Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:40:05.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimisation of RNAV noise and emission abatement standard instrument departures

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

S. Hartjes ,
H. G. Visser  and
S. J. Hebly
S. Hartjes
Affiliation:
s.hartjes@tudelft.nl, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands
H. G. Visser
Affiliation:
s.hartjes@tudelft.nl, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands
S. J. Hebly
Affiliation:
National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an effort to reduce the negative impact of civil aviation on the human environment, trajectory optimisation techniques have been used to minimise the single event impact of noise and gaseous emissions of departures on communities in the vicinity of airports. For this purpose, the earlier developed trajectory optimisation tool NOISHHH has been adapted to design departure trajectories optimised for environmental criteria, based on area navigation. The new version of NOISHHH combines a noise model, an emissions inventory model, a geographic information system and a dynamic trajectory optimisation algorithm to generate flight paths with minimised environmental impact. Operational constraints have been introduced to ensure that the resulting flight paths are fully compliant with the guidelines and regulations that apply to the design of standard instrument departures and the use of area navigation. To illustrate the capabilities of the new version of NOISHHH, two numerical examples are presented, which are both redesigns of standard instrument departures currently in use at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1162 , December 2010 , pp. 757 - 767
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alders, H., Advies van de heer Alders over toekomst Schiphol en de regio tot 2010, Dutch Government Report, br.8977, June 2007.Google Scholar
2. Clarke, J.P. and Nhut, T.H., ET AL Continuous Descent Approach: Design and Flight Test for Louisville International Airport, J Aircr, 2004, (41), 5, pp 1054–1066.Google Scholar
3. Van Boven, M., Development of Noise Abatement Approach Procedures, AIAA-2004-2810, 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Manchester, UK, 10-12 May 2004.Google Scholar
4. Erkelens, L.J.J., Advanced Noise Abatement Procedures for Approach and Departure, AIAA-2002-4858, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, USA, 5-8 August 2002.Google Scholar
5. Prats, X. and Puig, V., ET AL Optimal Departure Aircraft Trajectories Minimising Population Annoyance, 3rd International Conference on Research in Air Transportation ICRAT, Fairfax, VA, USA, 1-4 June, 2008.Google Scholar
6. ExternE, Externalities of Energy, ExternE Methodology 2005 Update, 2005.Google Scholar
7. Antoine, N.E. and Kroo, I.M.. Aircraft optimization for minimal environmental impact, J Aircr, 2004, (41), 4, pp 790–797.Google Scholar
8. Brooker, P.. Civil aircraft design priorities: air quality? climate change? noise?, Aeronaut J, 2006, 110, (1110), pp 517–532.Google Scholar
9. Visser, H.G. and Wijnen, R.A.A.. Optimisation of noise abatement arrival trajectories, Aeronaut J, 2003, 107, (1076), pp 607–615.Google Scholar
10. Visser, H.G.. Generic and site-specific criteria in the optimisation of noise abatement trajectories, transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2005, (10), 5, pp 405–419.Google Scholar
11. Visser, H.G. and Wijnen, R.A.A.. Optimisation of noise abatement departure trajectories, 2001, J Aircr, 2001, 38, (4), pp 620–627.Google Scholar
12. Wijnen, R.A.A. and Visser, H.G.. Optimal departure trajectories with respect to sleep disturbance, Aerospace Science and Technology, January 2003, 7, pp 81–91.Google Scholar
13. International Air Transportation Association, Jet fuel price monitor, [online database], URL: www.iata.org/whatwedo/economics/fuel_monitor/index.htm [cited June 2008].Google Scholar
14. Federal Interagency Committee On Aviation Noise, Effects of aviation noise on awakenings From sleep, June 1997.Google Scholar
15. International Civil Aviation Organization, Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Aircraft Operations, ICAO doc nr. 8168, II, Construction of Visual and Instrument Flight Procedures, 5th ed, 2006.Google Scholar
16. European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, Guidance Material for the Design of Terminal Procedures for Area Navigation (DME/DME, B-GNSS, Baro-VNAV & RNP-RNAV), 3rd ed, March 2003.Google Scholar
17. Federal Aviation Administration, Noise Abatement Departure Profiles, FAA Advisory Circular, 91-53a, July 1993.Google Scholar
18. Boeker, E.R. and Dinges, E., ET AL, Integrated Noise Model (INM) Version 6.0 Technical Manual, FAA-AEE-02-01 U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.Google Scholar
19. Baughcum, S.L. and Tritz, T.G., ET AL, Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emissions Inventories for 1992: Database Development and Analysis, Report NASA CR 4700, The Boeing Company, April 1996.Google Scholar
20. International Civil A viation Authority, ICAO Engine Exhaust Emissions Databank, Engine Exhaust Database [online database], URL: http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=702 [cited June 2008].Google Scholar
21. Aeronautical Information Services, Air Traffic Control The Netherlands, Aeronautical Information Publications [online database], www.ais-netherlands.nl/aim/091105-091217/eAIP/html/index-en-GB.html [cited June 2008].Google Scholar
22. International Civil Aviation Organization, Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Aircraft Operations, ICAO doc nr. 8168, I, Flight Procedures, 5th ed, 2006.Google Scholar