Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:51:05.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Tools for the Economic Historian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

E. A. J. Johnson
Affiliation:
New York University

Extract

Archeologists assure us that organized social life has existed on this earth for about two hundred and fifty thousand years. How millions of people have sought to satisfy their wants over this tremendous span of time is the acknowledged province of economic history. Yet, for lack of records, the gild of economic historians must, for the most part, confine their attention to the last one per cent of this time span; indeed the great bulk of research in economic history is devoted the last one-tenth of one per cent of the archeologists' two hundred and fifty thousand years of social history. Even then the economic historian is utterly overwhelmed with facts. He who essays to write the economic history of the United States, for example, must depict as best can the economic activities of people for more than a hundred and fifty years, farmers, merchants, manufacturers, wage-earners, rentiers; men, women and children in all walks of life, in all variety of occupations. The task is utterly staggering. An army of economic historians would be required to write a complete economic history of the United States; a regiment at least to write a faithful factual account of a single industry.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Independence Convergence and Borrowing (Cambridge, 1937), 4457Google Scholar.

2 See, especially The Danube in Prehistory (Oxford, 1929)Google Scholar.

3 Railways and Roads in Pioneer Development Overseas: A Study of Comparative Economics (London, 1934)Google Scholar.

4 Mercantilism (London, 1935), II, 53 ffGoogle Scholar.

5 For specific criticism, see my Predecessors of Adam Smith (New York, 1937), 12, 111, 237, 238, 249, 319 nGoogle Scholar.