^{page 254 note 1} Antlq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 310–12Google Scholar.

^{page 254 note 2} Ibid. 310.

^{page 254 note 3} Ibid. 311–12, pl. liii.

^{page 256 note 1} Probably that referred to in the Winchester Quarterly Record, vi, 164 of 29 January 1860, as still existing ‘within the last ten years’.

^{page 256 note 2} Antiq. Journ. xlv (1965), 231–3Google Scholar.

^{page 256 note 3} Ibid. 233.

^{page 256 note 4} Cunliffe, Barry, Winchester Excavations 1949–60, i (1964), pp. 2–5Google Scholar, fig.2.

^{page 258 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 320Google Scholar.

^{page 258 note 2} Frere, Sheppard, Britannia (1967), p. 46Google Scholar.

^{page 258 note 3} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 312Google Scholar.

^{page 258 note 4} Hawkes, C. F. C., Myres, J. N. L., and Stevens, C. G., Saint Catharine’s Hill, Winchester (1930), p. 179Google Scholar, quoting B.M. Add. MS. 6133, ff. 31, 33, 34.

^{page 258 note 5} Domesday Book, iv (Record Commission, ed. Sir H. Ellis, 1816), 535b–537a.

^{page 258 note 6} Ibid. 546a–548b.

^{page 258 note 7} Ibid. 537a.

^{page 258 note 8} Antiq. Journ. xlv (1965), 233Google Scholar.

^{page 259 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 313–19Google Scholar.

^{page 259 note 2} Ibid, xliv (1964), 197–9

^{page 259 note 3} This plate should be compared with pl. LV b, ibid, xlvi (1966).

^{page 260 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 316Google Scholar.

^{page 262 note 1} The southward extension of the 1965;/6 area has shown that the conjectural north wall of the front part of House I (ibid, xliv (1964), pl. L) does not exist. The evidence provided by House IX has also made it necessary to reconsider the whole interpretation of the front part of House I with the results shown here in pl. l.

^{page 262 note 2} For a plan of the latest phase see ibid, xlvi (1966), 315, fig. 4.

^{page 263 note 3} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 315Google Scholar, fig. 4, 317, pls. LV b, LVI b.

^{page 263 note 1} Olsen, Olaf, ‘Rumindretningen i romanske landsbykirker’, Kirkehistoriske Samlinger, 7th ser., vi, ii (1967), 235–57Google Scholar.

^{page 263 note 2} Med. Arch. x (1966), 184Google Scholar and fig. 75.

^{page 264 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 315Google Scholar, fig.4, 317–18.

^{page 264 note 2} See above, p. 263.

^{page 266 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xlv (1965), 243–9Google Scholar.

^{page 266 note 2} Ibid. xliv (1964), 202–11; xlv (1965), 249–58; xlvi (1966), 319–26.

^{page 267 note 1} Wharton, H., Anglia Sacra. i (1691), 203Google Scholar.

^{page 267 note 2} All Souls College, Oxford, MS. 114, f. 4.

^{page 267 note 3} Quirk, R. N., ‘Winchester Cathedral in the Tenth Century’, Arch. Journ. cxiv (1957), 38–41Google Scholar (henceforth cited as ‘Quirk 1957’).

^{page 267 note 4} Quirk, 1957, 66.

^{page 268 note 1} A plan will be published next year.

^{page 268 note 2} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 325Google Scholar.

^{page 268 note 3} Ibid, xlv (1965), 224–5; xlvi (1966), 325.

^{page 268 note 4} Hampshire Observer, 11 December 1886; 1 January 1887.

^{page 268 note 5} Antiq. Journ. xlv (1965), 251Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 1} Quirk, 1957, 48–56.

^{page 270 note 2} For the stages by which the church was rebuilt, 971–80, and 980–94, see Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 323–4Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 3} Clapham, A. W., English Romanesque Architecture before the Conquest (1930), p. 38Google Scholar; Webb, Geoffrey, Ely (Cathedral Books, 1950), p. 8Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 4} For details see Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 320–5Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 5} Quirk, 1957, 61–62.

^{page 270 note 6} Ibid. 48–51.

^{page 270 note 7} Op. cit. in n. 3, above.

^{page 271 note 1} Quirk, 1957, 38–41.

^{page 272 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xliv (1964), 210–11Google Scholar; ibid, xlvi (1966), 325–6.

^{page 272 note 2} Quirk, R. N., ‘Winchester New Minster and its Tenth-Century Tower’, J.B.A.A. 3rd ser., xxiv (1961), 16–54Google Scholar.

^{page 272 note 3} Ibid. 17–18, 51–52.

^{page 272 note 4} Ibid. 20–35.

^{page 272 note 5} Antiq. Journ. xliv (1964), 212–14Google Scholar; xlv (1965), 258–60; xlvi (1966), 326–8.

^{page 273 note 1} Ibid, xlv (1965), 258–60, fig. 6.

^{page 273 note 2} Bishop’s Pipe Roll, 159383, m. 44d.

^{page 274 note 1} Antiq. Journ. xliv (1964), 214Google Scholar.

^{page 274 note 2} Ibid. xlv (1965), 260.

^{page 274 note 3} Ibid. xliv (1964), 212, n. 5.

^{page 274 note 4} Proc. Hants F.C. iii (1895), 218Google Scholar.

^{page 275 note 1} Annales, … de Wintonia, , Annales Monastici (ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Series, 1865Google Scholar), ii, 51.

^{page 275 note 2} Note 1, above.

^{page 275 note 3} The hall, Period I, is built across the late Saxon ditch, which was open into the twelfth century (above, p. 273). The hall cannot therefore be earlier than de Blois’s episcopate.

^{page 276 note 1} Wood, Margaret, The English Medieval House, (1965), fig. 8Google Scholar.

^{page 276 note 2} Antiq. Journ. xlvi (1966), 328Google Scholar.

^{page 275 note 3} Repairs were still being made to the palace in 1662–84 (B.M. Stowe MS. 541, f. 139v), but it was demolished shortly afterwards to provide stone for the new palace.

^{page 277 note 1} None of the other stones so far uncovered has shown any trace of painting.

^{page 277 note 2} Quirk, R. N., ‘Winchester New Minster and its Tenth-century Tower’, J.B.A.A. 3rd series, xxiv (1961), 17–18Google Scholar.

^{page 277 note 3} Ibid., pp. 51–52, where it is suggested that these might be the buildings of the monasteriolum, erected at the end of Alfred’s life.

^{page 278 note 1} Conant, K. J., Carolingian and Romanesque Architecture, 800 to 1200 (1959), p. 24Google Scholar.

^{page 278 note 2} Hinks, Roger, Carolingian Art (Ann Arbor, 1962), pp. 99–102Google Scholar. See also Chatzidakis, M. and Grabar, A., Byzantine and Early Medieval Painting (1965), pp. 43–49Google Scholar.

^{page 278 note 3} See p. 277, ii. 3, above.

^{page 278 note 4} Dr. F. C. Anderson of the Geological Museum and Survey kindly identified the stone.

^{page 278 note 5} Mütherich, Florentine, ‘Die Buchmalerei am Hofe Karls des Grossen’ in Karl der Grosse, III, Karolingische Kunst (edd. Braunfels, W. and Schnitzler, H., 1965), p. 23Google Scholar, Abb. 7.

^{page 278 note 6} Karl der Grosse (Cat. of Aachen Exhibition, 1965), pl. 59.

^{page 278 note 7} Mütherich, op. cit., pl. i.

^{page 278 note 8} Mütherich, op. cit., pl. vi.

^{page 278 note 9} Mütherich, op. cit., pls. xiii, xiv.

^{page 278 note 10} Mütherich, op. cit., p. 17, Abb. I, and Elbern, V. H., Das Erste Jahrtausend (tafelband 1962), pl. 211Google Scholar.

^{page 279 note 1} C. F. Battiscombe (ed.), The Relics of Saint Cuthbert, pp. 396–432, pls. xxiv, xxv, xxxiii, xxxiv

^{page 279 note 2} Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, MS. 183, f. 1. Rickert, M., Painting in Britain: the Middle Ages (1954), pl. 20Google ScholarA.

^{page 279 note 3} Ker, N. R., Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon (1957), no. 335, pp. 408Google Scholar, 409.

^{page 279 note 4} M. Rickert, op. cit., pl. 2OB.

^{page 279 note 5} Paris, Bibl. Nat. lat. 114.1, f. 5v, reproduced by Boinet, A., La Miniature Carolingienne (1913), pl. cxxxiiiGoogle Scholar.

^{page 279 note 6} Wormald, F., The Benedictional of St. Ethelwold (1959), pp. 11–15Google Scholar, pl. 1.