a concept employed in historical institutionalism for exploring change. However, the concept lacks rigour, weakening our ability to define critical junctures. Of late, academics have utilized other mechanisms to identify change in historical institutionalism. Thus, it is within this context that the critical junctures approach is remoulded through the specification of standards, hence reducing uncertainty as to what constitutes a critical juncture. The remoulded approach is employed here in examining change in the Irish Congress of Trade Unions' (ICTU) influence over public policy in 1987.

Résumé. Cet article permet de mieux comprendre le concept de conjoncture critique, qui est utilisé en institutionnalisme historique pour explorer le changement. Ce concept, en effet, manque de rigueur, si bien qu'il est difficile de définir les conjonctures critiques. Récemment, les théoriciens de l'institutionnalisme historique ont eu recours à d'autres mécanismes pour cerner le changement. C'est dans ce contexte que nous remanions la méthode des conjonctures critiques en établissant des normes de manière à pouvoir déterminer avec plus de certitude ce qui constitue une conjoncture critique. Nous employons cette méthode remaniée pour examiner l'évolution de l'influence de l'Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) sur les politiques publiques en 1987.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 657 - 679
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1997. “On the Concept of Turning Point.” Comparative Social Research 16: 85–105.Google Scholar
Allen, Kieran. 1997. Fianna Fáil and Irish Labour: 1926 to the Present. London: Pluto Press.
Aminzade, Roy. 1992. “Historical Sociology and Time.” Sociological Methods and Research 10: 456–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Robin. 1992. “The Unexpected Emergence of Australian Corporatism.” In Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System?, eds. Jukka Pekkarinen, Matti Pohjola and Bob Rowthorn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependency in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Baccaro, L. 2002. What is dead and what is alive in the theory of corporatism. International Labour Organization. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inst/download/dp14302.pdf (March 8, 2006).
Bacon, Peter, Joe Durkan and Jim O'Leary. 1986. The Irish Economy: Policy and Performance 1976–1986. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.
Bradley, J. and J. Fitzgerald. 1989. Medium-Term Review: 1989–1994. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.
Casper, Gretchen and Michelle M. Taylor. 1996. Negotiating Democracy: Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Clemens, Elizabeth S. and James M. Cook. 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–66.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 1998. “Comparative Method in the 1990s.” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organised Section in Comparative Politics 9 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Collier, R.B. and D. Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labour Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cortell, A.P. and S. Peterson. 1999. “Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change.” British Journal of Political Science 29: 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert Henry. 2001. “The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany.” World Politics 53 (3): 463–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Anna. 1994. “Representing Employers: The Irish Business and Employers' Confederation.” In Irish Industrial Relations in Practice, eds. T.V. Murphy and W.K. Roche. Dublin: Oak Tree Press in association with the Graduate School of Business, University College Dublin.
Djelic, Marie-Laure and Sigrid Quack. 2003. “Conclusion: Globalization and a Double Process of Institutional Change and Institution Building.” In Globalization and Institutions, eds. Marie-Laure Djelic and Sigrid Quack. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Farrell, Brian. 1993. “The Government.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 2nd ed., eds. John Coakley and Michael Gallagher. Dublin: PSAI Press.
Fearon, James D. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43: 577–92.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1996. “Causes and Counterfactuals in Social Science: Exploring an Analogy Between Cellular Automata and Historical Processes.” In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics, eds. Philip E. Tetlock and Arron Belkin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
FitzGerald, Garrett. 1991. All in a Life: An Autobiography. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Gal, John and David Bargal. 2002. “Critical Junctures, Labour Movements and the Development of Occupational Welfare in Israel.” Social Problems 49 (3): 432–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Peter Lange. 1995. “Internationalization, Institutions, and Political Change.” International Organization 49 (4): 627–55.Google Scholar
Girvin, Brian. 1994. “Trade Unions and Economic Development.” In Trade Union Century, ed. Donal Nevin. Cork: Mercier Press.
Golden, Miriam A., Michael Wallerstein and Peter Lang. 1999. “Postwar Trade-Union Organisation and Industrial Relations in Twelve Countries.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, eds. Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks and John D. Stephens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gorges, M.J. 2001. “The New Institutionalism and the Study of the European Union: The Case of the Social Dialogue.” West European Politics 24 (4): 152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Niles Eldredge. 1977. “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered.” Paleobiology 3: 115–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greener, Ian. 2005. “The Potential of Path Dependence in Political Studies.” Politics 25 (1): 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grix, Jonathan. 2004. The Foundations of Research. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hacker, Jacob S. 1998. “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and US Medical Policy.” Studies in American Political Development 12 (1): 57–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hacker, Jacob S. 2005. “Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment.” In Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, eds. Wolfgang Steeck and Kathleen Thelen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haggard, Stephan. 1988. “The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934.” International Organization 42 (1): 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardiman, Niamh. 1992. “The State and Economic Interests: Ireland in Comparative Perspective.” In The Development of Industrial Society in Ireland, eds. J.H. Goldthorpe and C.T. Whelan. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
Haydu, Jeffery. 1998. “Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and as Sequences of Problem Solving.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 339–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermansson, J. 1993. Politik som intressekamp [Policy as Interest Struggle]. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Ikenberry, John. 1994. “History's Heavy Hand: Institutions and the Politics of the State.” Unpublished manuscript.
Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1997. The Politics of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure, eds. M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 2003. “Periodization and Preferences.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, eds. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, Kieran and Denis Conniffe. 1986. Employment Policy in Ireland. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.
Kerr, P. 2002. “Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (2): 330–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, eds. Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacSharry, Raymond and Padraic White. 2001. The Making of the Celtic Tiger: The Inside Story of Ireland's Boom Economy. Cork: Mercier.
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2001. “Path Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 111–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2003. “Long-Run Development and the Legacy of Colonialism in Spanish America.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (1): 50–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mjoset, Lars. 1992. The Irish Economy in a Comparative Institutional Perspective. Dublin: NESC.
Murphy, Gary. 1999. “The Role of Interest Groups in the Policy Making Process.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 3rd ed., eds. John Coakley and Michael Gallagher. New York: Routledge.
National Economic, andSocial Council. 1986. A Strategy for Development 1986–1990: Growth, Employment and Fiscal Balance. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.
Nordby, T. 1994. Korporatisme pa norsk [Corporatism in Norway 1920–1990] 1920–1990. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
O'Donnell, Rory. 1998. Ireland's Economic Transformation: Industrial Policy, European Integration and Social Partnership. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation, andDevelopment. 1987. Ireland 1987. Paris: OECD.
Orren, Karen and Stephen Skowronek. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, B. Guy. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London: Pinter.
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45: 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependency, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” Unpublished paper, pp. 1–33.
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Redmond, V. 1985. “An Analysis of the Breakdown of National Agreements and Understandings.” MBS dissertation. University College Dublin.
Roche, William K. and Joe Larragy. 1989. “The Trend of Unionisation in the Irish Republic.” In Industrial Relations in Ireland: Contemporary Issues and Developments, ed. T. Murphy. Dublin: Department of Industrial Relations, University College Dublin.
Roche, William K. 1994a. “Pay Determination and the Politics of Industrial Relations.” In Irish Industrial Relations in Practice, eds. T.V. Murphy and W.K. Roche. Dublin: Oak Tree Press in association with the Graduate School of Business University College Dublin.
Roche, William K. 1994b. “Industrial Relations.” In Trade Union Century, ed. Donal Nevin. Cork: Mercier Press.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shoemaker, Pamela J., James William Tankard, Jr. and Dominic L. Lasorsa. 2004. How to Build Social Science Theories. London: Sage Publications.
Stark, David and Laszlo Bruszt. 1998. “Enabling Constraints. Institutional Sources of Policy Coherence and Extended Accountability.” In Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in Eastern Europe, eds. David Stark and Laszlo Bruszt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, eds. Kathleen Thelen and Wolfgang Steeck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2000. “Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change.” Studies in American Political Development 14 (1): 102–109.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, eds. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. 1975. The Formation of Nation States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Valenzuela, J. Samuel and Arturo Valenzuela. 1981. “Modernization and Dependency: Alternative Perspectives in the Study of Latin American Underdevelopment.” In From Dependency to Development, ed. Heraldo Munoz. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Vargas, Vicente. 2004. “The Political Dynamic of the Conflict in Chiapas: A History of its Critical Junctures.” Paper presented at Centre of Latin American Studies research day, University of Cambridge, 24 May 2004.