Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-pmhlf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T16:25:22.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical study of transonic cavity flows using large-eddy and detached-eddy simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

P. Nayyar ,
G. N. Barakos  and
K. J. Badcock
P. Nayyar
Affiliation:
CFD Laboratory, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
G. N. Barakos
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
K. J. Badcock
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerical analysis of the flow in weapon bays modelled as open rectangular cavities of length-to-depth (L/D) ratio of 5 and width-to-depth (W/D) ratio of 1 with doors-on and doors-off is presented. Flow conditions correspond to Mach and Reynolds numbers (based on cavity length) of 0·85 and 6·783m respectively. Results from unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), large-eddy simulation (LES) and detached-eddy simulation (DES) are compared with the simulation methods demonstrating the best prediction of this complex flow. It was found that URANS was not able to predict the change of flow characteristics between the doors-on and doors-off configurations. In addition, the energy content of the cavity flow modes was much better resolved with DES and LES. Further, the DES was found to be quite capable for this problem giving accurate results (within 3dB of) experiments and appears to be a promising alternative to LES for modelling massively separated flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1117 , March 2007 , pp. 153 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rossiter, J.E., Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds, October 1967, Royal Aircraft Establishment Report No 64037.Google Scholar
2. Stallings, R.L., Store separation from cavities at supersonic flight speeds, J Spacecraft and Rockets, March-April 1983, 20, (2), pp 129–132.Google Scholar
3. Rizzetta, D.P. and Visbal, M.R., Large-eddy simulation of supersonic cavity flowfields including flow control, AIAA, August 2003, 41, (8), pp 1438–1443.Google Scholar
4. Spalart, P.R., Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations, Int J of Heat and Fluid Flow, June 2000, 21, (3), pp 252–263.Google Scholar
5. Ross, J.A. and Peto, J.W., The effect of cavity shaping front spoilers and ceiling bleed on loads acting on stores, and on the unsteady environment within weapon bays, QinetiQ report, March 1997.Google Scholar
6. Badcock, K.J., Richards, B.E. and Woodgate, M.A., Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, 36, pp 351–392.Google Scholar
7. Ross, J.A., PIV measurements of the flowfields in an aerodynamically deep cavity, May 2002, private communication.Google Scholar
8. Menter, F.R., Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA, August 1994, 32, (8), pp 1598–1605.Google Scholar
9. Ross, J.A., Cavity acoustic measurements at high speeds, March 2000, QinetiQ report DERA/MSS/MSFC2/TR000173.Google Scholar