Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T11:33:59.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two primitive trematopid amphibians (Temnospondyli, Dissorophoidea) from the Upper Carboniferous of the Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Abstract

Specimens of trematopid amphibians from the Asturian (Upper Carboniferous) of Nýřany, Czech Republic, are redescribed as two taxa, namely Mordex calliprepes Steen and Mattauschia (gen. nov) laticeps Fritsch. Mordex calliprepes is represented by a single post-metamorphic specimen and has the diagnostic trematopid characters of the nasal region. Mattauschia laticeps is represented by one adult partial skull and mandible plus some fragments and two small post-metamorphic specimens including the species name-bearer. It has the trematopid-type modified lacrimal and a large but oval naris and appears to be the most primitive trematopid yet described. The stratigraphically sequential large trematopids Mattauschia, Fedexia, Ecolsonia and Acheloma show progressive acquisition of the derived features that characterise the terminal form Acheloma.

Mordex has a combination of primitive and derived characters and its position within the family is less clear. The many ‘branchiosaurs' in the Nýřany assemblage include specimens that could be larvae of both Mordex and Mattauschia but certain attribution is not possible and they are assigned to Olsoniformes incertae sedis. Mordex and Mattauschia appear to be terrestrial exotic elements in the Nýřany tetrapod assemblage, but with possible larvae in the lake assemblage. Representatives of at least four Palaeozoic dissorophoid families were present in late Middle Pennsylvanian/Asturian strata implying diversification of the Dissorophoidea prior to this time.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

10. References

Anderson, J. S., Henrici, A. C., Sumida, S. S., Martens, T. & Berman, D. S. 2008. Georgenthalia clavinasica, a new genus and species of dissorophoid temnospondyl from the Early Permian of Germany, and the relationships of the family Amphibamidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28, 6175.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Reisz, R. R. & Fracasso, M. A. 1981. Skull of the Lower Permian dissorophid amphibian Platyhistrix rugosus. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 50, 391416.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Reisz, R. R. & Eberth, D. A. 1985. Ecolsonia cutlerensis, an early Permian dissorophid amphibian from the Cutler Formation of north-central New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Circular 191, 131.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Reisz, R. R. & Eberth, D. A. 1987. A new genus and species of trematopid amphibian from the Late Pennsylvanian of north-central New Mexico. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 7, 252269.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Henrici, A. C., Brezinski, D. K. & Kollar, A. D. 2010. A new trematopid amphibian (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea) from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Western Pennsylvania: earliest record of terrestrial vertebrates responding to a warmer dryer climate. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 78, 289318.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Henrici, A. C., Martens, T., Sumida, S. S. & Anderson, J. S. 2011. Rotaryus gothae, new trematopid amphibian from the Lower Permian of Central Germany. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 80, 4965.Google Scholar
Bolt, J. R. 1969. Lissamphibian origins: possible protolissamphibian from the Lower Permian of Oklahoma. Science 166, 888891.Google Scholar
Bolt, J. R. 1974a. Osteology, function and evolution of the trematopsid (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia) nasal region. Fieldiana: Geology 33, 1130.Google Scholar
Bolt, J. R. 1974b. A trematopsid skull from the Lower Permian, and analysis of some characters of the dissorophoid (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia) otic notch. Fieldiana: Geology 30, 6779.Google Scholar
Bolt, J. R. & Lombard, R. E. 1985. Evolution of the amphibian tympanic ear and the origin of frogs. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 24, 8399.Google Scholar
Boy, J. A. 1972. Die Branchiosaurier (Amphibia) des saarpfalzischen Rotliegenden (Perm., SW-Deutschland). Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung 65, 1–137.Google Scholar
Boy, J. A. 1981. Zur Anwendung der Hennigschen Methode in der Wirbeltierpaläontologie. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 55, 87107.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1964. Early evolution of the dissorophid amphibians. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 131, 161250.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. & Milner, A. R. 1994. Platyrhinops from the Upper Carboniferous of Linton and Nýřany and the family Amphibamidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). In Heidtke, U. (ed.) New research on Permo-Carboniferous faunas. Pollichia-Buch 29 (for 1993), 185191.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. & Milner, A. R. 2010. Morphology and systematics of the Pennsylvanian amphibian Platyrhinops lyelli (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 100, 275295.Google Scholar
Daly, E. 1994. The Amphibamidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli), with a description of a new genus from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Kansas. Miscellaneous Publications of the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History 85, 159.Google Scholar
Demar, R. E. 1966. The phylogenetic and functional implications of the armor of the Dissorophidae. Fieldiana: Geology 16, 5588.Google Scholar
Demar, R. E. 1968. The Permian labyrinthodont amphibian Dissorophus multicinctus, and adaptions and phylogeny of the family Dissorophidae. Journal of Paleontology 42, 12101242.Google Scholar
Dilkes, D. W. 1990. A new trematopsid amphibian (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea) from the Lower Permian of Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 10, 222243.Google Scholar
Dilkes, D. W. 1993. Biology and evolution of the nasal region in trematopid amphibians. Palaeontology 36, 839853.Google Scholar
Dilkes, D. W. & Reisz, R. R. 1987. Trematops milleri Williston, 1909 identified as a junior synonym of Acheloma cumminsi Cope, 1882, with a revision of the genus. American Museum Novitates 2902, 112.Google Scholar
Eaton, T. H. 1973. A Pennsylvanian dissorophid amphibian from Kansas. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 14, 18.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1879. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens. Band. 1, Heft. 1. Prague: Řivnáč.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1881. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens. Band. 1, Heft. 3. Prague: Řivnáč.Google Scholar
Fröbisch, N. B. & Reisz, R. R. 2012. A new species of dissorophid (Cacops woerhri) from the Lower Permian Dolese Quarry, near Richards Spur, Oklahoma. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32, 3544.Google Scholar
Gee, B. M., Haridy, Y. & Reisz, R. R. 2017. Histological characterization of denticulate palatal plates in an early Permian dissorophoid. PeerJ 5, e3727.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. T. 1950. Tetrapods of the Pennsylvanian nodules from Mazon Creek, Illinois. American Journal of Science 248, 833873.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae, 10th edn. Volume 1. Stockholm: Salvi.Google Scholar
Maddin, H. C., Fröbisch, N., Evans, D. C. & Milner, A. R. 2013. Reappraisal of the Early Permian amphibamid Tersomius texensis and some referred material. Comptes Rendues Palevol 12, 447461.Google Scholar
May, W., Huttenlocker, A. K., Pardo, J. D., Benca, J. & Small, B. J. 2011. New Upper Pennsylvanian armored dissorophid records (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea) from the U.S. Mid-continent and the stratigraphic distributions of dissorophids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31, 907910.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1980. The tetrapod assemblage from Nýřany, Czechoslovakia. In Panchen, A. L. (ed.) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates, 439496. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1982a. Small temnospondyl amphibians from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Illinois. Palaeontology 25, 635664.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1982b. A small temnospondyl amphibian from the Lower Pennsylvanian of Nova Scotia. Journal of Paleontology 56, 1302–5.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1985. On the identity of Trematopsis seltini (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) from the Lower Permian of Texas. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1985, 357367.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1986. Dissorophoid amphibians from the Upper Carboniferous of Nýřany. In Roček, Z. (ed.) Studies in herpetology, 671674. Prague.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1990. The radiations of temnospondyl amphibians. In Taylor, P. D. & Larwood, G. P. (eds) Major evolutionary radiations, 321349. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 2003a. Longiscitula houghae Demar 1966 (Amphibia: Temnospondyli), a junior synonym of Dissorophus multicinctus Cope 1895. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23, 941–4.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 2003b. Before the Rotliegendes – the Nýřany tetrapod fauna. 112113. In Biodiversität. Exogene & endogene Hintergründe. Terra Nostra 2003(5), 1–288.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 2007. Mordex and the base of the Trematopidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27, suppt to no.3 (Abstracts of papers), 118A.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. & Sequeira, S. E. K. 2003. On the taxonomic status of the species of Limnerpeton Fritsch, 1881 (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) from the Late Carboniferous of the Czech Republic. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48, 3150.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1941. The family Trematopsidae. Journal of Geology 49, 149176.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1956. Fauna of the Vale and Choza: 12. A new trematopsid amphibian from the Vale Formation. Fieldiana: Geology 10, 323338.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1970. Trematops stonei sp. nov. (Temnospondyli: Amphibia) from the Washington Formation, Dunkard Group, Ohio. Kirtlandia 8, 112.Google Scholar
Opluštil, S., Martínek, K. & Tasáryova, Z. 2005. Facies and architectural analysis of fluvial deposits of the Nýřany Member and Týnec Formation (Westphalian D – Barruelian) in the Kladno-Rakovník and Pilsen basins. Bulletin of Geosciences 80, 4566.Google Scholar
Opluštil, S., Schmitz, M., Cleal, C. J. & Martínek, K. 2016. A review of the Middle-Late Pennsylvanian west European regional substages and floral biozones, and their correlation to the Geological Time Scale based on new U-Pb ages. Earth Science Reviews 154, 301335.Google Scholar
Polley, B. P. & Reisz, R. R. 2011. A new Lower Permian trematopid (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea from Richards Spur, Oklahoma. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 789815.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1947. Review of the Labyrinthodontia. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College 99, 1–368.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate paleontology, 3rd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Schoch, R. R. & Fröbisch, N. B. 2006. Metamorphosis and neoteny: alternative pathways in an extinct amphibian clade. Evolution 60, 14671475.Google Scholar
Schoch, R. R. & Milner, A. R. 2008. The intrarelationships and evolutionary history of the temnospondyl family Branchiosauridae. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6, 409431.Google Scholar
Schoch, R. R. & Milner, A. R. 2014. Part 3A2 Temnospondyli 1. In Sues, H.-D. (ed.) Handbook of paleoherpetology. Munich: Pfeil.Google Scholar
Sequeira, S. E. K. & Milner, A. R. 1993. The temnospondyl amphibian Capetus from the Upper Carboniferous of Nýřany, Czech Republic. Palaeontology 36, 657680.Google Scholar
Steen, M. C. 1938. On the fossil Amphibia from the Gas Coal of Nýřany and other deposits in Czechoslovakia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (B) 108, 205283.Google Scholar
Steindachner, F. 1899. Notizen. Jahresbericht für 1898. Annalen des kaiserlich königlichen naturhistorischen Hofmuseums XIV, 162.Google Scholar
Sumida, S. S., Berman, D. S. & Martens, T. 1998. A new trematopid amphibian from the Lower Permian of Central Germany. Palaeontology 41, 605629.Google Scholar
Vaughn, P. P. 1969. Further evidence of close relationship of the trematopsid and dissorophid labyrinthodont amphibians with a description of a new genus and a new species. Bulletin of the South California Academy of Sciences 68, 121130.Google Scholar
Vaughn, P. P. 1971. A Platyhystrix-like amphibian with fused vertebrae, from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology 45, 464469.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K. 1888. Handbuch der Paläontologie Abteilung 1. Paläozoologie Band III Vertebrata (Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves). Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Werneburg, R. 1987. Dissorophoiden (Amphibia, Rhachitomi) aus dem Westphal D (Oberkarbon) der ČSSR. Teil 1. Branchiosaurus salamandroides Fritsch 1876. Zeitschrift für geologische Wissenschaften 15, 681690.Google Scholar
Werneburg, R. 1991. Die Branchiosaurier aus dem Unterrotliegend des Döhlener Beckens bei Dresden. Veröffentlichungendes Naturhistorischen Museums Schleusingen 6, 7599.Google Scholar
Werneburg, R. 1994. Dissorophoiden (Amphibia, Rhachitomi) aus dem Westfal D (Oberkarbon) von Böhmen – Limnogyrinus elegans (Fritsch 1881). Zeitschrift für geologische Wissenschaften 22, 457467.Google Scholar
Werneburg, R. 2012. Dissorophoide amphibian aus dem Westphalian D (Ober-Karbon) von Nýřany in Böhmen (Tschechishe Republik) – der schlüssel zum verständnis der frühen ‘Branchiosaurier'. Semana 27, 350.Google Scholar
Williston, S. W. 1910. Cacops, Desmospondylus, new genera of Permian vertebrates. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 21, 249284.Google Scholar
Witzmann, F. 2013. Phylogenetic patterns of character evolution in the Hyobranchial apparatus of early tetrapods. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104, 145167.Google Scholar
Witzmann, F. & Schoch, R. R. 2006. Skeletal development of the temnospondyl Acanthostomatops vorax from the Lower Permian Döhlen Basin of Saxony. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 96 (for 2005), 365385.Google Scholar