Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
  • This edition has been replaced by: 9781108595162
  • This book is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
  • Cited by 34
  • Noah Lemos, College of William and Mary, Virginia
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2012
Print publication year:
2007
Online ISBN:
9780511801525
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801525
Series:
Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy
Subjects:
Epistemology and Metaphysics, Philosophy: General Interest, Philosophy
Information

Book description

Epistemology or the theory of knowledge is one of the cornerstones of analytic philosophy, and this book provides a clear and accessible introduction to the subject. It discusses some of the main theories of justification, including foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism, and virtue epistemology. Other topics include the Gettier problem, internalism and externalism, skepticism, the problem of epistemic circularity, the problem of the criterion, a priori knowledge, and naturalized epistemology. Intended primarily for students taking a first class in epistemology, this lucid and well-written text would also provide an excellent introduction for anyone interested in knowing more about this important area of philosophy.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Select bibliography
Select bibliography
Almeder, Robert, Blind Realism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992).
Almeder, Robert“On Naturalizing Epistemology,”American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 (1990), 263–79.
Alston, William, Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).
Alston, WilliamThe Reliability of Sense Perception (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).
Alston, William“Two Types of Foundationalism,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 165–85.
Alston, William“Some Remarks on Chisholm's Epistemology,”Nous, 14 (1980), 565–86.
Alston, William“How to Think About Reliability,”Philosophical Topics (1995), 1–29.
Alston, William “A ‘Doxastic Practice’ Approach to Epistemology,” Empirical Knowledge, 2nd edn., ed. Moser, Paul K. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).
Amico, Robert P., The Problem of the Criterion (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).
Audi, Robert, Belief, Justification, and Knowledge (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1988).
Audi, RobertThe Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Audi, Robert “The Sources of Knowledge,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Aristotle, , Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, 1941).
Armstrong, David, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).
Akins, Kathleen (ed.), Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
St. Augustine, On the Trinity in The Essential Augustine, ed. Bourke, Vernon J. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1974).
Ayer, A. J., The Problem of Knowledge (New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc., 1955).
Baergen, Ralph, Contemporary Epistemology (Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace and Co., 1995).
Bealer, George, “A Theory of the A Priori,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 ( 1999), 29–57.
Bender, John, W. (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory: Critical Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer and Laurence BonJour, with Replies (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).
Bergmann, Michael, Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Berkeley, George, Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, ed. Adams, Robert Merrihew (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979).
Berkeley, GeorgeA Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. Turbayne, Colin M. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957).
Blanshard, Brand, The Nature of Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1940).
BonJour, Laurence, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).
BonJour, LaurenceEpistemology (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002).
BonJour, LaurenceIn Defense of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
BonJour, Laurence“Reply to Steup,”Philosophical Studies, 55, 57–63.
BonJour, Laurence “Internalism and Externalism,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
BonJour, Laurence and Sosa, Ernest, Epistemic Justification (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003).
Butchvarov, Panayot, Skepticism about the External World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Campbell, Donald, “Evolutionary Epistemology,” The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. Schillp, Paul (LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1974).
Casullo, Albert, A Priori Justification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Casullo, Albert “A Priori Justification,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Chisholm, Roderick, Perceiving: A Philosophical Study (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1957).
Chisholm, RoderickThe Problem of the Criterion (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1973).
Chisholm, RoderickTheory of Knowledge (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966); 2nd edn., 1977; 3rd edn., 1989.
Chisholm, RoderickThe Foundations of Knowing (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).
Chisholm, Roderick “On the Nature of Empirical Evidence,” Empirical Knowledge: Readings from Contemporary Sources, eds. Chisholm, Roderick M. and Swartz, Robert J. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973).
Chisholm, Roderick“The Status of Epistemic Principles,”Nous, 24 (1990), 209–15.
Clay, Marjorie and Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge and Skepticism (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).
Cohen, Stewart, “Justification and Truth,”Philosophical Studies, 46 ( 1984), 279–95.
Cohen, Stewart“Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 57–89.
Cohen, Stewart“Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65 ( 2002), 209–329.
Conee, Earl, “The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification,”The Monist, 46 (1984), 279–95.
Conee, Earl and Feldman, Richard, Evidentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Conee, Earl, Feldman, Richard“Evidentialism,”Philosophical Studies, 48, 15–44.
Conee, Earl, Feldman, RichardThe Generality, et al., “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism,” Philosophical Studies, 89 ( 1998), 1–29.
Cornman, James, Perception, Common Sense, and Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975).
Crumley, Jack S., An Introduction to Epistemology (Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1999).
Dancy, Jonathan, Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).
Dancy, Jonathan (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).
Dancy, Jonathan and Sosa, Ernest, A Companion to Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).
Davidson, Donald, “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,” in Kant oder Hegel, ed. Dieter, Henrich (Stuttgart: Klein-Cotta, 1983).
DePaul, Michael (ed.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999).
DePaul, Michael (ed.), Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001).
DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Descartes, René, Meditations in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 2, eds. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
DeRose, Keith, “Solving the Skeptical Problem,”Philosophical Review, 104 (1995), 1–52.
DeRose, Keith and Warfield, Ted A. (eds.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Dretske, Fred, Knowledge and the Flow of Information (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981).
Dretzke, Fred“Epistemic Operators,”Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), 1007–23.
Elgin, Katherine, Considered Judgment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).
Feldman, Richard, Epistemology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003).
Feldman, Richard“An Alleged Defect in Gettier Counterexamples,”Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 52 ( 1974), 68–69.
Feldman, Richard“Reliability and Justification,”Monist, 68 (1985), 159–74.
Feldman, Richard“Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions,”Philosophical Studies, 103 ( 2001), 61–85.
Fogelin, Richard, Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
Foley, Richard, The Theory of Epistemic Rationality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).
Foley, RichardWorking Without a Net (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Foley, Richard“What's Wrong with Reliabilism,”The Monist, 68 (1985), 188–202.
French, Peter, Uehling, Theodore E. and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy5 (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press, 1980).
Fumerton, Richard, Metaepistemology and Skepticism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995).
Fumerton, Richard “Theories of Justification,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Gettier, Edmund, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”Analysis, 23 ( 1963), 121–23.
Goldman, Alan, Empirical Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).
Goldman, Alvin, Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).
Goldman, AlvinLiaisons: Philosophy, the Cognitive and the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992).
Goldman, Alvin“A Causal Theory of Knowing,”The Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1967), 355–72.
Goldman, Alvin“Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 771–91.
Goldman, Alvin “What is Justified Belief,” Justification and Knowledge, ed. Pappas, George (Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel, 1979), pp. 1–23.
Goldman, Alvin“Strong and Weak Justification,”Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 51–69.
Goldman, Alvin “The Sciences and Epistemology,” in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Greco, John, Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and their Role in Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Greco, John (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).
Greco, John “Virtues in Epistemology,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest, The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1998).
Haack, Susan, Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).
Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952).
Harman, Gilbert, Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).
Harman, GilbertChange in View (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1986).
Harman, Gilbert “Inference to the Best Explanation,” The Theory of Knowledge: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Pojman, Louis P. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1993).
Harris, James and Severens, Richard H. (eds.), Analyticity (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970).
Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Hendel, Charles W. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976).
James, William, Essays in Pragmatism (New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1948).
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1929).
Kim, Jaegwon, “What is Naturalized Epistemology?,”Philosophical Perspectives, 2 ( 1988), 381–405.
Klein, Peter, “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge,”The Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 471–82.
Klein, Peter“Knowledge, Causality, and Defeasibility,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 792–812.
Klein, Peter “Skepticism,” The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Kornblith, Hilary (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987); 2nd edn., 1994.
Klein, Peter“Beyond Foundationalism and the Coherence Theory,”The Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1980), 597–612.
Klein, Peter“Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action,”Philosophical Review, 92 (1983), 33–48.
Kvanvig, Jonathan, The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind (Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992).
Kvanvig, Jonathan (ed.), Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga's Theory Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).
Kvanvig, JonathanThe Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Leibniz, G. W., New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, trans. Alfred Gideon Langley (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1949).
Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).
Lehrer, Keith“Knowledge, Truth, and Evidence,”Analysis, 25 ( 1965), 168–75.
Lehrer, Keith“The Fourth Condition for Knowledge: A Defense,”The Review of Metaphysics, 24 (1970), 122–28.
Lehrer, Keith and Cohen, Stewart, “Justification, Truth and Coherence,”Synthese, 55 ( 1983), 191–208.
Lemos, Noah, Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Lipton, Peter, Inference to the Best Explanation (London: Routledge, 1993).
Luper-Foy, Steven (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1987).
Lycan, William, Judgment and Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Lycan, William“Moore Against the New Skeptics,”Philosophical Studies, 103 (2001), 35–53.
Maffie, James, “Recent Work in Naturalized Epistemology,”American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 ( 1990), 281–93.
Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979).
Montmarquet, James, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).
Moore, G. E., “Some Judgments of Perception,” Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960).
Moore, G. E. “Proof of an External World,” Philosophical Papers (New York: Macmillan, 1959).
Moore, G. E. “Hume's Philosophy Examined,” Some Main Problems of Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1953).
Moore, G. E. “A Defence of Common Sense,” Philosophical Papers (New York: Macmillan, 1959).
Moser, Paul, Empirical Justification (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).
Moser, PaulKnowledge and Evidence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Moser, PaulPhilosophy After Objectivity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Moser, Paul (ed.), A Priori Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).
Moser, Paul (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Moser, Paul“Epistemological Fission,”The Monist, 81 (1998), 353–70.
Moser, Paul and vander Nat, Arnold (eds.), Human Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Approaches (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995); 2nd edn., 1995; 3rd edn., 2002.
Moser, Paul, Mulder, Dwayne, H., and Trout, J. D. (eds.), The Theory of Knowledge: A Thematic Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Nozick, Robert, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).
Nozick, RobertThe Nature of Rationality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Pappas, George (ed.), Justification and Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979).
Pappas, George and Swain, Marshall (eds.), Essays on Knowledge and Justification (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).
Plantinga, Alvin, Warrant: The Current Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Plantinga, AlvinWarrant and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Plato, Meno, trans. Grube, G. M. A. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1976).
Pojman, Louis P., What Can We Know?, 2nd edn. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2001).
Pollock, John and Cruz, Joseph, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd edn. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999).
Price, H. H., Perception (New York: Robert McBride, 1933).
Pryor, James, “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist,”Nous, 34 (2000), 517–249.
Pryor, James “What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?,” Philosophical Issues, 14 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).
Quine, W. V., Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960).
Quine, W. V. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper and Row, 1953), pp. 20–46.
Quine, W. V. “Epistemology Naturalized,” Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp. 69–90.
Quine, W. V. “The Nature of Natural Knowledge,” Mind and Language, ed. Guttenplan, Samuel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).
Quinton, Anthony, “The A Priori and the Analytic,” Necessary Truth, ed. Sleigh, Robert (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972).
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).
Reid, Thomas, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1969).
Reid, ThomasInquiry and Essays, eds. Beanblossom, Ronald E. and Lehrer, Keith (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983).
Rescher, Nicolas, Scepticism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).
Roth, Michael and Galis, Leon, Knowing: Essays in the Analysis of Knowledge (New York: Random House, 1970).
Russell, Bertrand, The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912).
Russell, BertrandHuman Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (New York: Allen and Unwin, 1948).
Schmitt, Frederick, Knowledge and Belief (London: Routledge, 1990).
Shope, Robert, The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).
Shope, Robert“The Conditional Fallacy in Contemporary Philosophy,”The Journal of Philosophy, 75 (1978), 397–413.
Shope, Robert “Conditions and Analyses of Knowing,” in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul K. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Skyrms, Brian, “The Explication of ‘X knows that p’,”The Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1967), 373–89.
Sosa, Ernest, Knowledge in Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Sosa, Ernest“The Foundations of Foundationalism,”Nous, 14 (1980), 547–65.
Sosa, Ernest “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume V (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press, 1980), pp. 3–26.
Sosa, Ernest “Philosophical Scepticism and Epistemic Circularity,” Empirical Knowledge, 2nd edn., ed. Moser, Paul K. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996), pp. 303–29.
Sosa, Ernest“How to Defeat Opposition to Moore,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 141–53.
Sosa, Ernest and Kim, Jaegwon (eds.), Epistemology (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004).
Sosa, Ernest and Villanueva, Enrique (eds.), Philosophical Issues, 14 Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).
Steup, Matthias, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996).
Steup, MatthiasKnowledge, Truth, and Duty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Stich, Stephen, The Fragmentation of Reason (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990).
Stine, Gail, “Dretske on Knowing the Logical Consequences,”Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 296–99.
Strawson, P. F., Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985).
Stroud, Barry, The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).
Summerfield, Donna, “Modest A Priori Knowledge,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51 (1991), 39–66.
Tienson, John, “On Analyzing Knowledge,”Philosophical Studies, 25 ( 1974), 289–93.
Tomberlin, James (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2 Epistemology (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1988).
Tienson, John (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 13 Epistemology (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1999).
Cleve, James, “Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle,”Philosophical Review, 88 (1979), 55–91.
Cleve, James“Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Beliefs,”Monist, 68 (1985), 90–104.
Cleve, James“Supervenience and Closure,”Philosophical Studies, 58 (1990), 225–38.
Vogel, Jonathan, “Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation,”The Journal of Philosophy, 87 (1990), 658–66.
Vogel, Jonathan“Reliabilism Leveled,”The Journal of Philosophy, 97 ( 2000), 602–25.
Williams, Michael, Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Williamson, Timothy, Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Zagzebski, Linda, Virtues of the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Zagzebski, Linda “What is Knowledge?,” The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, eds. Ernest, Sosa and John, Greco (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).
Zagzebski, Linda and Fairweather, A. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.