Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T20:26:13.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - From paradigm to prototype and back again: interactive aspects of ‘cognitive processing’ in standardized survey interviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Nora Cate Schaeffer
Affiliation:
Professor Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
Douglas W. Maynard
Affiliation:
Professor Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
Hedwig te Molder
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Jonathan Potter
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Get access

Summary

Survey researchers have long been interested in the process by which answers to survey questions come about (see Schaeffer and Maynard, 2002b; Maynard and Schaeffer 2002b). The last two decades have seen considerable research on this subject. Most of this research has drawn heavily and fruitfully on social-information-processing models of the question-and-answer process, which are fundamentally psychological. These approaches commonly use one of several variants of a four-stage model of the process of responding to questions; according to the description in these models the respondent interprets the question, retrieves the requested information, evaluates the information for the purposes of reporting it, and finally maps his or her answer onto the response categories and reports an answer (see Cannell, Miller and Oksenberg, 1981; Sudman, Bradburn and Schwarz, 1996; Tourangeau, Rasinski and Rips, 2000). Such models present ‘cognitive processing’ as a psychological process that takes place within the respondent. Research based on this model has also contributed to the development of methods – such as cognitive interviewing – for improving the design of survey questions that are rooted in this psychological perspective and model. For example, the cognitive interviewing techniques of paraphrasing and ‘think-alouds’ that are used to study comprehension and information retrieval draw on psychological models to seek evidence of the cognitive processing that respondents perform, which would otherwise remain invisible (for examples, see Presser et al., 2004; Schwarz and Sudman, 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×