Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T20:24:41.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the host relations of Halictophagus pontifex Fox (Strepsiptera), a parasite of Cercopidae (Hem., Aphrophorinae), in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. J. Greathead
D. J. Greathead
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, c/o Kawanda Research Station, P.O. Box 7065, Kampala, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relations of the Strepsipterous parasite Halictophagus pontifex Fox to seven species of its Cercopid (Aphrophorinae) hosts were studied at a grassland site in Uganda. Dissections of weekly samples of the Cercopids collected by sweeping showed that the duration of the life-cycle of H. pontifex is 30–40 days. The parasite is found only in adult hosts which can support as many individuals (up to 7) in Poophilus costalis (Wlk.) as can develop in the space available in the body cavity. Both the maximum number of parasites per host and the rate of parasitism are related to the volume of the host. Parasitism arrests development of the ovaries of female hosts; they may reproduce after emergence of male parasites but not after exhaustion of females because of reinfection by triungulins. Graphical and regression analysis of the population data (no. individuals/1 000 sweeps) show that, for P. costalis, parasitism by H. pontifex is density dependent and the chief regulating factor. Rainfall 58–64 days before sampling also was correlated with P. costalis density, but multiple regression analysis showed it to be insignificant.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , August 1970 , pp. 33 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fox, J. W. (1967). Report on some Strepsiptera in the British Museum (Natural History), including new species of Halictophagidae and Elenchidae.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 36, 41–49.Google Scholar
Greathead, D. J. (1966). The parasites of Antestiopsis spp. (Hem. Pentatomidae) in East Africa, and a discussion of the possibilities of biological control.—Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. biol. Contr. no. 7, 113–137.Google Scholar
Greathead, D. J. (1968). Further descriptions of Halictophagus pontifex Fox and H. regina Fox (Strepsiptera: Halictophagidae) from Uganda.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 37, 91–97.Google Scholar
Hassan, A. I. (1939). The biology of some British Delphacidae (Homopt.) and their parasites with special reference to the Strepsiptera.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 89, 345–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, T. W. (1937). Studies on the ecology of coffee plantations in East Africa II. The autecology of Antestia spp. (Pentatomidae) with a particular account of a strepsipterous parasite.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 86, 247–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L. (1966). A study of a natural population of Conomelus anceps Germar (Homoptera: Delphacidae) including observations on predation using the precipitin test.—J. Anim. Ecol. 35, 413–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1969). Population studies of insects attacking sugar cane. In Williams, J. R. et al. Ed. Pests of sugar cane, pp. 427–459. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. C. (1945). Recent investigations of Antestia species in Uganda.—E. Afr. agr. J. 10, 223–233; 11, 47–55.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. & Gradwell, G. R. (1968). Population models for the winter moth.—Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. no. 4, 132–142.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R. (1957). The sugar-cane Delphacidae and their natural enemies in Mauritius.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 109, 65–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar