Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:50:57.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Enrollment in Twin Registries: Its Effect on Prevalence and Concordance Rates and Estimates of Genetic Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

K.S. Kendler  and
N.V. Holm
K.S. Kendler*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Human Genetics, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
N.V. Holm
Affiliation:
University Institute of Medical Genetics and the Danish Twin Register, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
*
Dept Psychiatry, MCV, PO Box 710, Richmond VA 23298, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the NAS-NRC Registry, all major diseases are more common in DZ than in MZ twins. Furthermore, concordance rates for most disorders are lower in the registry than would be expected. In this article we propose a general model which seeks to explain these phenomena. The model explores the impact of traits which increase or decrease the probability of enrollment of individuals given that the registry, like the NAS-NRC, includes only pairs where both members are enrolled. If the trait decreases the probability of selection into the registry, both the prevalence of and concordance for the trait in the registry will be lower than that found in the population. A trait which increases the probability of selection has the opposite effects. However, the magnitude of these effects are a function of the population concordance. If population concordance differs in MZ and DZ twins, the effect of differential enrollment will not be the same for the two zygosity groups. The article examines the impact of differential enrollment on estimates of heritability and common environment and explores ways in which estimates of prevalence and concordance rates can be obtained which are free of the bias introduced by selection.

Keywords

Twin registersSelectionPrevalenceConcordanceHeritability
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 34 , Issue 3-4 , October 1985 , pp. 125 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1985

References

REFERENCES

1. Allen, G, Hrubec, Z (1979): Twin concordance. A more general model. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:3–13.Google Scholar
2. Falconer, DS (1965): The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann Hum Genet 29:51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Holm, NV (1983): A note on ascertainment probability in the Allen/Hrubec twin model. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 32:37–47.Google Scholar
4. Hrubec, Z, Neel, JV (1978): The National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Twin Registry: Ten years of operation, In Nance, WE et al (eds): Twin Research, Part B: Biology and Epidemiology: New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
5. Hrubec, Z, Neel, JV (1981): Familial factors in early deaths: Twins followed 30 years to ages 51-61 in 1978. Hum Genet 59:39–46.Google Scholar
6. Hyde, RW, Chisholm, RM (1944): Studies in medical sociology III. The relation of mental disorders to race and nationality. New England J Med 231:613–619.Google Scholar
7. Kendler, KS (1983): Overview: A current perspective on twin studies of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 140:1413–1425.Google Scholar
8. Kendler, KS, Robinette, CD (1983): Schizophrenia in the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Twin Registry. A 16-year update. Am J Psychiatry 140:1551–1563.Google Scholar
9. Lykken, DT, Tellegen, A, DeRubies, R (1978): Volunteer bias in twin research: The rule of two thirds. Soc Biol 25:1–9.Google Scholar
10. Martin, NG, Wilson, RS (1982): Bias in the estimation of heritability from truncated samples of twins. Behav Genet 12:467–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Seltzer, CC, Jablon, S (1974): Effects of selection on mortality. Am J Epidemiol 100:367–372.Google Scholar
12. Smith, C (1974): Concordance in twins: Methods and interpretation. Am J Hum Genet 26:454–466.Google Scholar