Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:38:48.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 2 - The Situated Brain

Introduction

from Part I - Dynamics of Culture, Mind, and Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Laurence J. Kirmayer
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Carol M. Worthman
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Shinobu Kitayama
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Robert Lemelson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Constance A. Cummings
Affiliation:
The Foundation for Psychocultural Research
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Culture, Mind, and Brain
Emerging Concepts, Models, and Applications
, pp. 159 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Damasio, A. R. (2006). Descartes’ error. Random House.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sporns, O. (2012). Discovering the human connectome. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Veissière, S. P. L., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J. D., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020). Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e90, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anderson, M. L. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Balázsi, G., van Oudenaarden, A., & Collins, J. J. (2011). Cellular decision making and biological noise: From microbes to mammals. Cell, 144(6), 910–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F., & Bar, M. (2009). See it with feeling: Affective predictions during object perceptionPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences364(1521), 1325–34. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branquinho, J. (Ed.). (2001). The foundations of cognitive science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brogaard, B., & Chomanski, B. (2015). Cognitive penetrability and high-level properties in perception: Unrelated phenomena? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(4), 469–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12111Google Scholar
Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3), 139–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-MGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207077.001.0001Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2015). Perceiving mental states. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 498507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.009Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., & Roazzi, A. (1994). The effects of context on cognition: Postcards from Brazil. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 74101). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cibelli, E., Xu, Y., Austerweil, J. L., Griffiths, T. L., & Regier, T. (2016). The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and probabilistic inference: Evidence from the domain of colorPLoS ONE11(7), e0158725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158725Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and the world together again. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2015). Embodied prediction. In Metzinger, T. & Windt, J. M. (Eds.), Open mind: MIND group. MIND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958570115Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001Google Scholar
Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordancesTheory & Psychology5(4), 467–81. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0959354395054001Google Scholar
Dedrick, D. (2015). Colour language, thought, and culture. In Sharifian, F. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 270–93). Routledge.Google Scholar
Delk, J. L., & Fillenbaum, S. (1965). Differences in perceived color as a function of characteristic colorThe American Journal of Psychology78(2), 290–3. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420503Google Scholar
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effectsBehavioral and Brain Sciences39, e229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (2009). Where is my mind? London Review of Books31(3), 1315.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2013). Active inference and free energyBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 212–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002142Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2018). Does predictive coding have a future? Nature Neuroscience, 21(8), 1019–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593–018-0200-7Google Scholar
Friston, K., Thornton, C., & Clark, A. (2012). Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problemFrontiers in Psychology3(130), 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00130Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. (2017). Discovering the social mind: Selected works of Christopher D. Frith. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2017). Ecology of the brain: The phenomenology and biology of the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulda, F. C. (2017). Natural agency: The case of bacterial cognition. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3(1), 6990. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2017.5Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Bower, M. (2014). Making enactivism even more embodied. AVANT. Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(2), 232–47. https://doi.org/10.26913/50202014.0109.0011Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., Hutto, D. D., Slaby, J., & Cole, J. (2013). The brain as part of an enactive system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 421–2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002105Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 6782). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 178200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.178Google Scholar
Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition, 78(1), 2743. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010–0277(00)00099-8Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (Ed.). (1987 ). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2012). New thinking: The evolution of human cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2091–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0111Google Scholar
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2005). Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 389405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097–005-9001-zGoogle Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Kirchhoff, M. D. (2015). Looking beyond the brain: Social neuroscience meets narrative practice. Cognitive Systems Research, 34 –35, 517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.07.001Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Basic minds without content, MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018548.001.0001Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Satne, G. (2015). The natural origins of content. Philosophia, 43(3), 521–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406–015-9644-0Google Scholar
Kay, P. (1999). ColorJournal of Linguistic Anthropology9(1–2), 32–5. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.32Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86(1), 6579. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050Google Scholar
Locke, J. C. W. (2013). Systems biology: How bacteria choose a lifestyle. Nature, 503, 476–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12837Google Scholar
Losick, R., & Desplan, C. (2008). Stochasticity and cell fate. Science, 320(5872), 65–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147888Google Scholar
Macpherson, F. (2012). Cognitive penetration of colour experience: Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(1), 2462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00481.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, F., & Newen, A. (2015). Cognitive penetrability and emotion recognition in human facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00828Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational approach. Freeman. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262514620.001.0001Google Scholar
Newen, A., & Vetter, P. (2017). Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account. Consciousness and Cognition, 47, 2637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.005Google Scholar
Newen, A., Marchi, F., & Brössel, P. (2017). Introduction – Cognitive penetration and predictive coding: Pushing the debate forward with the recent achievements of cognitive science. Consciousness and Cognition, 47, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.001Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT press.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C., Kveraga, K., Shine, J. M., Adams, R. B. Jr., & Bar, M. (2017). Predictions penetrate perception: Converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorderConsciousness and Cognition47, 6374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000115Google Scholar
Overmann, K. A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019Google Scholar
Perkins, T. J., & Swain, P. S. (2009). Strategies for cellular decision-making. Molecular Systems Biology, 5(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.83Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition?: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 341–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002022Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, A. (2001). Is perception informationally encapsulated?: The issue of the theory-ladenness of perceptionCognitive Science25(3), 423–51. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2503_4Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, A. (2015). The cognitive impenetrability of perception and theory-ladennessJournal for General Philosophy of Science46(1), 87103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838–015-9288-6Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, A. (2017). Pre-cueing, the epistemic role of early vision, and the cognitive impenetrability of early visionFrontiers in Psychology8, 1156. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2017.01156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raftopoulos, A., & Lupyan, G. (2018). Pre-cueing effects on perception and cognitive penetrabilityFrontiers in Psychology9, 230. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2018.00230Google Scholar
Ramstead, M. J. D., Veissière, S. P. L., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2016). Cultural affordances: Scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of attentionFrontiers in Psychology7, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090Google Scholar
Rauss, K., Schwartz, S., & Pourtois, G. (2011). Top-down effects on early visual processing in humans: A predictive coding frameworkNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews35(5), 1237–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.011Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions (Anderson, F., Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 2006)Google Scholar
Roepstorff, A., Niewöhner, J., & Beck, S. (2010). Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 1051–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.002Google Scholar
Shuler, M. G., & Bear, M. F. (2006). Reward timing in the primary visual cortex. Science, 311(5767), 1606–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123513Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (2012). Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Noûs, 46(2), 201–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00786.xGoogle Scholar
Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J. E., Carlyon, R. P., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perceptionJournal of Neuroscience32(25), 8443–53. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012Google Scholar
Tagkopoulos, I., Liu, Y.-C., & Tavazoie, S. (2008). Predictive behavior within microbial genetic networks. Science, 320(5881), 1313–17. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154456Google Scholar
Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J.-R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perceptionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(11), 4567–70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811155106Google Scholar
Thompson, E., Lutz, A., & Cosmelli, D. (2005). Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In Brook, A. & Atkins, K. (Eds.), Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement (pp. 4097). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610608.003Google Scholar
Toribio, J. (2018). Visual experience: Rich but impenetrableSynthese195(8), 3389–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–015-0889-8Google Scholar
Vetter, P., & Newen, A. (2014). Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 6275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (Anscombe, G. E. M., Trans.; von Wright, G. H. & Rhees, R., Eds.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1956)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (4th ed., Anscombe, G.E.M., Hacker, P. M. S., & Schulte, J., Trans., Hacker, P. M. S., & Schulte, J., Eds.). Blackwell Publishing. (Original work published 1953)Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2007). Rule-following without reasons: Wittgenstein’s quietism and the constitutive questionRatio20(4), 481502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00379.xGoogle Scholar
Zeimbekis, J., & Raftopoulos, A. (Eds.). (2015). The cognitive penetrability of perception: New philosophical perspectives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013). Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system. Brain Structure and Function, 218(3), 611–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429–012-0475-5Google Scholar
Altschul, D., Jensen, G. G., & Terrace, H. S. (2017). Perceptual category learning of photographic and painterly stimuli in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans. PLoS ONE, 12(9), e0185576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185576Google Scholar
Atzil, S., Gao, W., Fradkin, I., & Barrett, L. F. (2018). Growing a social brainNature Human Behaviour, 2, 624–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–018-0384-6Google Scholar
Atzil, S., & Gendron, M. (2017). Bio-behavioral synchrony promotes the development of conceptualized emotions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17(Supplement C), 162–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.009Google Scholar
Atzil, S., Touroutoglou, A., Rudy, T., Salcedo, S., Feldman, R., Hooker, J. M., Dickerson, B. C., Catana, C., & Barrett, L. F. (2017). Dopamine in the medial amygdala network mediates human bonding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(9), 2361–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612233114Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2017a). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2017b). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fscan%2Fnsw154Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2009). Affect as a psychological primitive. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 167218). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065–2601(08)00404-8Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Finlay, B. L. (2018). Concepts, goals and the control of survival-related behaviors. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 24, 172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.10.001Google ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F., Quigley, K. S., & Hamilton, P. (2016). An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1708), 20160011. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0011Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1999). Structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00003Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2013). Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: Towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(3), 361–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.012Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2017). Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotionNeuroscience Letters, 693, 918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.045Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(7), 419–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3950Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–27. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196968Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639Google Scholar
Bassett, D. S., & Bullmore, E. (2006). Small-world brain networks. The Neuroscientist, 12(6), 512–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858406293182Google Scholar
Beeghly, M., Bretherton, I., & Mervis, C. B. (1986). Mothers’ internal state language to toddlers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 247–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01016.xGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Minde, T., & Mok, D. (1987). Comparative studies of acculturative stress. International Migration Review, 21(3), 491511. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019791838702100303Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(Supplement 2), 10918–25. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100290108Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L. (2012). The serendipitous discovery of the brain’s default network. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1137–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.035Google Scholar
Cao, M., Huang, H., & He, Y. (2017). Developmental connectomics from infancy through early childhood. Trends in Neurosciences, 40(8), 494506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.06.003Google Scholar
Chanes, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2016). Redefining the role of limbic areas in cortical processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 96106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.005Google Scholar
Chen, M. L., & Waxman, S. R. (2013). “Shall we blick?”: Novel words highlight actors’ underlying intentions for 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 426–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029486Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477Google Scholar
Colombetti, G., & Krueger, J. (2015). Scaffoldings of the affective mind. Journal of Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1157–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.976334Google Scholar
Conant, R. C., & Ashby, W. R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 8997. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207727008920220Google Scholar
Consedine, N. S., Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., & Krivoshekova, Y. S. (2014). Emotional acculturation predicts better somatic health: Experiential and expressive acculturation among immigrant women from four ethnic groups. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(10), 867–89. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.10.867Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel – now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 5970. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2014). How do you feel? An interoceptive moment with your neurobiological self. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691156767.001.0001Google Scholar
Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7(2), 189–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1176Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness: Harcourt College.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815Google Scholar
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2011). Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(1), 4356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2961Google Scholar
De Leersnyder, J. (2017). Emotional acculturation: A first review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 6773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.007Google Scholar
De Leersnyder, J., Kim, H., & Mesquita, B. (2015). Feeling right is feeling good: Psychological well-being and emotional fit with culture in autonomy-versus relatedness-promoting situations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00630Google Scholar
De Leersnyder, J., Mesquita, B., & Kim, H. S. (2011). Where do my emotions belong? A study of immigrants’ emotional acculturation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 451–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399103Google Scholar
De Leersnyder, J., Mesquita, B., Kim, H., Eom, K., & Choi, H. (2014). Emotional fit with culture: A predictor of individual differences in relational well-being. Emotion, 14(2), 241–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035296Google Scholar
Doamekpor, L. A., & Dinwiddie, G. Y. (2015). Allostatic load in foreign-born and US-born blacks: Evidence from the 2001–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), 591–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doan, S. N., & Wang, Q. (2010). Maternal discussions of mental states and behaviors: Relations to emotion situation knowledge in European American and immigrant Chinese children. Child Development, 81(5), 1490–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01487.xGoogle Scholar
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Nardos, B., Cohen, A. L., Fair, D. A., Power, J. D., Church, J. A., Nelson, S. M., Wig, G. S., Vogel, A. C., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N., Barnes, K. A., Dubis, J. W., Feczko, E., Coalson, R. S., Pruett, J. R. Jr., Barch, D. M., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2010). Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science, 329(5997), 1358–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194144Google Scholar
Dreyfus, G., & Thompson, E. (2007). Asian perspectives: Indian theories of mind. In Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M., & Thompson, E. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 89114). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, J., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Kulikova, S., Poupon, C., Hüppi, P. S., & Hertz-Pannier, L. (2014). The early development of brain white matter: A review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience, 276, 4871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044Google Scholar
Dunn, J., Bretherton, I., & Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 132–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.1.132Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(21), 8099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007Google Scholar
Ferry, A. L., Hespos, S. J., & Waxman, S. R. (2010). Categorization in 3- and 4-month-old infants: An advantage of words over tones. Child Development, 81(2), 472–9. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8624.2009.01408.xGoogle Scholar
Finlay, B. L., & Uchiyama, R. (2015). Developmental mechanisms channeling cortical evolution. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(2), 6976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.11.004Google Scholar
Finlay, B., & Uchiyama, R. (2017). The timing of brain maturation, early experience, and the human social niche. In Kaas, J. H. (Ed.), Evolution of nervous systems (2nd ed., pp. 123–48). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 5160. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00784.2009Google Scholar
Fransson, P., Åden, U., Blennow, M., & Lagercrantz, H. (2011). The functional architecture of the infant brain as revealed by resting-state fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 21(1), 145–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq071Google Scholar
Fransson, P., Skiöld, B., Horsch, S., Nordell, A., Blennow, M., Lagercrantz, H., & Åden, U. (2007). Resting-state networks in the infant brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(39), 15531–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704380104Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787Google Scholar
Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., & Pezzulo, G. (2017). Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation, 29(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00912Google Scholar
Fulmer, C. A., Gelfand, M. J., Kruglanski, A. W., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Pierro, A., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). On “feeling right” in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1563–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384742Google Scholar
Gao, W., Gilmore, J. H., Giovanello, K. S., Smith, J. K., Shen, D., Zhu, H., & Lin, W. (2011). Temporal and spatial evolution of brain network topology during the first two years of life. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025278Google Scholar
Gao, W., Lin, W., Chen, Y., Gerig, G., Smith, J. K., Jewells, V., & Gilmore, J. H. (2009). Temporal and spatial development of axonal maturation and myelination of white matter in the developing brain. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(2), 290–6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1363Google Scholar
Gao, W., Lin, W., Grewen, K., & Gilmore, J. H. (2017). Functional connectivity of the infant human brain: Plastic and modifiable. The Neuroscientist, 23(2), 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858416635986Google Scholar
Gao, W., Zhu, H., Giovanello, K. S., Smith, J. K., Shen, D., Gilmore, J. H., & Lin, W. (2009). Evidence on the emergence of the brain’s default network from 2-week-old to 2-year-old healthy pediatric subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6790–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811221106Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Neberich, W. (2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment: On the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23(2), 158–60. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797611427045Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D’Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., … Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2009). Learning from others: Children’s construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 115–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093659Google Scholar
Gendron, M., Crivelli, C., & Barrett, L. F. (2018). Universality reconsidered: Diversity in meaning making about facial expressions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 211–19. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963721417746794Google Scholar
Geng, X., Li, G., Lu, Z., Gao, W., Wang, L., Shen, D., & Gilmore, J. H. (2017). Structural and maturational covariance in early childhood brain development. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1795–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw022Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461–90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145221Google Scholar
Güngör, D., Bornstein, M. H., De Leersnyder, J., Cote, L., Ceulemans, E., & Mesquita, B. (2013). Acculturation of personality: A three-culture study of Japanese, Japanese Americans, and European Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(5), 701–18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022022112470749Google Scholar
Heelas, P. (1996). Emotion talk across cultures. In Harré, R. & Parrott, W. G. (Eds.), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions (pp. 171–99). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221952.n12Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (2004). Move the body, change the self: Acculturative effects on the self-concept. In Schaller, M. & Crandall, C. S. (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 305–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Derex, M., Kline, M. A., Mesoudi, A., Muthukrishna, M., Powell, A. T., Shennan, S. J., & Thomas, M. G. (2016). Understanding cumulative cultural evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(44), E6724E6725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610005113Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 6183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152XGoogle Scholar
Hermundstad, A. M., Bassett, D. S., Brown, K. S., Aminoff, E. M., Clewett, D., Freeman, S., Frithsen, A., Johnson, A., Tipper, C. M., Miller, M. B., Grafton, S. T., & Carlson, J. M. (2013). Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 6169–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219562110Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, L. W. (2013). The myth of mentalizing and the primacy of folk sociology. In Banaji, M. R. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 101–6). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoemann, K., Wu, R., LobBue, V., Oakes, L. M., Xu, F., & Barrett, L. F. (2020). Developing an understanding of emotion categories: Lessons from objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.010Google Scholar
Hoemann, K., Xu, F., & Barrett, L. F. (2019). Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis. Developmental Psychology, 55, 1830–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000686Google Scholar
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001Google Scholar
Honey, C., Sporns, O., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Thiran, J.-P., Meuli, R., & Hagmann, P. (2009). Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(6), 2035–40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811168106Google Scholar
Hong, Y.-y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. B., & Barrett, L. F. (2019). The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 280–91. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963721419831992Google Scholar
Hyman, I. (2004). Setting the stage: Reviewing current knowledge on the health of Canadian immigrants: What is the evidence and where are the gaps? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 95(3), I4I8. www.jstor.org/stable/41994328Google Scholar
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2007). Précis of evolution in four dimensions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(4), 353–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002221Google Scholar
James, W. (2007). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Dover and Cosimo. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
Juster, R.-P., McEwen, B. S., & Lupien, S. J. (2010). Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002Google Scholar
Kan, I. P., Barsalou, L. W., Solomon, K. O., Minor, J. K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Role of mental imagery in a property verification task: fMRI evidence for perceptual representations of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 525–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000257Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., Barrett, L. F., & McKnight, P. E. (2015). Unpacking emotion differentiation: Transforming unpleasant experience by perceiving distinctions in negativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 1016. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963721414550708Google Scholar
Keck, T., Keller, G. B., Jacobsen, R. I., Eysel, U. T., Bonhoeffer, T., & Hübener, M. (2013). Synaptic scaling and homeostatic plasticity in the mouse visual cortex in vivo. Neuron, 80(2), 327–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.018Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 890903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Salvador, C. E. (2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 841–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707317Google Scholar
Kleckner, I. R., Zhang, J., Touroutoglou, A., Chanes, L., Xia, C., Simmons, W. K., Quigley, K. S., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2017). Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–017-0069Google Scholar
Korte, S. M., Koolhaas, J. M., Wingfield, J. C., & McEwen, B. S. (2005). The Darwinian concept of stress: Benefits of allostasis and costs of allostatic load and the trade-offs in health and disease. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29(1), 338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.08.009Google Scholar
Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 1434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 917–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030811Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 23(1), 131–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002417Google Scholar
Levy, R. I. (1975). Tahitians: Mind and experience in the Society Islands. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (2000). The triple helix: Gene, organism, and environment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lillard, A. (1998). Ethnopsychologies: Cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.3Google Scholar
Lindquist, K. A., Gendron, M., Oosterwijk, S., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). Do people essentialize emotions? Individual differences in emotion essentialism and emotional experience. Emotion, 13(4), 629–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032283Google Scholar
Lindquist, K. A., Satpute, A. B., Wager, T. D., Weber, J., & Barrett, L. F. (2016). The brain basis of positive and negative affect: Evidence from a meta-analysis of the human neuroimaging literature. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 1910–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv001Google Scholar
Linnet, J. T. (2011). Money can’t buy me hygge: Danish middle-class consumption, egalitarianism, and the sanctity of inner space. Social Analysis, 55(2), 2144. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550202Google Scholar
Lipo, C. P., O’Brien, M. J., Collard, M., & Shennan, S. (2006). Mapping our ancestors: Phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. New Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Lochmann, T., & Den, ève, S. (2011). Neural processing as causal inference. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 21(5), 774–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.018Google Scholar
Low, L. K., & Cheng, H.-J. (2006). Axon pruning: An essential step underlying the developmental plasticity of neuronal connections. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1473), 1531–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1883Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
McEwen, B. S. (2005). Stressed or stressed out: What is the difference? Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 30(5), 315–18. http://jpn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/30-5-315.pdfGoogle Scholar
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Comments on part I: Psychological essentialism. In Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–96). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.009Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(4), 329–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009083Google Scholar
Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 6874. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.68Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., & Boiger, M. (2014). Emotions in context: A sociodynamic model of emotions. Emotion Review, 6(4), 298302. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1754073914534480Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., De Leersnyder, J., & Jasini, A. (2019). The cultural psychology of acculturation. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 179204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179Google Scholar
Mithen, S., & Parsons, L. (2008). The brain as a cultural artefact. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(3), 415–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000450Google Scholar
Mitra, A., & Raichle, M. E. (2016). How networks communicate: Propagation patterns in spontaneous brain activity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1705), 20150546. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0546Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2016). Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150192. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0192Google Scholar
Nguyen, A.-M. D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111435097Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1120–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015574Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oosterwijk, S., Mackey, S., Wilson-Mendenhall, C., Winkielman, P., & Paulus, M. P. (2015). Concepts in context: Processing mental state concepts with internal or external focus involves different neural systems. Social Neuroscience, 10(3), 294307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.998840Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 125–60). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2014). The bilingual mind: And what it tells us about language and thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peek, M. K., Cutchin, M. P., Salinas, J. J., Sheffield, K. M., Eschbach, K., Stowe, R. P., & Goodwin, J. S. (2010). Allostatic load among non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and people of Mexican origin: Effects of ethnicity, nativity, and acculturation. American Journal of Public Health, 100(5), 940–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.129312Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. (2015). Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control. Progress in Neurobiology, 134, 1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.001Google Scholar
Pouliasi, K., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Understanding the relational self: An inter-generational study in the Netherlands and Greece. European Psychologist, 17(3), 182–9. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000095Google Scholar
Ramstead, M. J. D., Veissière, S. P. L., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2016). Cultural affordances: Scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2016.01090Google Scholar
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 7987. https://doi.org/10.1038/4580Google Scholar
Rebollo, I., Devauchelle, A-D., Béranger, B., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2018). Stomach-brain synchrony reveals delayed-connectivity resting-state network in humans. eLIFE, 7, e33321. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33321.001Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–78. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0077714Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 426–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.426Google Scholar
Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (2010). Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 472–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610373075Google Scholar
Savani, K., Morris, M. W., Naidu, N. V. R., Kumar, S., & Berlia, N. V. (2011). Cultural conditioning: Understanding interpersonal accommodation in India and the United States in terms of the modal characteristics of interpersonal influence situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 84102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021083Google Scholar
Schulkin, J. (2010). Social allostasis: Anticipatory regulation of the internal milieu. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 2, 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2010.00111Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2004). Mind: A brief introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. A., & Greicius, M. D. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–56. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007Google Scholar
Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 565–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007Google Scholar
Seth, A. K., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2012). An interoceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00395Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J. J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Miller, P. J. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 865937). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Siegel, E. H., Sands, M. K., Van den Noortgate, W., Condon, P., Chang, Y., Dy, J., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2018). Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categoriesPsychological Bulletin, 144(4), 343–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000128Google Scholar
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3–4), 233–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409189Google Scholar
Smyser, C. D., Snyder, A. Z., & Neil, J. J. (2011). Functional connectivity MRI in infants: Exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1437–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.073Google Scholar
Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the brain. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spratling, M. W. (2017). A review of predictive coding algorithms. Brain and Cognition, 112, 92–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.003Google Scholar
Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior, 106(1), 515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004Google Scholar
Sterling, P., & Eyer, J. (1988). Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In Fisher, S. & Reason, J. (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health (pp. 629–49). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sterling, P., & Laughlin, S. (2015). Principles of neural design. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. (2006). The human brain is a cultural artefact. Edge: What is your dangerous idea? www.edge.org/response-detail/11835Google Scholar
Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2019). The sense of should: A biologically based model of social pressure. PsyArXiv. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x5rbsGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 187–94. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fejsp.2015Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., Townsend, S. S. M., Markus, H. R., & Bergsieker, H. B. (2009). Emotions as within or between people? Cultural variation in lay theories of emotion expression and inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1427–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209347322Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, M. P., & Sporns, O. (2013). Network hubs in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(12), 683–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012Google Scholar
Vilares, I., & Kording, K. (2011). Bayesian models: The structure of the world, uncertainty, behavior, and the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 2239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05965.x.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, S. A. (2010). Different kinds of concepts and different kinds of words: What words do for human cognition. In Mareschal, D., Quinn, P. C., & Lea, S. E. G. (Eds.), Oxford series in developmental neuroscience. The making of human concepts (pp. 101–30). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549221.003.06Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1105–27. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology (Judd, C. H., Trans.). Wilhelm Engelmann and Gustav E. Stechert. (Original work published 1896)Google Scholar
Yeo, B. T. T., Krienen, F. M., Eickhoff, S. B., Yaakub, S. N., Fox, P. T., Buckner, R. L., Asplund, C. L., & Chee, M. W. L. (2015). Functional specialization and flexibility in human association cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 25(10), 3654–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu217Google Scholar

References

Blakemore, S. J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267–77. https://doi.org/10.11038/nrn2353Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 8393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83Google Scholar
Bromm, B., & Chen, A. C. N. (1995). Brain electrical source analysis of laser evoked potentials in response to painful trigeminal nerve stimulation. Electroencephalography of Clinical Neurophysiology, 95(1), 1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(95)00032-TGoogle Scholar
Cheon, B. K., Im, D.-m., Harada, T., Kim, J.-S., Mathur, V. A., Scimeca, J. M., Parrish, T. B., Park, H. W., & Chiao, J. Y. (2011). Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. NeuroImage, 57(2), 642–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiao, J. Y., & Ambady, N. (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In: Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 237–54). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D., Parrish, T. B., Sadato, N., & Iidaka, T. (2009). Dynamic cultural influences on neural representations of the self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 111. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21192Google Scholar
Christmann, C., Koeppe, C., Braus, D., Ruf, M., & Flora, H. (2007). A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study of painful electrical stimulation. NeuroImage, 34, 1428–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.006Google Scholar
Colzato, L. S., de Bruijn, E. R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00341Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). ‘I’ value freedom, but ‘we’ value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00162Google Scholar
Han, S. (2015). Understanding cultural differences in human behavior: A cultural neuroscience approach. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 6872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.013Google Scholar
Han, S. (2017). The sociocultural brain: A cultural neuroscience approach to human nature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2016). Self-construal: A cultural framework for brain function. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.013Google Scholar
Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2014). Cultural differences in human brain activity: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 99, 293300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062Google Scholar
Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2015). A culture-behavior-brain loop model of human development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 666–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.010Google Scholar
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(8), 646–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2456Google Scholar
Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B. E., Kitayama, S., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2013). A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 335–59. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629Google Scholar
Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02038.xGoogle Scholar
Hong, Y.-y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–20. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.7.709Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Wan, C., No, S., & Chiu, C-.y. (2007). Multicultural identities. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 323–46). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Yanagisawa, K., Ito, A., Ueda, R., Uchida, Y., & Abe, N. (2017). Reduced orbitofrontal cortical volume is associated with interdependent self-construal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30), 7969–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704831114Google Scholar
Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(5), 492–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00011-2Google Scholar
Lin, Z., & Han, S. (2009). Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 802–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802271650Google Scholar
Lin, Z., Lin, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception. Biological Psychology, 77(1), 93–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, S., Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Li, B., Wang, C., Shi, Z., Li, X., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2015). Interaction between oxytocin receptor polymorphism and interdependent culture on human empathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1273–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv019Google Scholar
Luo, S., Yu, D., & Han, S. (2017). 5-HTTLPR moderates the association between interdependence and brain responses to mortality threats. Human Brain Mapping, 38(12), 6157–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23819Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Bang, D., Wang, C., Allen, M., Frith, C., Roepstorff, A., & Han, S. (2014). Sociocultural patterning of neural activity during self-reflection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 7380. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss103Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Wang, C., Li, B., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Does self-construal predict activity in the social brain network? A genetic moderation effect. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1360–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst125Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Hamedani, M. G. (2007). Sociocultural psychology: The dynamic interdependence among self systems and social systems. In Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 339). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557Google Scholar
Martínez, A., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Frank, L. R., Buxton, R. B., Dubowitz, D. J., Wong, E. C., Hinrichs, H., Heinze, H. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2(4), 364–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/7274CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. NeuroImage, 51(4), 1468–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Y. (2013). Culture and analytic versus holistic cognition: Toward multilevel analysis of cultural influences. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 131–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00003-6Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Kitayama, S., Han, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15348–53. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112Google Scholar
Ng, S. H., Han, S., Mao, L., & Lai, J. C. L. (2010). Dynamic bicultural brains: fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 8391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01303.xGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. H., & Lai, J. C. L. (2009). Effects of culture priming on the social connectedness of the bicultural self: A self-reference effect approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 170–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108328818Google Scholar
Oyserman, D. (2011). Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 164214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.627187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2007). Priming “culture”: Culture as situated cognition. In Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D.. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 255–79). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Novin, S., Flinkenflögel, N., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Integrating culture-as-situated-cognition and neuroscience prediction models. Culture and Brain, 2(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-014-0016-6Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peyron, R., Laurent, B., & García-Larrea, L. (2000). Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiologie Clinique, 30(5), 263–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00227-6Google Scholar
Shaw, C., & McEachern, J. (Eds.). (2001). Toward a theory of neuroplasticity. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sui, J., & Han, S. (2007). Self-construal priming modulates neural substrates of self-awareness. Psychological Science, 18(10), 861–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01992.xGoogle Scholar
Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Chiu, C.-y. (2007). Bicultural mind, self-construal, and self-and-mother reference effects: Consequences of cultural priming on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 818–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.005Google Scholar
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649Google Scholar
United Nations. (2018). 2018 Revision of world urbanization prospects. New York, NY: Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3(3), 177–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000001Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W., Shi, Z., Chen, A., Qiu, J., & Han, S. (2014). When “your” reward is the same as “my” reward: Self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friends’ rewards. NeuroImage, 87, 164–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.042Google Scholar
Wang, C., Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Self-construal priming modulates pain perception: Event-related potential evidence. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 39. http://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.797388Google Scholar
Wang, C., Oyserman, D., Liu, Q., Li, H., & Han, S. (2013). Accessible cultural mind-set modulates default mode activity: Evidence for the culturally situated brain. Social Neuroscience, 8(3), 203–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.775966Google Scholar
Wang, C., Oyserman, D., Liu, Q., Li, H., & Han, S. (2015). Challenging emotional prejudice by changing self-concept: Priming independent self-construal reduces racial in-group bias in neural responses to other’s pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1195–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv005Google Scholar
Wang, F., Peng, K., Chechlacz, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2017). The neural basis of independence versus interdependence orientations: A voxel-based morphometric analysis of brain volume. Psychological Science, 28(4), 519–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689079Google Scholar
Wong, R. Y.-M., & Hong, Y.-y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16(6), 429–34. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01552.xGoogle Scholar
Zaslansky, R., Sprecher, E., Tenke, C. E., Hemli, J. A., & Yarnitsky, D. (1996). The P300 in pain evoked potentials. Pain, 66(1), 3949. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(96)03020-5Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1310–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047Google Scholar

References

Azuma, H. (1984). Secondary control as a heterogeneous category. American Psychologist, 39(9): 970–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.970Google Scholar
Bart, V. K. E., Sharavdorj, E., Bazarvaani, K., Munkhbat, T., Wenke, D., & Rieger, M. (2019). It was me: The use of sense of agency cues differs between culturesFrontiers in Psychology10, 650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00650Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Free will in scientific psychologyPerspectives on Psychological Science3(1), 1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00057.xGoogle Scholar
Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., & Haggard, P. (2017). Beyond self-serving bias: Diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoringSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience12(1), 138–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw160Google Scholar
Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 556–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3292Google Scholar
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784Google Scholar
Brass, M., Lynn, M. T., Demanet, J., & Rigoni, D. (2013). Imaging volition: What the brain can tell us about the willExperimental Brain Research229(3), 301–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3472-xGoogle Scholar
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (2013). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buhrmann, T., & Di Paolo, E. (2017). The sense of agency – A phenomenological consequence of enacting sensorimotor schemesPhenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences16(2), 207–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9446–7Google Scholar
Chambon, V., Sidarus, N., & Haggard, P. (2014). From action intentions to action effects: How does the sense of agency come about? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8, 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00320Google Scholar
Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Sheldon, K. M. (Eds.). (2011). Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and people’s well-being. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8Google Scholar
Christensen, J. F., Di Costa, S., Beck, B., & Haggard, P. (2019). I just lost it! Fear and anger reduce the sense of agency: A study using intentional bindingExperimental Brain Research, 237(5), 1205–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5461-6Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
David, N. (2012). New frontiers in the neuroscience of the sense of agencyFrontiers in Human Neuroscience6, 161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00161Google Scholar
David, N., Newen, A., & Vogeley, K. (2008). The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanismsConsciousness and Cognition17(2), 523–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004Google Scholar
Deeley, Q., Oakley, D. A., Walsh, E., Bell, V., Mehta, M. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2014). Modelling psychiatric and cultural possession phenomena with suggestion and fMRICortex53, 107–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.004Google Scholar
Dogge, M., Schaap, M., Custers, R., Wegner, D. M., & Aarts, H. (2012). When moving without volition: Implied self-causation enhances binding strength between involuntary actions and effectsConsciousness and Cognition21(1), 501–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.014Google Scholar
Edge, H., & Suryani, L. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of volition. Florida Philosophical Review, 2 (2), 5672.Google Scholar
Fallin, M., Whooley, O., & Barker, K. K. (2018). Criminalizing the brain: Neurocriminology and the production of strategic ignorance. BioSocieties, 1–25. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-018-0135-yGoogle Scholar
Fausey, C. M., Long, B. L., Inamori, A., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Constructing agency: The role of language. Frontiers of Psychology, 1, 162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00162Google Scholar
Feldman, G. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important constructSocial and Personality Psychology Compass11(1), e12293. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12293Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. (2014). Action, agency and responsibilityNeuropsychologia55, 137–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.007Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001Google Scholar
Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). The physiology of willpower: Linking blood glucose to self-controlPersonality and Social Psychology Review11(4), 303–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307303030Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Actions, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4_3Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Franco, M., & Lanier, J. (2017). Model of illusions and virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology8, 1125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01125Google Scholar
Greely, H. T., & Farahany, N. A. (2019). Neuroscience and the criminal justice systemAnnual Review of Criminology2, 451–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024433Google Scholar
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000093Google Scholar
Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brainNature Reviews Neuroscience18(4), 196207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.14Google Scholar
Haggard, P., & Eitam, B. (Eds.). (2015). The sense of agency. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190267278.001.0001Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. (1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action (Expanded ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Ismail, M. A. F., & Shimada, S. (2016). ‘Robot’ hand illusion under delayed visual feedback: Relationship between the senses of ownership and agencyPLoS ONE11(7), e0159619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159619Google Scholar
Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion – Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulationPsychological Science21(11), 1686–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384745Google Scholar
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision taskScience310(5745), 116–19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111709Google Scholar
Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2528.001.0001Google Scholar
Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agencyFrontiers in Human Neuroscience6, 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J. (1990). Resistance, reactance, and reluctance to change: A cognitive attributional approach to strategic interventionsJournal of Cognitive Psychotherapy4(2), 83104.Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J., & Gómez-Carrillo, A. (2019). Agency, embodiment and enactment in psychosomatic theory and practiceMedical Humanities, 45(2), 169–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011618Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J., & Ramstead, M. J. D. (2017). Embodiment and enactment in cultural psychiatry. In Durt, C., Fuchs, T., & Tewes, C. (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 397422). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035552.003.0021Google Scholar
Kokkinara, E., Kilteni, K., Blom, K. J., & Slater, M. (2016). First person perspective of seated participants over a walking virtual body leads to illusory agency over the walkingScientific Reports6, 28879. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28879Google Scholar
Kpanake, L. (2018). Cultural concepts of the person and mental health in Africa. Transcultural Psychiatry55(2), 198218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461517749435Google Scholar
Kushnir, T. (2018). The developmental and cultural psychology of free willPhilosophy Compass13(11), e12529. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12529Google Scholar
Lee, B. O. (2016). Transformation in dang-ki healing: The embodied self and perceived legitimacyCulture, Medicine, and Psychiatry40(3), 422–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-016-9497-4Google Scholar
Lee, B.-O., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2019). Dang-ki healing: An embodied relational healing practice in Singapore. Transcultural Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1363461519858448Google Scholar
Lee, B. O., Kirmayer, L. J., & Groleau, D. (2010). Therapeutic processes and perceived helpfulness of dang-ki (Chinese shamanism) from the symbolic healing perspectiveCulture, Medicine, and Psychiatry34(1), 56105.Google Scholar
Lenggengager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439Google Scholar
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential): The unconscious initiation of freely voluntary act. Brain, 106(3), 623–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623Google Scholar
Lynn, S. J., Rhue, J. W., & Weekes, J. R. (1990). Hypnotic involuntariness: A social cognitive analysis. Psychological Review, 97(2), 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.169Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitutionPerspectives on Psychological Science5(4), 420–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557Google Scholar
Maurer, C. W., LaFaver, K., Ameli, R., Epstein, S. A., Hallett, M., & Horovitz, S. G. (2016). Impaired self-agency in functional movement disorders: A resting-state fMRI studyNeurology87(6), 564–70. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002940Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2016, March 1). The brain gets its day in court. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/03/neurolaw-brain-scans-court/471615Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt, Reinhart, Winston. https://doi.org/10.1037/10039-000Google Scholar
Miller, P. J., Koven, M., & Lin, S. (2011). Language socialization and narrative. In Durant, A., Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (Eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 190208). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch8Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., Kross, E., Teslovich, T., Wilson, N. L., Zayas, V., & Shoda, Y. (2010). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulationSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience6(2), 252–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq081Google Scholar
Moore, J. W. (2016). What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology7, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moretto, G., Walsh, E., & Haggard, P. (2011). Experience of agency and sense of responsibilityConsciousness and Cognition20(4), 1847–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.014Google Scholar
Nahab, F. B., Kundu, P., Maurer, C., Shen, Q., & Hallett, M. (2017). Impaired sense of agency in functional movement disorders: An fMRI studyPLoS ONE12(4), e0172502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172502Google Scholar
Oerter, R., Oerter, R., Agostiani, H., Kim, H. O., & Wibowo, S. (1996). The concept of human nature in East Asia: Etic and emic characteristicsCulture & Psychology2(1), 951. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9621002Google Scholar
Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2016). Automatic self-regulation: From habit to goal pursuit. In Vohs, K. & Baumeister, R.F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (3rd ed., pp. 203–22). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., Woody, E. Z., & Connors, M. H. (2014). Measuring agency change across the domain of hypnosisPsychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 319. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000010Google Scholar
Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Aldine.Google Scholar
Raine, A. (2019). A neurodevelopmental perspective on male violence. Infant Mental Health 40(1), 8497. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21761Google Scholar
Ramstead, M. J., Veissière, S. P., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2016). Cultural affordances: Scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of attentionFrontiers in Psychology7, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saigle, V., Dubljević, V., & Racine, E. (2018). The impact of a landmark neuroscience study on free will: A qualitative analysis of articles using Libet and colleagues’ methodsAJOB Neuroscience9(1), 2941. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2018.1425756Google Scholar
Seligman, R., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2008). Dissociative experience and cultural neuroscience: Narrative, metaphor and mechanismCulture, Medicine and Psychiatry32(1), 3164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-007-9077-8Google Scholar
Seth, A. K., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2012). An interoceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00395Google Scholar
Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3(2), 214–20. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Fneuro.01.029.2009Google Scholar
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agencyConsciousness and Cognition17(1), 219–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2006). Why? What happens when people give reasons … and why. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Veissière, S. P., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020). Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and cultureBehavioral and Brain Sciences43, e90: 175. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X19001213Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (2003). The mind’s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(2), 65–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613%2803%2900002-0Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Gilbert, D., & Wheatley, T. (2017). The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11151.001.0001Google Scholar
Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and JapanAmerican Psychologist39(9), 955–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.955Google Scholar
Wikan, U. (1990). Managing turbulent hearts: A Balinese formula for living. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×