Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T21:31:16.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multigrid acceleration of an upwind Euler method for hovering rotor flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

C. B. Allen
C. B. Allen*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of multigrid acceleration implemented within an upwind-biased Euler method for hovering rotor flows is presented. The requirement to capture the vortical wake development over several turns means a long numerical integration time is required for hovering rotors, and the solution (wake) away from the blade is significant. Furthermore, the flow in the region near the blade root is effectively incompressible. Hence, the solution evolution and convergence is different to a fixed wing case where convergence depends primarily on propagating errors away from the surface as quickly as possible, and multigrid acceleration is shown to be less effective for hovering rotor flows. It is found that a simple V-cycle is the most effective, smoothing in the decreasing mesh density direction only, with a relaxed trilinear prolongation operator. Results are presented for multigrid computations with 2, 3, 4, and 5 mesh levels, and a CPU reduction of approximately 80% is demonstrated for five mesh levels.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1051 , September 2001 , pp. 517 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Allen, C.B. and Jones, D.P. Parallel implementation of an upwind Euler solver for inviscid hovering rotor flows, Aeronaut J, March 1999, 103, (1021), pp 129–138.Google Scholar
2. Fedorenko, R.P. The speed of convergence of one iterative process, Zh Vych Mat, 1964, 4, (3), pp 559–564 [USSR Comp Math, and Math Phys, 1964, 4, pp 227-235).Google Scholar
3. Bakhvalov, N.S. On the convergence of a relaxation method with natural constraints of the elliptic operator, Zh Vych Mat, 1966, 6 (5), pp 861–885 (USSR Comp Math and Math Phys), 6, pp 101-135).Google Scholar
4. Brandt, A. Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary-value problems. Math Comp, 1977, 31, (138), pp 333–390.Google Scholar
5. Brandt, A. Guide to multigrid development, multigrid methods, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1982, Hackbusch, and Trottenberc, , (Eds), Springer-Verlag, 960.Google Scholar
6. Jameson, A. Transonic flow calculations, 1984, Report MAE 1751, Princeton University.Google Scholar
7. Jameson, A. Time-dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings, 1991, AIAA Paper 91–1596.Google Scholar
8. Ni, R.H. A multiple-grid scheme for solving the Euler equations, AIAA J, 1982, 20, (11), pp 1565–1571.Google Scholar
9. Arnone, A., Liou, M-S. and Povinelli, L.A. Multigrid time-accurate integration of Navier-Stokes equations, 1993, AIAA Paper 93–3361.Google Scholar
10. Kroll, N. Computation of the flow fields of propellers and hovering rotors using Euler equations, 1986, Paper 28, 12th European Rotorcraft Forum, September 1986, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.Google Scholar
11. Boniface, J.C. and Sides, J. Numerical simulation of steady and unsteady Euler flows around multibladed helicopter rotors, 1993, Paper CIO, 19th European Rotorcraft Forum, September 1993, Cernobbio (Como), Italy.Google Scholar
12. Pahlke, K. and Raddatz, J. 3D Euler methods for multibladed rotors in hover and forward flight, 1993, Paper 20, 19th European Rotorcraft Forum, September 1993, Cernobbio (Como), Italy.Google Scholar
13. Raddatz, J. and Pahlke, K. 3D Euler calculations of multibladed rotors in hover: investigations of the wake capturing properties, 1994, 75th AGARD Fluid Dynamics Panel Meeting and Symposium on Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of Rotorcraft, October 1994, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
14. Raddatz, J. and Rouzard, O. Calculations of multibladed rotors in hover using 3D Euler methods of DLR and ONERA, 1995, Paper 11, 21st European Rotorcraft Forum, August 1995, St Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
15. Boniface, J.C. and Sides, J. Extension and improvement of existing Euler code of ONERA for multibladed rotors in hover, 1995. HELISHAPE Technical Report.Google Scholar
16. Sankar, L.N., Wake, B.E. and Lekoudis, S.G. Solution of the unsteady Euler equations for fixed and rotating wing configurations, 1986, AIAA J Aircr, April 1986, 23, (4), pp 283–289.Google Scholar
17. Sankar, L.N., Wake, B.E. and Lekoudis, S.G. Computation of rotor blade flows using the Euler equations, AIAA J Aircr, July 1986, 23, (7), pp 582–588.Google Scholar
18. Strawn, R.C. and Barth, T.J. A finite-volume Euler solver for computing rotary-wing aerodynamics on unstructured meshes, 1992, 48th Annual American Helicopter Society Forum, June 1992, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
19. Allen, C.B. The effect of grid topology and density on inviscid hovering rotor solutions, J Aerospace Eng, 1999, Part G7, I Mech E.Google Scholar
20. Srinivasan, G.R., Baeder, J.D., Obayasw, S. and McCroskey, W.J. Flowfield of a lifting rotor in hover, a Navier-Stokes simulation, 1992, AIAA J Aircr, October 1992, 30, (10), pp 2371–2377.Google Scholar
21. Wake, B.E. and Egolf, T.A. Implementation of a rotary-wing Navier- Stokes solver on a massively parallel computer, 1991, AIAA J Aircr, January 1991, 29, (1), pp 58–67.Google Scholar
22. Zhong, B. and Qin, N. Non-inertial multiblock Navier-Stokes calculation for hovering rotor flowfields using high order upwind scheme, 2000, Proceedings RAeS Aerodynamics Conference, April 2000, London.Google Scholar
23. Van-Leer, B. Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations, Lecture Notes in Physics, 1982, 170, pp 507–512.Google Scholar
24. Williams, A.L. and Fiddes, S.P. Solution of the 2D unsteady Euler equations on a structured moving grid. 1992. Bristol University Aero Eng Dept Report No 453.Google Scholar
25. Allen, C.B. A comparison of central-difference and upwind-biased schemes for steady and unsteady Euler aerofoil computations, Aero J. February 1995, 99, (982), pp 52–62.Google Scholar
26. Allen, C.B. The reduction of numerical entropy generated by unsteady Shockwaves, Aero J, January 1997. 101, (1001), pp 9–16.Google Scholar
27. Allen, C.B. Grid Adaptation for unsteady flow computations, J Aero space Eng, 1997, IMech E, Part G4, 211, pp 237–250.Google Scholar
28. Hounjet, M.H.L. Allen, C.B., Vigevano, L., Gasparini, L., Paoano, A. GEROS: A European Grid Generator for Rotorcraft Simulation methods, 1998, 6th International Conference on Numerical Grid Gener ation in Computational Field Simulations, July 1998, London, pp 813–822.Google Scholar
29. D’alascio, A., Dubuc, L. Peshkin, D., Vigevano, L., Allen, C.B., Pagano, A., Salvatore, F., Boniface, J-C, Hounjet, M.H.L., Kroll, N., Scholl, E., Kokkalis, A. and Righi, M. First results of the EROS European unsteady Euler code on overlapping grids, 1998, ECCOMAS 98 conference, September 1998, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
30. Renzoni, P., D’alascio, A., Kroll, N., Peshkin, D., Hounjet, M.H.L., Boniface, J-C, Vigevano, L., Morino, L., Allen, C.B., Dubuc, L., Righi, M., Scholl, E. and Kokkalis, A. EROS: A European Euler code for helicopter rotor simulations, J Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000.Google Scholar
31. Allen, C.B. CHIMERA Volume grid generation within the EROS code, J Aerospace Eng, 2000, IMech E, Part G.Google Scholar
32. Parpia, I.H. Van-Leer flux-vector splitting in moving coordinates, AIAA J, January 1988, 26, pp 113–115.Google Scholar
33. Obayashi, S. Freestream capturing for moving coordinates in three dimensions, AIAA J, 1992, 30, (4), pp 1125–1128.Google Scholar
34. Anderson, W.K., Thomas, J.L. and Van-Leer, B. Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations, AIAA J, September 1986, 24, pp 1453–1460.Google Scholar
35. Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite-volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, 1981, AIAA Paper 81-1259.Google Scholar
36. Turkel, E. and Van-Leer, B. Runge-Kutta methods for partial differ ential equations, 1983, ICASE Report.Google Scholar
37. Gordon, W.J. and Hall, C.A. Construction of curvilinear coordinate systems and applications of mesh generation, Int J of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1973, 7, pp 461–477.Google Scholar
38. Eriksson, L.E. Generation of boundary-conforming grids around wing-body configurations using transfinite interpolation, AIAA J, 1982, 20, (10), pp 1313–1320.Google Scholar
39. Thompson, J.F. A general three dimensional elliptic grid generation system on a composite block-structure, Computer Methods in App Mech and Eng, 1987, 64, pp 377–411.Google Scholar
40. Caradonna, F.X. and Tung, C. Experimental and analytical studies of a model helicopter rotor in hover, NASA TM-81232, September 1981.Google Scholar
41. Grasso, F. and Marini, M. Multigrid techniques for hypersonic viscous flows, AIAA, 1993, 31, pp 1729–1731.Google Scholar
42. Grasso, F. and Marini, M., Solutions of hypersonic viscous flows with total variation diminishing multigrid techniques, Computers and Fluids, 1995, 24, pp 571–592.Google Scholar
43. Dick, E., Multigrid formulation of polynomial flux-difference splitting for steady Euler equations, JCP, 1990, 91, pp 161–173.Google Scholar
44. Dick, E., Multigrid methods for steady Euler and Navier-Stokes equa tions based on polynomial flux-difference splitting, Multigrid Methods II, 1991, Birkhauser Verlag, pp 1–20.Google Scholar
45. Satofuka, N. and Morinishi, K. Method of lines approach to CFD using rational Runge-Kutta time-stepping scheme. Frontiers of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1995, Caughey, and Hafez, (Eds), pp 189–213.Google Scholar
46. Mavriplis, D.J. Three-dimensional multigrid for the Euler equations, AIAA J, 30, 1992, pp 1753–1761.Google Scholar
47. Allen, C.B. Multigrid acceleration of an upwind Euler scheme for fixed- and rotary-wing flows, February 2001, Dept of Aerospace Engi neering internal report AE0013.Google Scholar