Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:54:14.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality Controlled Radiocarbon Dating of Bones and Charcoal from the Early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) of Motza (Israel)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Meirav Yizhaq
Affiliation:
Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Genia Mintz
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Environmental Science and Energy Research Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Illit Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Hamudi Khalaily
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, P.O. Box 586, Jerusalem, 91004, Israel
Steve Weiner
Affiliation:
Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Elisabetta Boaretto*
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Environmental Science and Energy Research Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
*
Corresponding author. Email: Elisabetta.Boaretto@weizmann.ac.il.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dating of early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) deposits at the site of Motza, Israel, was achieved by first prescreening many charcoal and bone samples in order to identify those that are in the most suitable state of preservation for dating. For assessing bone preservation, we determined the collagen contents, and by infrared spectroscopy the collagen purity. The collagen samples of the best preserved bones were then further characterized by their C/N ratios and amino acid compositions. Prescreening of the charcoal samples involved monitoring the changes in infrared and Raman spectra during the acid-alkali-acid treatments. In some samples, we noted that the clay content increased with additional alkali treatments. These samples were rejected, as this could result in erroneous dates. No differences were observed in the 14C dates between charcoal and bone collagen samples. The dates range from 10,600–10,100 cal BP, which is consistent with dates for the early PPNB from other sites. This is of much interest in terms of better understanding where and when domestication of animals began in this period, and how agriculture spread throughout the Levant.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Alon, D, Mintz, G, Cohen, I, Weiner, S, Boaretto, E. 2002. The use of Raman spectroscopy to monitor the removal of humic substances from charcoal: quality control for 14C dating of charcoal. Radiocarbon 44(1):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H, Mackey, J. 1963. British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements IV. Radiocarbon 5:104–8.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. 1981. The “Pre Pottery Neolithic” period in the southern Levant. In: Cauvin, J, Sanlaville, P, editors. Préhistoire du Levant. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique. p 551–70.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O, Alon, D. 1988. Excavations in the Nahal Hemar Cave. Atiqot 18:130.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. 2001. The world around Cyprus: from Epi-Paleolithic foragers to the collapse of the PPNB civilization. In: Swiny, S, editor. The Earliest Prehistory of Cyprus from Colonization to Exploitation. Boston: American Schools of Oriental Research. p 129–64.Google Scholar
Blong, RJ, Gillespie, R. 1978. Fluvially transported charcoal gives erroneous 14C ages for recent deposits. Nature 271:739–41.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Bowles, A, Hedges, R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1988. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171–7.Google Scholar
Carmi, I, Segal, D. 1992. Rehovot radiocarbon measurements IV. Radiocarbon 34(1):115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauvin, J. 1979. Les fouilles de Mureybet (1971–1974) et leur signification pour les origines de la sedentarisation au Proche-Orient. In: Freedman, DN, editor. Annual of American Schools of Oriental Research 44:1948.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J. 1987. Chronologie relative et absolue dans le Neolithique du Levant Nord et d'Anatolie entre 10,000 et 8000 BP. In: Aurenche, O, Evin, J, Hours, F, editors. Chronologies in the Near East: Relative Chronologies and Absolute Chronology 16,000–4000 BP. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 379:325–42.Google Scholar
Crane, HR, Griffin, JB. 1970. University of Michigan radiocarbon dates XIII. Radiocarbon 12(1):161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delibrias, G, Guillier, MT, Labeyrie, J. 1982. GIF natural radiocarbon measurements IX. Radiocarbon 24(3):291343.Google Scholar
DeNiro, MJ, Weiner, S. 1988a. Chemical, enzymatic and spectroscopic characterization of “collagen” and other organic fractions from prehistoric bones. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52:2197–206.Google Scholar
DeNiro, MJ, Weiner, S. 1988b. Organic matter within crystalline aggregates of hydroxyapatite: a new substrate for stable isotopic and possibly other bio-geochemical analyses of bone. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52:2415–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, HL, Barendsen, GW. 1954. Measurements of age by the carbon-14 technique. Nature 174:1138–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, S, Robinson, RA, Schofield, B. 1976. Morphology of bone and histochemical staining characteristics of bone cells. In: Aurbach, GD, editor. Handbook of Physiology. Washington, DC: American Physiology Society. p 323 Google Scholar
Edwards, PC, Falconer, SE, Fall, PL, Berelov, I, Davis, C, Meadows, J, Meegan, C, Metzger, MC, Sayej, G. 2001. Archaeology and environment of the Dead Sea plain: preliminary results of the first season of investigations by the joint La Trobe University/Arizona State University project. Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 45:135–57.Google Scholar
Gopher, A. 1994. Arrowheads of the Neolithic Levant: A Seriation Analysis. American Schools of Oriental Research Dissertation Series 10. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. 325 p.Google Scholar
Gopher, A. 1996. What happened to the EPPNB? In: Kozlowski, SK, Gebel, HGK, editors. Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, and Their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions. Berlin: Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 3. p 443–52.Google Scholar
Goring-Moris, N, Belfer-Cohen, A. 1998. The articulation of cultural processes and late Quaternary environmental changes in Cisjordan. Paleorient 23:7193.Google Scholar
Hattè, C, Morvan, J, Noury, C, Paterne, M. 2001. Is classical acid-alkali-acid treatment responsible for contamination? An alternative proposition. Radiocarbon 43(2A):177–82.Google Scholar
Jöris, O, Fernández, E, Weninger, B. 2003. Radiocarbon evidence of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in southwestern Europe. Trabajos de Prehistoria 60:1538.Google Scholar
Kuijt, I. 2003. Between foraging and farming; critically evaluating the archaeological evidence for the southern Levantine early Pre-Pottery Neolithic period. Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology 6:725.Google Scholar
Kuijt, I, Goring-Morris, N. 2002. Foraging, farming, and complexity in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the southern Levant: a review and synthesis. Journal of World Prehistory 16:361440.Google Scholar
Law, IA, Hedges, REM. 1989. A semi-automated bone pretreatment of older and contaminated samples. Radiocarbon 31(3):247–53.Google Scholar
Mook, WG, Waterbolk-Groningen, HT. 1985. Handbooks for Archaeologists Number 3, Radiocarbon Dating. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Rollefson, GO. 1998. The Aceramic Neolithic. In: Henry, DO, editor. The Prehistoric Archaeology of Jordan. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 705:102–26.Google Scholar
Stafford, TW, Jull, AJT, Brendel, K, Duhamel, RC, Donahue, D. 1987. Study of bone radiocarbon dating accuracy at the University of Arizona NSF Accelerator Facility for Radioisotope Analysis. Radiocarbon 29(1):2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuckenrath, R, Lawn, B. 1969. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates XI. Radiocarbon 11(1):150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. IntCal 98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041–84.Google Scholar
Tuinstra, F, Koenig, JL. 1970. Raman spectra of graphite. Journal of Chemical Physics 53:1126–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, GJ. 1999. Bone collagen quality indicators for paleodietary and radiocarbon measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:687–95.Google Scholar
Weiner, S, Bar-Yosef, O. 1990. State of preservation of bones from prehistoric sites in the Near East: a survey. Journal of Archaeological Science 17:187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyckoff, RWG. 1972. The Biochemistry of Animal Fossils. Bristol: Scientechnica LTD. 152 p.Google Scholar
Yang, Y, Wang, T. 1997. Fourier transform Raman spectroscopic characterization of humic substances. Vibrational Spectroscopy 14:105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yizhaq, M. 2004. Characterizing and dating the early PPNB layer at the site of Motza [M.Sc. thesis]. Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.Google Scholar
Zhiyu, G, Kexin, L, Xiangyang, L, Hongji, M, Kun, L, Sixum, Y. 2000. The use of AMS radiocarbon dating for Xia-Shang-Zhou chronology. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:72–31.Google Scholar
Zilhão, J, d'Errico, F. 1999. The chronology and taphonomy of the earliest Aurignacian and its implications for the understanding of Neanderthal extinction. Journal of World Prehistory 13:168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziv, V. 1991. Crystal sizes in normal and osteopetrotic rat bone [M.Sc. thesis]. Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.Google Scholar