Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T14:44:34.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Craft of Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael Shanks  and
Randall H. McGuire
Michael Shanks
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Wales, Lampeter, Dyfed SA48 7ED, Wales, United Kingdom
Randall H. McGuire
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, 13902–6000
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea of archaeology as craft challenges the separation of reasoning and execution that characterizes the field today. The Arts and Crafts Movement of the late nineteenth century established craftwork as an aesthetic of opposition. We establish craft in a Marxian critique of alienated labor, and we propose a unified practice of hand, heart, and mind for archaeology. The debates engendered by postprocessual archaeology have firmly situated archaeology in the present as a cultural and political practice. Many, however, still do not know how to work with these ideas. We argue that a resolution to this dilemma lies in thinking of archaeology as a craft. This resolution does not provide a method, or a cookbook, for the practice of archaeology, as indeed the core of our argument is that attempts at such standardization lie at the heart of the alienation of archaeology. Rather, we wish to consider archaeology as a mode of cultural productión, a unified method practiced by archaeologist, “client” public, and contemporary society.

Resumen

Resumen

La idea de la arqueología como arte desafia la separatión de razonamiento y ejecución, teoría y práctica que hoy caracteriza a la disciplina. El Movimiento de Arte y Artesanía defines del sigh XIX estableció a la artesania como una manifestatión estética de oposición. Sentamos a la artesanía dentro de una critica marxista de trabajo alienado y proponemos una práctica unifacada de mano, corazón, y mente. Los debates engendrados por la arqueología postprocesual han definido firmemente a la arqueologia del presente como una práctica cultural y politico. Sin embargo, muchos arqueólogos aúm no saben cómo implementar estas ideas. Argüimos que una solutión a este dilema consiste en pensar en la arqueología como artesanía. Esta resolutión no provee un método o un libro de recetas para la próctica de la arqueología, puesto que el niicleo de núestro argumento es que la intentión de regularizar la arqueología constituye precisamente la causa de alienatión de la disciplina. Por el contrario, deseamos considerar a la arqueologia como un modo de productión cultural, una práctica unificada del pasado, arqueólogo, público cliente, y sociedad contemporánea.

Type
Forum
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 75 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Athens, J. S. 1993 Cultural Resource Management and Academic Responsibility in Archaeology: A Further Comment. SAA Bulletin 11(2): 6–7.Google Scholar
Barker, F., and Hill, J. D. (editors) 1988 Archaeology and the Heritage Industry. Archaeological Review From Cambridge 7(2).Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1974 The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. Heineman, London.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J. 1993 Why Indiana Jones Is Smarter than the Postprocessualists. Norwegian Archaeological Review 26: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, A. 1987 The Closing of the American Mind. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. 1974 Labor and Monopoly Capital: the Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Monthly Review Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1986 Stoned Henge: Events and Issues at the Summer Solstice, 1985 World Archaeology 18(1): 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1990 Who Owns Stonehenge? Batsford, London.Google Scholar
Collcutt, S. 1993 The Archaeologist as Consultant. In Archaeological Resource Management in the UK: An Introduction, edited by Hunter, J. and Ralston, I., pp. 158–168. Alan Sutton, Dover, England.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1982 The Report of a Joint Working Party of the Council for British Archaeology and the Department of the Environment. Department of the Environment and Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1990 Publishing in the City. Antiquity 64: 667–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, R. D. 1979 Why and How to Improve Archaeology's Business Work. American Antiquity 44: 572–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCicco, G. 1988 A Public Relations Primer. American Antiquity 53: 840–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deetz, J. D. 1977 In Small Things Forgotten. Anchor Press, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment 1975 Principles of Publication in Rescue Archaeology. Report by a Working party of the Ancient Monuments Board for England. Committee for Rescue Archaeology (The Frere Report), Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment 1990 Planning Policy Guidance Note 16: Archaeology and Planning. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Dormer, P. 1988 The Ideal World of Vermeer's Little Lacemaker. In Design After Modernism, edited by Thackara, J., pp. 135–144. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Dormer, P. 1990 The Meanings of Modern Design. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Dormer, P. 1994 The Art of the Maker: Skill and its Meaning in Art, Craft and Design. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Duke, P. 1991 Cultural Resource Management and the Professional Archaeologist. SAA Bulletin 9(4): 10–11.Google Scholar
English, Heritage 1991 The Management of Archaeological Projects. 2nd ed. Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission and Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Fitting, J. E. 1978 Client Orientated Archaeology: A Comment on Kinsey's Dilemma. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 48: 12–25.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V 1982 The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archaeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist 84: 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, P. 1990 The Proper Work of the Potter. In Images of God: Consolations of Lost Illusions. Hogarth, London.Google Scholar
Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (editors) 1989 The Politics of the Past. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Gero, J. 1985 Socio-politics of Archaeology and the Women-at- Home Ideology. American Antiquity 50: 342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J. 1991 Gender Divisions of Labor in the Construction of Archaeological Knowledge in the United States. In Archaeology of Gender, edited by Willo, N. and Walde, D., pp. 96–102. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Giamatti, B. 1988 A Free and Ordered Space: The Real World of the University. W. W Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Grint, K. 1991 The Sociology of Work: An Introduction. Blackwell Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1989 Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1986 The Science Question in Feminism. Open University Press, London.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 1989 The Condition of Postmodernity. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hills, C. 1993 The Dissemination of Information. In Archaeological Resource Management in the UK: An Introduction, edited by Hunter, J. and Ralston, I., pp. 215–224. Alan Sutton, Dover, England.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1989 Writing Archaeology: Site Reports in Context. Antiquity 62: 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V, Carman, J., Last, J., and Lucas, G. 1995 Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hounshell, D. A. 1984 From the American System to Mass Production 1800-1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J., and Ralston, I. (editors) 1993 Archaeological Resource Management in the UK: An Introduction. Alan Sutton, Dover, England.Google Scholar
Institute of Contemporary Arts 1984 William Morris Today. Institute of Contemporary Arts, London.Google Scholar
Institute of Field Archaeologists 1988 By-Laws of the Institute of Field Archaeologists: Code of Conduct. Institute of Field Archaeologists, Birmingham, England.Google Scholar
Institute of Field Archaeologists 1990 By-Laws of the Institute of Field Archaeologists: Code of Approved Practice for the Regulation of Contractual Arrangements in Field Archaeology. Institute of Field Archaeologists, Birmingham, England.Google Scholar
Joukousky, M. 1980 A Complete Manual of Archaeology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Kerr, C. 1964 The Uses of the University. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981 The Manufacture of Knowledge. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. D., and Mulkay, M. (editors) 1983 Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Knudson, R. A. 1989 North America's Threatened Heritage. Archaeology 42: 71–73, 106.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1987 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Open University Press, London.Google Scholar
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. 1979 Laboratory Life. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
Layton, R. (editor) 1989a Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. Google Scholar
Unwin Hyman, London. 1989b Who Needs the Past? Indigenous Values in Archaeology. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Unwin Hyman, London. 1987 Toward a Critical Archaeology. Current Anthropology 28: 283–302.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. 1985 Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Lynton, E. A., and Elman, S. E. 1987 New Priorities for the University. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. (editor) 1985 Who Owns the Past? Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
McGimsey, C. R. III, and Davis, H. A. (editors) 1977 The Management of Archaeological Resources: The Airlie House Report. Special Publication. Society for American Archaeology, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
McGuire, R. H. 1992 Archaeology and the First Americans. American Anthropologist 94: 816–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, D. 1984 Forces of Production: a Social History of Industrial Automation. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Oilman, B. 1971 Alienation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paynter, R. 1983 Field or Factory? Concerning the Degradation of Archaeological Labor. In The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, edited by Gero, J. M., Lacy, D. M., and Blakey, M. L., pp. 17–30. Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (editor) 1992 Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, P. B. 1990 The “What” and “Why” of Public Relations for Archaeology: A Postscript to DeCicco's Public Relations Primer. American Antiquity 55: 608–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preucel, R. (editor) 1991 Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Raab, M. L., Klinger, T., Schiffer, M. B., and Goodyear, A. 1980 Clients, Contracts, and Profits: Conflicts in Public Archaeology. American Anthropologist 82: 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1991 In Defense of the Seventies. American Anthropologist 93: 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. A. 1991 The Post-Modern and Post-Industrial: A Critical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosovsky, H. 1990 The University: An Owners Manual. W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Schuldenrein, J. 1992 Cultural Resource Management and Academic Responsibility in Archaeology: A Rejoinder to Duke. SAA Bulletin 10(5): 3.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1992 Experiencing the Past: On the Character of Archaeology. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1995 Classical Archaeology: Experiences of the Discipline. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1995 Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies. In Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, edited by Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V, Carman, J., Last, J., and Lucas, G., pp. 3–29. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Society of Antiquaries of London 1992 Archaeological Publication, Archives, and Collections: Towards a National Policy. Society of Antiquaries, London.Google Scholar
Swain, H. (editor) 1991 Competitive Tendering in Archaeology. Rescue Publications/Standing Conference of Archaeological Unit Managers, Hertford.Google Scholar
Sykes, C. J. 1988 ProfScam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education. Regnery Gateway, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1995 Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1977 William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary. Merlin, London.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1990 On Modernity and Archaeological Discourse. In Archaeology After Structuralism, edited by Bapty, I. and Yates, T., pp. 127–152. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994 A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tillyard, S. K. 1988 The Impact of Modernism 1900-1920: Early- Modernism and the Arts and Crafts Movement in Edwardian England. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. 1971 The Post-Industrial Society: Tomorrow's Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Culture in the Programmed Society. Translated by Leonard Mayhew, F. X.. Random House, London.Google Scholar
Ucko, P. 1987 Academic Freedom and Apartheid: The Story of the World Archaeological Congress. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Walka, J. J. 1979 Management Methods and Opportunities in Archaeology. American Antiquity 44: 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, K. 1992 The Representation of the Past: Museums and Heritage in the Postmodern World. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office, Welsh 1991 Planning Policy Guidance Note 16: Archaeology and Planning. Welsh Office, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1991 Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Feminist Critiques and Archaeological Challenges. In Archaeology of Gender, edited by Willo, N. and Walde, D., pp. 17–23. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (editors) 1993 Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar