Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 103
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2009
Print publication year:
2009
Online ISBN:
9780511575563

Book description

This book addresses the question of why a party system with a modest number of nationally oriented political parties emerges in some democracies but not others. The number of parties and nationalization are the product of coordination between voters, candidates, and party leaders within local electoral districts and coordination among candidates and elites across districts. Candidates and voters can do and do coordinate locally in response to electoral incentives, but coordination across districts, or aggregation, often fails in developing democracies. A key contribution of this book is the development and testing of a theory of aggregation incentives that focuses on the payoff to being a large party and the probability of capturing that payoff. The book relies on in-depth case studies of Thailand and the Philippines, and on large-n analysis to establish its arguments.

Reviews

‘Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies is a welcome addition to the growing literature on democratization. While most scholars are content to focus on electoral rules, Hicken argues that this only tells half of the story by giving pride of place to political parties. This book is theoretically sophisticated, analytically rigorous and empirically rich. It will certainly take its place on the bookshelves of scholars and practitioners alike.’

David Leblang - University of Virginia

‘Allen Hicken addresses a very important problem in the scholarship on party systems: the emergence or failure of coordination across districts and regions between candidates competing in elections at the district level. His work fills a major theoretical and empirical gap in our understanding of the relationship between election rules and political parties. As the author shows compellingly, this subject is an essential element in the development of national party systems, shaping the number of parties and their orientation to political issues. This book makes an important contribution, theoretically and empirically, and will receive a great deal of attention and be widely cited.’

G. Bingham Powell - University of Rochester

‘Allen Hicken has written a rigorous and important book on how effective party systems emerge in the developing world. Scholars of comparative politics as well as Asian politics will learn much from the book’s unique insights into the incentives of politicians to coordinate, and from the remarkable accumulation of data that supports its theoretical claims.’

Shanker Satyanath - New York University

'… this valuable volume also has the merit of providing unique data … and extensive analysis … Well written, benefiting from a clear style and arguments, deeply rooted in the party politics literature and institutional analyses and with efficient methodology, Hicken's book is another solid brick in the wall of comparative analyses in developing democracies.'

Source: Political Studies Review

'Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies is a well-written book and is a valuable contribution to the political party literature. Scholars and students of political parties will find this book interesting, thought-provoking and stimulating reading.'

Source: Acta Politica

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
Albritton, Robert B. and Bureekul, Thawilwadee. 2002. “Support for Democracy in Thailand.” Bangkok: King Prajadhipok's Institute.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Alesina, Alberto and Roubini, Nouriel, with Cohen, Gerald D.. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Amorim-Neto, Octavio and Cox, Gary C.. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41:149–74.
Andaya, Barbara Watson. 1999. “Political Development Between the Sixteenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: Volume 1, Part 2, From c. 1500 to c. 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Benedict. 1977. “Withdrawal Symptoms: Social and Cultural Aspects of the October 6 Coup.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 9:3.
Anderson, Benedict. 1990. “Murder and Progress in Modern Siam.” New Left Review 81: 2, 33–48.
Laothamatas, Anek. 1989. “From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism: Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
Laothamatas, Anek. 1992. Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Laothamatas, Anek. 1996. “A Tale of Two Democracies: Conflicting Perceptions of Elections and Democracy.” In The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia. Taylor, R. H., ed. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Annett, Anthony. 2000. “Societal Fractionalization, Political Stability, and the Size of Government.” IMF Working Paper. WP/00/82.
Limmanee, Anusorn. 1998. “Thailand.” In Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia. Volume 1: Southeast Asia. Sachsenroder, Wolfgang and Frings, Ulrike E., eds. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Arghiros, Daniel. 1995. Political Structures and Strategies: A Study of Electoral Politics in Contemporary Rural Thailand. Occasional Paper No. 31. Hull, England: University of Hull, Centre for South-East Asian Studies.
Backer, David and Kollman, Ken. 2003. “Electoral Laws Under Extreme Conditions: The Case of Africa.” Typescript. University of Michigan. Department of Political Science.
Banlaoi, Rommel C. and Carlos, Clarita R.. 1996. Political Parties in the Philippines: From 1900 to the Present. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Bartolini, Stefano. 2000. The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” The American Political Science Review 89 (3 Sep):634–47.
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. “New Tools and Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15:1 (165–76).
Bielasiak, Jack. 2002. “The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States.”Comparative Politics 34:189–210.
Blondel, Jean. 1968. “Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1(2) (June):180–203.
,BP (Bangkok Post). 1988. “1988 Election Special.” July 20, 1988.
,BP. 2005. “Sanoh in Open Rebellion.” June 9, 2005.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2005. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1):63–82.
Brancati, Dawn. 2003. “Design over Conflict: Managing Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism through Decentralization.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
Mesquita, Bueno, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Callahan, William A. 2000. Pollwatching, Elections and Civil Society in Southeast Asia. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Callahan, William A. 2002. “The Ideology of Vote-Buying and the Democratic Deferral of Political Reform.” Paper prepared for delivery at conference entitled, “Trading Political Rights: The Comparative Politics of Vote Buying.” Center for International Studies, MIT. August 26–27, 2002.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Caramani, Daniele. 2000. Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies. Oxford: Macmillan.
Caramani, Daniele. 2004. The Nationalization of Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M. 2007. Carey data archive. www.dartmouth.edu/∼jcarey.
Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14:14.
Carlos, Clarita R. 1997a. Dynamics of Political Parties in the Philippines. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Carlos, Clarita R.. 1997b. Handbook of Political Parties and Elections in the Philippines. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Carlos, Clarita R.. 1998a. History of Electoral Reforms in the Philippines: Pre-Spanish to 1998. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Carlos, Clarita R.. 1998b. A Chronicle of the 1998 Elections in the Philippines. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Carlos, Clarita R.. 1998c. Selected Election Cases in the Philippines: From the Supreme Court and Electoral Tribunals. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Carlos, Clarita R. and Banlaoi, Rommel C.. 1996. Elections in the Philippines: From Pre-colonial Period to the Present. Makati: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Carothers, Thomas. 2006. Confronting the Weakest Link: Aiding Political Parties in New Democracies. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Ceesay, Ousman. 2005. “NADD Come 2006.” Home of the Mandinmories. http://gambian.blogspot.com/2005/07/nadd-come-2006.html.
Veeranan, Chaiwat. 1992. “Political Roles of the Party Branches: A Case Study of the Democrat Party.” MA thesis, Department of Government, Chulalongkorn University [in Thai].
Chambers, Paul W. 2003. “Factions, Parties, Coalition Change, and Cabinet Durability in Thailand: 1979–2001.” Ph.D. dissertation, Northern Illinois University.
Traimas, Chaowana. 1997. Phakkanmuang Thai. (Thai Political Parties). Bangkok: Institute of Public Policy Studies and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
Chhibber, Pradeep. 1998. Democracy without Associations: Transformation of Party Systems and Social Cleavages in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Chhibber, Pradeep and Kollman, Ken. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.” American Political Science Review 92:329–42.
Chhibber, Pradeep and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chhibber, Pradeep K. and Nooruddin, Irfan. 2004. “Do Party Systems Count? The Number of Parties and Government Performance in the Indian States.” Comparative Political Studies 37(2) (March):152–87.
Choi, Jungug. 2001. “Philippine Democracies Old and New: Elections, Term Limits, and Party Systems.” Asian Survey 41(3):488–501.
Christensen, Scott et al. 1993. Thailand: The Institutional and Political Underpinnings of Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Clark, William Roberts and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Rehabilitating Duverger's Theory: Testing the Mechanic and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws.” Comparative Political Studies 39:679–708.
Colomer, Josep M. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
,Commission on Elections (COMELEC). 1992. Report of the Commission on Elections to the President and Congress of the Republic of the Philippines on the Conduct of the Synchronized National and Local Elections of May 11, 1992. Manila: Commission on Elections.
,Commission on Elections (COMELEC). 1995. Report of the Commission on Elections to His Excellency President Fidel V. Ramos and to Congress of the Republic of the Philippines on the Conduct of the National and Local Elections of May 8, 1992. Manila: Commission on Elections.
,Commission on Elections (COMELEC). 1998. Election results from the 1998 National and Local Elections. Data on Diskette. Manila: Commission on Elections.
,Commission on Elections (COMELEC). 2001. Election results from the 2001 National and Local Elections. http://www.comelec.gov.ph/results_main.html.
,Commission on Elections (COMELEC). 2004. Election results from the 2004 National and Local Elections. http://www.comelec.gov.ph/results_main.html
Connors, Michael. 2002. “Framing the ‘People's Constitution’.” In ReformingThai Politics. McCargo, Duncan, ed. Copenhagen: NIAS.
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. “The Dynamics of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4(4):547–68.
Corpuz, Onofre D. 1965. The Philippines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 1999. “Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination.” Annual Review of Political Science 2:145–61.
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: UC Press.
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, Mathew D., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croissant, Aurel and John, Marei, eds. 2002. Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia. Singapore: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Office for Regional Co-operation in Southeast Asia.
Cutrone, Michael and McCarty, Nolan. N.d. “Does Bicameralism Matter?” http://www.princeton.edu/∼nmccarty/bicameralism.pdf.
Darling, Frank C. 1971. “Political Parties in Thailand.” Pacific Affairs 45(2):228–41.
Isagani, Castro Jr.. 1992. “Money and Moguls: Oiling the Campaign Machinery.” In 1992 & Beyond: Forces and Issues in Philippine Elections. Kalaw-Tirol, Lornal and Colonel, Sheila S, eds. Quezon City: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism and Ateneo Center for Social Policy and Public Affairs.
Diamond, Larry. 1988. Class, Ethnicity, and Democracy in Nigeria: The Failure of the First Republic. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Diermeier, Daniel and Myerson, Roger. 1999. “Bicameralism and its Consequences for Legislative Organization.” American Economic Review 89(5):1182–96.
Dix, Robert. 1992. “Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 24:488–511.
Doner, Richard and Laothamatas, Anek. 1994. “Thailand: Economic and Political Gradualism.” In Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment. Haggard, Stephan and Webb, Steven, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
Doner, Richard F. and Ramsay, Ansil. 1997. “Competitive Clientelism and Economic Governance: The Case of Thailand.” Business and the State in Developing Countries. Maxfield, Sylvia and Schneider, Ben Ross, eds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Druckman, James N. 1996. “Party Factionalism and Cabinet Durability.” Party Politics 2: 397–407.
Druckman, James N. and Thies, Michael F.. 2002. “The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):760–71.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Boucek, Francoise. 2003. “Constructing the Number of Parties.” Party Politics 9(3):291–315.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
Epstein, Leon. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Praeger.
,Electoral Commission of Thailand. 2005. Results of the 2005 Elections [in Thai.] Electronic file.
,ERP KiM Newsletters. 2004. “Kosovo – An Ethnic, Not a Religious Conflict.” September 22, 2004.
Fearon, James D. 2003. “Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country.” Journal of Economic Growth 8(2):195–222.
Filippov, Mikhail, Ordershook, Peter, and Shvetsova, Olga. 1999. “Party Fragmentation and Presidential Elections in Post-Communist Democracies.” Constitutional Political Economy 10:3–26.
Filippov, Mikhail, Ordershook, Peter, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2004. Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, John. 2006. “Brazil: Many Parties – Few Ideas.” http://www.gringoes.com/articles.asp?ID_Noticia=861.
Franzese, Robert J., Jr. 2002. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franzese, Robert J., Jr. 2006. “Empirical Strategies for Various Manifestations of Multilevel Data.” Political Analysis 13(4):430–46.
Golder, Matt. 2005. “Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946–2000Electoral Studies 24(1):103–21.
Golder, Matt. 2006. “Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1):34–48.
Golder, Sona Nadenichek. 2006. The Logic of Pre-electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Grossholtz, Jean. 1964. Politics in the Philippines: A Country Study. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna Maria. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Haggard, Stephan. 2000. The Politics of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Handley, Paul M. 2006. The King Never Smiles: A Biography of Thailand's Bhumibol Adulyadej. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hartmann, Christof, Hassall, Graham, and Santos, Jr Soliman M.. 2001. “Philippines.” In Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook. Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia and the South Pacific. Nohlen, Dieter et al., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawes, Gary. 1992. “Marcos, His Cronies and the Philippines Failure to Develop.” In Southeast Asian Capitalists. McVey, Ruth, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program.
Hayden, Joseph. 1950. The Philippines: A Study of National Development. New York: McMillan Co.
Heller, William B. 2001. “Political Denials: The Policy Effects of Intercameral Partisan Differences in Bicameral Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17(1):34–61.
Henisz, Witold J. 2000. “The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth.” Economics and Politics 12(1):1–31.
Hewison, Kevin. 2004. “Crafting Thailand's New Social Contract,” The Pacific Review 17(4):503–22.
Hicken, Allen. 2001. “Parties, Policy and Patronage: Governance and Growth in Thailand.” In Corruption: The Boom and Bust of East Asia. Campos, J. E. L., ed. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.
Hicken, Allen. 2002. “Parties, Pork and Policy: Policymaking in Developing Democracies.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Hicken, Allen. 2005. “Constitutional Reform and Budgetary Politics in Thailand.” Presented at the annual Midwest Political Science meeting and 2005 Thai Studies Conference. April 2005.
Hicken, Allen. 2006. “Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Rise of Thai Rak Thai.” Journal of East Asian Studies 2(2):23–46.
Hicken, Allen. 2007a. “How Do Rules and Institutions Encourage Vote Buying?” In Elections for Sale: The Causes, Consequences, and Reform of Vote Buying. Schaffer, Frederic C., ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Hicken, Allen. 2007b. “How Effective Are Institutional Reforms?” In Democracy for Sale: The Causes, Consequences, and Reform of Vote BuyingSchaffer, Frederic C., ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Hicken, Allen. 2007c. “The 2007 Thai Constitution: A Return to Politics Past.” Crossroads 19(1):128–60.
Hicken, Allen. 2008. “Developing Democracies in Southeast Asia: Theorizing the Role of Parties and Elections.” In Southeast Asia and Political Science: Theory, Region, and Method. Kuhonta, Erik, Slater, Daniel, and Tuong, Vu, eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hicken, Allen and Kasuya, Yuko. 2003. “A Guide to the Constitutional Structures and Electoral Systems of Asia.” Electoral Studies 22(1):121–51.
Hicken, Allen, Satyanath, Shanker, and Sergenti, Ernest. 2005. “Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Effects of Accountability and the Dispersal of Power.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4) (October):497–507.
Hicken, Allen and Simmons, Joel. 2008. “The Personal Vote and the Efficacy of Education Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52(1) (January):109–24.
Hicken, Allen and Stoll, Heather. 2006. “Presidential Power and Presidential Candidates: How Political Institutions Shape Electoral Coordination in Presidential Elections.” Presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2006, Philadelphia, PA.
Hollnsteiner, Mary R. 1963. The Dynamics of Power in a Philippine Municipality. Quezon City: Community Development Research Council, University of the Philippines.
Horowitz, Donald. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Horowitz, Donald. 1991. A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western DemocraciesAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hunsaker, Bryan D. 1997. “Local Capabilities in a Centralized State: The Politics of Thai Municipal Grantsmanship.” Ph.D. dissertation, Northern Illinois University.
Hutchcroft, Paul D. 1998. Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hutchcroft, Paul and Rocamora, Joel. 2003. “Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines.” Journal of East Asian Studies 3(2) (May–August):259–92.
Ingelhart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Jackson, Matthew and Moselle, Boaz. 2002. “Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game.” Journal of Economic Theory 103:49–87.
Jones, Mark P. 1994. “Presidential Election Laws and Multipartism in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly 47(1):41–57.
Jones, Mark P.. 1997. “Racial Heterogeneity and the Effective Number of Candidates in Majority Runoff Elections: Evidence from Louisiana.” Electoral Studies 16:349–58.
Jones, Mark P.. 1999. “Electoral Laws and the Effective Number of Candidates in Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 61(1):171–84.
Jones, Mark P.. 2000. “Fused Votes.” In International Encyclopedia of Elections. Rose, Richard ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Jones, Mark P. 2004. “Electoral Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Candidate Competition in Presidential Elections.” Electoral Studies 23(1):73–106.
Jones, Mark P. and Mainwaring, Scott. 2003. “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems.” Party Politics 9(2):139–66.
Kam, Cindy and Franzese, Robert J.. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis: A Refresher and Some Practical Advice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wongtrangan, Kanok. 1993. Phakkanmuang Thai. (Thai Political Parties). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn Press.
Kasuya, Yuko. 2001a. “Presidential Connection: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, Chicago, March 23–25, 2001.
Kasuya, Yuko. 2001b. “Party System Linkage: Explaining its Variation in the Philippine Case.” Presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 29–September 1, 2001.
Katz, Richard. 1986. “Intraparty Preference Voting.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. Grofman, B. and Lijphart, A., eds. New York: Agathon.
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics. New York: Knopf.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kim, Jae-on and Mahn-geum, Ohn. 1992. “A Theory of Minor Party Persistence.” Social Forces 70:575–99.
Kimura, Masataka. 1992. “Philippine Political Parties and the Party System in Transition: Leaders, Factions and Blocs.” Pilipinas 18 (Spring):43–65.
Kimura, Masataka. 1997. Elections and Politics Philippine Style: A Case in Lipa. Manila: De La Salle University Press.
King, Daniel E. 1996. “New Political Parties in Thailand: A Case Study of the Palang Dharma Party and the New Aspiration Party.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
King, Daniel E. and LoGerfo, Jim. 1996. “Thailand: Towards Democratic Stability.” Journal of Democracy 7:1, 102–17.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Radoslaw, Markowskis, and Toka, Gabor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
,KPI (King Prajadhipok's Institute). 2003. “Public Opinion Survey on the Performance of the National Assembly, Government, Public Independent Organizations, and Other Issues.” Survey Report. http://www.kpi.ac.th/RD/e_pub_open.htm.
Krain, Matthew. 1997. “State-Sponsored Mass Murder: The Onset and Severity of Genocides and Politicides.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43:331–60.
Tongdhamachart, Kramol. 1982. Towards a Political Party Theory in Thai Perspective. Singapore: Maruzen Asia.
Kuezni, Michelle and Lambright, Gina. 2000. “Party System Institutionalization and Democratic Consolidation in 32 African Countries.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, August 31–September 3, 2000.
Laakso, Marku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12:3–27.
Landé, Carl H. 1965. Leaders, Factions and Parties. New Haven, CT: Southeast Asian Studies, Yale University.
Landé, Carl H.. 1971. “Party Politics in the Philippines.” In Six Perspectives on the Philippines. Guthrie, George M., ed. Manila: Bookmark.
Landé, Carl H..1996. Post-Marcos Politics: A Geographic and Statistical Analysis of the 1992 Philippine Elections. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Laquian, Aprodicio A. 1966. The City in Nation-Building: Politics and Administration in Metropolitan Manila. Manila: School of Public Administration, University of the Philippines.
Laver, Michael J. and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Michael, Laver and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” American Journal of Political Science 84: 873–90.
,Law for the Election of Members of the House of Representatives of 1979 (with 1983 amendments) [in Thai]. 1987. In The Constitution and Related Laws. Compiled by Funglatta, Wichitra. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
LeDuc, Lawrence. 1985. “Partisan Change and Dealignment in Canada, Great Britain, and the United States.” Comparative Politics 17: 379–98.
Leys, Colin. 1959. “Models, Theories and the Theory of Political Parties.” Political Studies 7:127–46.
Liang, Dapen. 1970. Philippine Parties and Politics: A Historical Study of National Experience in Democracy. San Francisco: The Gladstone Company.
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend, Rogowski, Ronald, and Weaver, Kent. 1993. “Separation of Powers and Cleavage Management.” In Do Institutions Matter: Government in the United States and Abroad. Weaver, R. Kent and Rockman, Bert A., eds. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Dhiravegin, Likhit. 1985. Thai Politics: Selected Aspects of Development and Change. Bangkok: Tri-Sciences Publishing House.
Lipset, Seymour and Rokkan, Stein, eds. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
LoGerfo, Jim. 1996. “Attitudes toward Democracy among Bangkok and Rural Northern Thais: The Great Divide.” Asian Survey 36:9 (September):904–23.
Lovatt, Catherine. 2000. “Miorita: Regional Politics and Instability.” Central Europe Review 2(2) (17 January 2000). http://www.ce-review.org/00/2/lovatt2.html.
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Machado, K. G. 1978. “Continuity and Change in Philippine Factionalism.” In Factional Politics: Political Parties and Factionalism in Comparative Perspective. Beloni, Frank P. and Belley, Dennis C., eds. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Inc.
MacIntyre, Andrew J. 1999. “Political Institutions and the Economic Crisis in Thailand and Indonesia.” In The Politics of the Asian Financial Crisis. Pempel, T. J., ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
MacIntyre, Andrew J.. 2002. The Power of Institutions: Political Architecture and Governance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Mackie, James A. C. 1988. “Economic Growth in the ASEAN Region: The Political Underpinnings.” In Trade and Development Achieving Industrialization in East Asia. Hughes, Helen, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy. 1995. “Introduction.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy, eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. “Conclusion: Presidentialism and the Party System.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mangahas, Mahar. 1998. “How the Voters Mix Their Candidates.” Social Weather Stations: Social Climate, April 1998. http://www.sws.org.ph/index.htm
Watthanakomen, Manut. 1986. Khomunphunthan phakkanmuang patchuban lae phakkanmuang kap kanluaktang pi 2522–2529. (Basic Data on Contemporary Political Parties and on Political Parties in the Elections of 1979–1986.) Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand.
Watthanakomen, Manut et al. 1987. Kanpramernpreutikam khong prachachon kiewkap khwamniyom phakkanmuan ru bukhon lae batsia khong kanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn (27 karakatakhom 2529) nay krungthepmahanakorn. (Evaluation of Public Behavior Concerning the Preference to Elect Party or Individual and the Nullified Ballots of the General Election of Members of Parliament (27 July 1986) in Bangkok Metropolis.) Bangkok: Office of Policy and Planning, Ministry of Interior.
Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Dataset. [Computer file; version p4v2002] College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
McCargo, Duncan. 2002. “Thailand's January 2001 General Elections: Vindicating Reform?” In Reforming Thai Politics. Duncan McCargo, ed. Copenhagen: NIAS.
McCargo, Duncan. 2005. “Network Monarch and Legitimacy Crises in Thailand.” The Pacific Review 18(4):499–519.
McCargo, Duncan. 2006. “Thaksin and the Resurgence of Violence in the Thai South: Network Monarch Strikes Back?Critical Asian Studies 38(1):39–71.
McCargo, Duncan and Pathmanand, Ukrist. 2005. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: NIAS.
McVey, Ruth. 2000. “Of Greed and Violence, and Other Signs of Progress.” In Money and Power in Provincial Thailand. McVey, Ruth, ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
,Ministry of Interior. 1986. Rainganwichai kanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn po. so. 2529. (Research Report on the Elections of Members of the House of Representatives 1986.) Bangkok: Local Administration Department, Ministry of the Interior.
,Ministry of Interior. 1988. Rainganwichai kanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn po. so. 2531. (Research Report on the Elections of Members of the House of Representatives 1988.) Bangkok: Local Administration Department, Ministry of the Interior.
,Ministry of Interior. 1992a. Rainganphon kanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn 22 Minakhom 2535. (Report on the Elections of Members of the House of Representatives, 22 March 1992). Bangkok: Local Administration Department, Ministry of the Interior.
,Ministry of Interior. 1992b. Phonkanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn 13 Kanayon 2535. (Results of the Elections of Members of the House of Representatives, 13 September 1992). Bangkok: Election Division, Local Administration Department, Ministry of the Interior.
,Ministry of Interior. 1995. Khomun sathiti lae phonkanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn 2 karakatakhom 2538. (Data, Statistics, and Results of the Elections of Members of the House of Representatives, 2 July 1995.) Bangkok: Local Administration Department, Ministry of the Interior.
,Ministry of Interior. 1997. Khomun sathiti lae phonkanluaktang samachiksaphaphuthaenratsadorn 17 prutsachikayon 2539. (Data, Statistics, and Results of the Elections of Members of the House of Representatives, 17 November 1996.) Bangkok: Local Administration Department, Ministry of the Interior.
Missingham, Bruce. 1997. “Local Bureaucrats, Power and Participation: A Study of Two Village Schools in the Northeast.” In Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. Hewison, Kevin, ed. London: Routledge.
Morelli, Massimo. 2001. “Party Formation and Policy Outcomes under Different Electoral Systems.” Ohio State University. Typescript.
Morgenstern, Scott and Swindle, Steven. 2005. “Are Politics Local? An Analysis of Voting Patterns in 23 Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 38(2):143–70.
Moser, R. G. 2001. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Mozaffar, Shaheen, Scarritt, James R., and Galaich, Glen. 2003. “Electoral Institutions, Ethnopolitical Cleavages and Party Systems in Africa's Emerging Democracies.” American Political Science Review 97(3):379–90.
Eiji, Murashima. 1991. “Democracy and the Development of Political Parties in Thailand: 1932–1945.” In The Making of Modern Thai Political Parties. Eiji, Murashima et al., eds. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, Joint Research Programme Series No. 86, 55–87.
Eiji, Murashima, Mektrairat, Nakharin, and Wanthana, Somkiat, eds. 1991. The Making of Modern Thai Political Parties. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, Joint Research Programme Series No. 86.
Murray, David. 1996. “The 1995 National Elections in Thailand: A Step Backward for Democracy?Asian Survey 36(4):361–75.
Waitoolkiat, Napisa. 2005. “Information Costs and Voting in Thailand: Explaining Party- and Candidate-Centered Patterns.” Ph.D. dissertation, Northern Illinois University.
,The Nation. 2006. “No Dictation on the Charter: CNS Chief.” 20 December 2006.
Neher, Clark D., ed. 1976. Modern Thai Politics: From Village to Nation. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company.
Nelson, Michael H. 1998. CentralAuthority and Local Democratization in Thailand. Studies in Contemporary Thailand No. 6. Bangkok: White Lotus Press.
Nelson, Michael H.. 2000. “The Senate Elections of March 4, 2000 (etc., etc.).”KPI Newsletter 1(3):3–7.
Nelson, Michael H.. 2001. “Thailand.” In Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook. Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia and the South Pacific. Nohlen, Dieter et al., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, Michael H.. 2002. Thailand's House Elections of 6 January 2001: A Statistical Report. KPI Reports No. 2. Nonthaburi, Thailand: Center for the Study of Thai Politics and Democracy, King Prajadhipok Institute.
Nowak, Thomas C. and Snyder, Kay A.. 1974. “Economic Concentration and Political Change in the Philippines.” In Political Change in the Philippines: Studies of Local Politics Preceding Martial Law. Kerkvliet, Benedict J., ed. Hawaii: The University of Hawaii Press.
Ockey, James. 1991. “Business Leaders, Gangsters and the Middle Class.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Ockey, James. 2000. “The Rise of Local Power in Thailand: Provincial Crime, Elections and the Bureaucracy.” In Money and Power in Provincial Thailand. McVey, Ruth, ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Ockey, James. 2005. “Monarch, Monarchy, Succession and Stability in Thailand.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 46(2):115–27.
Ordeshook, Peter C. and Shvetsova, Olga. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 38:100–123.
Painter, Mark. 2005. “Thaksinocracy or Managerialization? Reforming the Thai Bureaucracy,” Southeast Asia Research Center Working Paper (May 6, 2005) http://www.cityu.edu.hk/searc/WP.html.
Siwaraksa, Parichart, Traimas, Chaowana, and Yayagool, Ratha. 1997. Thai Constitutions in Brief. Bangkok: Institute of Policy Studies.
,Party Interviews. 1999. Author interviews with officials from Thai political parties. Bangkok, Thailand. January-June 1999. Anonymity requested.
,Party Interviews. 2000. Author interviews with officials from Thai political parties. Bangkok, Thailand. March 2000. Anonymity requested.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris. 1995. Thailand: Economy and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris. 1997. “Power in Transition: Thailand in the 1990s.” In Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. Hewison, Kevin, ed. New York: Routledge.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris. 1998. Thailand's Boom and Bust. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris. 2000. “Chao Sua, Chao Pho, Chao Thi: Lord's of Thailand's Transition.” In Money and Power in Provincial Thailand. McVey, Ruth, ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1983. “Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948–1977: Explorations in Explanation.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter, eds. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Suriyamongkol, Pisan and Guyot, James F.. 1986. The Bureaucratic Polity at Bay. Public Administration Document, No. 51. Bangkok: Graduate School of Public Administration, NIDA.
Posner, Daniel N. 2004. “Measuring Ethnic Fractionalization in Africa,” American Journal of Political Science 48(4) (October):849–63.
Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Powell, G. B. and Vanberg, Georg. 2000. “Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 30(3):383–411.
Hongkrailuet, Preecha. 1981. Phakkanmuang lae banha phakkanmuang thai. (Political Parties and the Problems of Thai Political Parties.) Bangkok: Thai Watthanaphanit.
Prizzia, Ross. 1985. Thailand in Transition: The Role of Oppositional Forces. Asian Studies and Hawaii, No. 32. Hawaii: Center for Asian and Pacific Studies, University of Hawaii Press.
Jumbala, Prudhisan. 1998. “Thailand: Constitutional Reform Amidst Economic Crisis.” In Southeast Asian Affairs 1998. Singapore: ISEAS.
Putzel, James. 1993. “Democratisation and Clan Politics: The 1992 Philippine Elections.” Mimeo.
Quezon, Manuel L. 1940. Addresses of His Excellency Manuel L. Quezon on the Theory of a Partyless Democracy. Manila: Bureau of Print.
Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert. 2005. “Yellow Pad: Trapo Parties and Corruption.” BusinessWorld. October 10, 2005.
Reed, Steven R. 1994. “Democracy and the Personal Vote: A Cautionary Tale from Japan.” Electoral Studies 13:1, 17–28.
Reilly, Benjamin. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, Benjamin. 2006. Democracy and Diversity: Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Riggs, Fred W. 1966. Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76:753–66.
Riker, William H. and Peter, C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62:25–42.
Robertson, Philip S.. 1996. “The Rise of the Rural Network Politician: Will Thailand's New Elite Endure.” Asian Survey 36:9 (September 1996).
Rogers, James. 2003. “The Impact of Bicameralism on Legislative Production.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(4):509–28.
Rose, Richard. 1974. Politics in England: An Interpretation. Boston: Little Brown.
Samuels, David Julian. 1998. “Careerism and Its Consequences: Federalism, Elections and Policy-Making in Brazil.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Samuels, David Julian. 2002. “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 35(4):461–83.
Samuels, David Julian. 2003. Careerism and its Consequences: Federalism, Elections, and Policy Making in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saribo, Vincent Boulekone Viresanial. 2003. “Vincent Chronicle No. 1: Alternative Regime or Constitution Amendment?” March 30, 2003. http://www.news.vu/en/opinion/Chronicles/394.shtml. Accessed March 7, 2007.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1968. “Political Development and Political Engineering.” In Public Policy. Montgomery, John D. and Hirschman, Albert O., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1986. “The Influence of Electoral Systems: Faulty Laws or Faulty Method?” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend, eds. New York: Agathon.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. “Neither Presidentialism nor Parliamentarism.” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives. Linz, Juan and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Schattschneider, Elmer E.. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Schedler, Andreas. 1995. Under- and Overinstitutionalization: Some Ideal Typical Propositions Concerning New and Old Party Systems. Working Paper 213, Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame.
Selway, Joel Sawat. n.d. “Crosscutting Cleavages: Theory and Measurement of Social Structure.” Working paper, University of Michigan.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government.” American Political Science Review 89(2) (June):327–43.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1999. “Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Provision of Public Goods in Less-Developed Countries.” Constitutional Political Economy 10(1):53–88.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2001. “Electoral ‘efficiency’ and the move to mixed-member systems.” Electoral Studies 20(2) (June):173–93.
Shugart, Matthew S. and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sidel, John T. 1996. Capital Coercion and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Chantornvong, Sombat. 1987. “Kanluaktang kap khwamkhemkhaeng khong phakkanmuang: Khawsangkeet buangton” (The General Election and the Strength of Political Parties: Preliminary Comments). Warasaan Thammasat 6(4):77–109.
Chantornvong, Sombat. 1993. Luaktang wikrit: Panha lae thang ok (Thai Elections in Crisis: Problems and Solutions). Bangkok: Kobfai.
Chantornvong, Sombat. 1999. Interview with author. Bangkok, Thailand. March 23, 1999.
Sangchai, Somporn. 1976. Coalition Behavior in Modern Thai Politics. Occasional Paper No. 41. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Stauffer, Robert B. 1975. The Philippine Congress: Causes of Structural Change. London: Sage Publications.
Stockton, Hans. 2001. “Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia: Lessons from Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 34(1):94–119.
Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. 2001. “The Limited Reach of Russia's Party System: Underinstitutionalization in Dual Transition,” Politics and Society 29(3):385–414.
Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 1999. Interview with author. Bangkok, Thailand. February 25, 1999.
Maisrikrod, Surin. 1992. Thailand's Two General Elections in 1992: Democracy Sustained. Research Notes and Discussion Paper No. 75. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Maisrikrod, Surin and McCargo, Duncan. 1997. “Electoral Politics: Commercialisation and Exclusion.” In Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. Hewison, Kevin, ed. London: Routledge.
,SWS (Social Weather Stations). 2002. “SWS Survey: National Pride is High, But Satisfaction with Democracy Low.” SWS Media Release, July 4, 2002.
Taagepera, Rein and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tan, Paige Johnson. 2002. “Streams of Least Resistance: the Institutionalization of Political Parties and Democracy in Indonesia.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia.
Tancangco, Luzviminda. 1992. The Anatomy of Electoral Fraud. Manila: MLAGM.
Teehankee, Julio. 2002. “Electoral Politics in the Philippines.” In Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia. Croissant, Aurel and Marei, John, eds. Singapore: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
,Thai Politician. 1999. Interview with Author. Bangkok, Thailand. May 11, 1999.
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartyism.”British Journal of Political Science 25:289–325.
Tsebelis, George. 2000. “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis.” Governance 13(4):441–74.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tsebelis, George and Aleman, Eduardo. 2005. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America.”World Politics 57(3):396–420.
Tsebelis, George and Money, Jeanette. 1997. Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
George, Tsebelis and Rizova, Tatiana. 2007. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in the Former Communist Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 40(10):1155–82.
Valenzuela, Samuel J. 1992. “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transition Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions.” In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, Mainwaring, Scott, O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Valenzuela, Samuel J., eds. Notre, Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Vatikiotis, Michael. 1998. “No Quick Fix.” In The Aftershock: How an Economic Earthquake is Rattling Southeast Asia Politics. Keenan, Faith, ed. Hong Kong: Far Eastern Economic Review.
Velasco, Renato. 1999. “Philippines.” In Democracy, Governance, and Economic Performance: East and Southeast Asia. Marsh, Ian, Blondel, Jean, and Inoguchi, Takashi, eds. New York: UN Press.
Wallack, Jessica Seddon, Gaviria, Alejandra, Panizza, Ugo, and Stein, Ernesto. 2003. “Political Particularism around the World.” World Bank Economic Review 17(1):133–43.
Wallis, Darren. 2003. “Democratizing a Hegemonic Regime: From Institutionalized Party to Institutionalized Party System in Mexico?Democractization 10(3):15–38.
Wilson, David A. 1962. Politics in Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wolters, Willem. 1984. Politics, Patronage and Class Conflict in Central Luzon. Quezon City: New Day Publisher.
,World Bank Group. N.d. “Fiscal Decentralization Indicators.” http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/fiscalindicators.htm.
Wurfel, David. 1988 . Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
,WVS (World Values Survey). 2000. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/.
,WVS (World Values Survey). 2004. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.