Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:54:19.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host location by Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): a wind tunnel study of chemical cues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Alvaro E. Eiras  and
Paul C. Jepson
Alvaro E. Eiras
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Southampton, UK
Paul C. Jepson*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Southampton, UK
*
P. C. Jepson, Department of Biology, University of Southampton, Medical and Biological Sciences Building, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton, SO9 3TU, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lactic acid, carbon dioxide and human sweat stimuli were presented singly and in combination to female Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) within a wind-tunnel system. The take-off, flight, landing and probing responses of the mosquitoes were recorded using direct observation and video techniques. The analyses determined the nature of the response to different stimuli and the concentration ranges within which specific behaviours occurred. A threshold carbon dioxide concentration for taking-off of approximately 0.03% above ambient was detected. Lactic acid and human sweat samples did not elicit take-off when presented alone, however, when they were combined with elevated carbon dioxide, take-off rate was enhanced in most of the combinations tested. Flight activity was positively correlated with carbon dioxide level and some evidence for synergism with lactic acid was found within a narrow window of blend concentrations. The factors eliciting landing were more subtle. There was a positive correlation between landing rate and carbon dioxide concentration. At the lowest carbon dioxide concentration tested, landing occurred only in the presence of lactic acid. Within a window of low to intermediate concentrations, landing rate was enhanced by this combination. At the highest carbon dioxide concentration, landing was however inhibited by the presence of lactic acid. The sweat extract elicited landings in the absence of elevated carbon dioxide. This indicated the presence of chemical stimuli, other than lactic acid, active in the short range. Probing occurred only at low carbon dioxide concentrations and there was no probing when lactic acid alone was tested. There was however probing in the presence of combined stimuli, the level of response seemed to be positively correlated with the ratio of carbon dioxide and lactic acid concentrations.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 151 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acree, F., Tuner, R.B., Gouck, H.K., Beroza, M. & Smith, C.N. (1968) L-lactic acid: a mosquito attractant isolated from humans. Science 161, 1346–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, T.C. (1985) Chemical control of behaviour, pp. 621–672in Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (Eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry pharmacology. Oxford, Pergamon Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Baker, T.C. & Linn, C.E. (1984) Wind tunnels in pheromone research, pp. 75–110in Hummel, H.E. & Miller, T.A. (Eds) Techniques in pheromone research. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-zeev, M. (1977) Studies on the attraction of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to man. Journal of Medical Entomology 14, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bidlingmayer, W.L. & Hem, D.G. (1980) The range of visual attraction and the effect of competitive visual attractants upon mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) flight. Bulletin of Entomological Research 70, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, H.J. & Laarman, J.J. (1975) Guinea pig, lysine, cadaverine and estradiol – attractants for the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 18, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E.E. & Sokolove, P.G. (1976) Lactic acid sensitive receptors on the antennae of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Journal of Comparative Physiology 105, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davson, H. & Segal, M.B. (1975) Introduction to physiology. 653 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frame, W.F., Struss, W.G., Maibach, H.I. (1972) Carbon dioxide emission from human arm and hand. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 59, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, J.D. (1979) Out for blood; flight orientation upwind in the absence of visual cues. Mosquito News 39, 221–229.Google Scholar
Gillies, M.T. (1980) The role of carbon dioxide in host finding by mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). A review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 70, 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M.T. & Wilkes, T.J. (1969) A comparison of range of attraction of animal baits and of carbon dioxide for some West African mosquitoes. Bulletin of Entomological Research 59, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M.T. & Wilkes, T.J. (1970) A comparison of the range of attraction of single baits for some West African mosquitoes. Bulletin of Entomological Research 60, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M.T. & Wilkes, T.J. (1972) The range of attraction of animal baits and carbon dioxide for mosquitoes. Studies in a freshwater area of West Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 61, 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepson, P.C. & Healy, T.P. (1988) The location of floral nectar sources by mosquitoes: an advanced bioassay for volatile plant odours and initial studies with Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 641–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, O.T., Lomer, R.A., Howse, P.E. (1981) Response of male Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata, to trimedlure in a wind tunnel of novel design. Physiological Entomology 6, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, F.E. (1970) Water vapour and carbon dioxide receptors in Aedes aegypti. Journal of Insect Physiology 16, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J.S. (1940) The visual responses of flying mosquitoes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 109, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A.A. & Maibach, H.I. (1966) Quantitation of effect of several stimuli on landing and probing byAedes aegypti. Journal of Economic Entomology 59, 902–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A.A. & Maibach, H.I. (1972) Effect of human breath on mosquito attraction to man. Mosquito News 32, 11–15.Google Scholar
Laarman, J.J. (1959) Host seeking behaviour of malaria mosquitoes. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Zoology 1958, 648–649.Google Scholar
Linn, C.E., Campbell, M.G., Roelofs, W.L. (1987) Pheromone components and active spaces: what do moths smell and where do they smell it. Science 237, 650–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M.S. & James, J.D. (1968) Attraction of Aedes aegypti (L.): responses to human arms, carbon dioxide and air currents in a new type of olfactometer. Bulletin of Entomological Research 58, 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, G.A.H. (1960) Observations on the mosquito Aedes aegypti in West Africa: I-The biting cycle in an outdoor population at Entebbe – Uganda. Bulletin of Entomological Research 50, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclver, S.B. & McElligott, P.E. (1989) Effects of release rates on the range of attraction of carbon dioxide to some Southwestern Ontario mosquito species. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 5, 6–9.Google Scholar
Nicholas, G. & Sillans, D. (1989) Immediate and latent effects of carbon dioxide on insects. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omer, S.M. (1979) Responses of females of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex pipiens fatigans to air currents, carbon dioxide and human hands in a flight-tunnel. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 26, 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, G.D., Smith, N. & Carlson, D.A. (1979) Attraction of female mosquitoes (Anopheles quadimaculatus Say) to stored human emanations in conjunction with adjusted levels of relative humidity, temperature and carbon dioxide. Journal of Chemical Ecology 5, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, H. & Nielsen, M.B. (1975) Animal physiology – adaptation and environment. 699 pp. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
Service, M.W. (1976) Mosquito ecology – field sampling methods. 585 pp. London, Applied Science Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956) Non-parametric statistic for the behavioural sciences. 312 pp. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, C.N., Smith, N., Gouck, H.K., Weidhaas, D.E., Gilbert, I.H., Mayer, M.S., Smittle, B.J. & Hofbauer, A. (1970) L-lactic acid as a factor in the attraction of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to human hosts. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63, 760–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, W.F. (1970) The effect of a reduction in expired carbon dioxide on the attractiveness of human subject to mosquitoes. Bulletin of Entomological Research 60, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. 2nd edn.859 pp. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Stryker, R.G. & Young, W.W. (1970) Effectiveness of carbon dioxide and L(+) lactic acid in mosquito light traps with and without light. Mosquito News 30, 388–393.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, J.F. (1987) Distance orientation of biting flies to their hosts. Insect Science and its Application 8, 611–616.Google Scholar
Takken, W. & Kline, D.L. (1989) Carbon dioxide and l-octen-3-ol as mosquito attractants. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 5, 311–315.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (1969) The circadian rhythm of flight activity in the mosquito Aedes aegypti: phase-setting effects of light-on and light-off. Journal of Experimental Biology 51, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnes, M.L. (1989) Responses of tsetse fly – Glossina pallidipes to ox odour, carbon dioxide and a visual stimulus in the laboratory. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 50, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar