Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T15:53:28.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hauran Conflicts of the 1860s: A Chapter in the Rural History of Modern Syria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

L. Schatkowski Schilcher
L. Schatkowski Schilcher
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper examines the relatively neglected rural history of Syria. It concentrates on the Hauran, a dry-farming region of hills and plains south of the Damascene oasis between the northern Jordan's tributaries and the eastern desert. Although the Hauran is today no longer a region of primary economic importance to Syria as it once was, it is of historical interest because it was the very first of greater Syria's outlying rural zones to be integrated into the developing modern Middle Eastern economy.

The Hauran is, moreover, of comparative interest because it held a position in Syria's political economy then which bears many resemblances to the positions held by younger hinterland regions now. The parallels between the situation of the Hauran then and the Syrian north and northeast now, for example, are indeed many.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 1981 , pp. 159 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Author's note: I am grateful to the Volkswagen Foundation for its support during the completion of this paper.

1 This area includes, in addition to the Hauran plain itself, areas bordering on it such as Jabal al- 'Arab (or as it may also be called, Jabal Hauran or Jabal ad-Druz), Safa, Laja, Jaidur, Jaulan, and to some extent the Balqa' of transjordan which were all drawn into developments in the nineteenth century.

2 Through the Hauran still “feeds” Damascus, its importance to the national economy has been surpassed by more recently developed areas, first in the vicinity of Hama, Homa, and Aleppo and now by the vast regions in Syria's northeast. The Hauran's potential for further economic development in twentieth-century Syria has been limited by its continued dependence on rain and subsoil water resources. It has also suffered economically by the placement of international borders through its interdependent districts, the loss of Palestine as an alternative market to Damascus, and the loss of Haifa as its most economic outlet to the Mediterranean. The Hauran like all regions of southern Syria and Lebanon suffer from the generally insecure political situation as a consequence of the Middle East conflict.

3 The Hauran and its surrounding districts have drawn the interest of several commentators, travelers, and historians of the later Ottoman period, but none has dealt in depth with the events of the 1860s nor considered the important roles played both by European economic interests and Damascenes at that time. Reference could be made to the following: Hanna, Abu Rashid, Hauran ad-Damiyya (Cairo, 1926)Google Scholar and Jabal ad-Druz (Beirut, 1961);Google ScholarShibli, al-'Aysami, Da', ud Nimr, and Hamud, ash-Shufi, Muhafaza as-Suwayda' (Damascus, 1962);Google ScholarGertrude, Bell, Syria: The Desert and the Sown (London, 1907);Google ScholarLady, Ann Blunt, The Bedouin Tribes of the Euphrates (New York, 1879);Google ScholarBrönnow, R. E. and Von Domaszewski, A., Die Provincia Arabia, Bd. 3, Der westliche Hauran (Strassburg, 1909);Google ScholarRichard, F. Burton and Trywitt Drake, F., Unexplored Syria (London, 1872);Google ScholarDelbet, E. M., “Paysans en communauté et en polygamie de Bousrah,” in Le, Play, Les Ouvriers de l'Orient (Tours, 1877), pp. 304–397;Google ScholarYa', akov Firestone, “Production and Trade in an Islamic Context: Sharika Contracts in the Transitional Economy of Northern Samaria,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 6 (1975) 185–209, 308–325;Google Scholar'Abdullah, Hanna, al-Qadiya az-Zira'iyya wa'l-Harakat al-Falahiyya fi Suriyya wa Lubnan, 1820–1920 (Beirut, 1975);Google Scholar'Umar, Rida Kahhala, Mu'jam Qaba'il al-'Arab al-Qadima wa'l-Haditha (Beirut, 1968);Google ScholarSafuh, Khayr, Iqlim Jaulan (Damascus, 1976);Google ScholarLees, G.R., “Across Southern Bashan,” Geographical Journal, 5 (1895) 1–27;CrossRefGoogle ScholarDavid, McDowell, “The Druze Revolt of 1925 and Its Background in the Late Ottoman Period,” unpublished B.Litt. Thesis (Oxford, 1972);Google ScholarJoyce, Laverty Miller, “The Syrian Revolt of 1925,” in International Journal of Middle East Studies, 8 (1977) 545–563;Google ScholarIhsan, anNimr, Tarikh Jabal Nablus wa'l-Balqa' (Nablus, 1961);Google ScholarJean-Paul, Pascual, “Environnement et alimentation dans la Hawran au XIXàme siàle,” unpublished French version now available in Arabic translation in al-Mu' tamar ad-Dauli ath-Thani li Tarikh Bilad ash-Sham, Vol. 1 (Damascus, 1980) 415–428;Google ScholarPorter, J. L., The Giant Cities of Bashan (London, 1867);Google ScholarMax, von Oppenheim, Die Beduinnen (Leipzig, 1943) and his Vom Mittelmeer zum persischen Golf (Berlin, 1899);Google ScholarAnon, , Rambles in the Deserts of Syria (London, 1864);Google ScholarEmanuel, Guillaume Rey, Voyage dans le Hauran et aux Bords de la Mer Morte (Paris, 1860);Google ScholarSchumacher, G., The Jaulan (London, 1888);Google ScholarWetzstein, J.G., Reisebericht öber den Hauran und die Trachonen (Berlin, 1860).Google Scholar

4 For more on Ottoman policy witn special reterence to Syria see:'Abd, al-'Aziz 'Awad, al-Idaru al'Uthmaniyya fi Wilayat Suriya (Cairo, 1964);Google ScholarButrus, Abu Manneh, “Some Aspects of Ottoman Rule in Syria in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century: Reforms, Islam and Caliphate,” unpublished D.Phil Thesis (Oxford, 1971);Google ScholarMoshe, Ma' oz, Ottoman Reform in Syria and Palestine, 1840–1861 (Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar

5 See also: Muhammad, Said Kalla, “The Role of Foreign Trade in the Economic Development of Syria 1831–1914,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis (American University, Washington, 1969);Google ScholarSchatkowski-Schilcher, L., “Ein Modellfall indirekter wirtschaftlicher Durchdringung: Das Beispiel Syrien,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 1 (1975), 482–505;Google ScholarBadr, ad-Din as-Siba'i, Adwa' 'ala alrasmal al-ajnabi fi suriyah 1850–1958, (Damascus, 1967).Google Scholar

6 Şerif, Mardin, The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought (Princeton, 1962), p. 3.Google Scholar

7 For reference to a number of these travelers' reports, see n. 3 above.

8 Wrench, , 2, 01 10, 1861, F0195/677; 3, Jan. 24, 1861, FO195/677; 7, Feb. 25, 1861, F0195/677. (European archival materials used here have been drawn from the Consular dispatches from Damascus now available in the British Public Record Office, Series F.O. 195 (cited here as FO195) and in the Archives du Ministàre des Affaires Etrangàres, Correspondance Politique et Commerciale du Consulat de Damas (cited here as AEPol and AECom, respectively) and in the Archives Réintégrées de Constantinople (AEARC). The references to these archives give the name of the reporting consul, the number and date of his dispatch, and the British or French archival reference.)Google Scholar

9 Wrench, , 10, 04 4, 1861, FO195/677.Google Scholar

10 Ibid.

11 Ottoman troops were camped at Ayn Tayba, Jdayda, Ashrafiya, Hajani, Harjalla, Artuz, Dayr al-Kabiya, Bayt Sadar, Kaswa and Qatana (Outrey, 29, Jan. 30, 1861, AEARC/13/4).

12 Wrench, , 9 03 20, 1861, Fo195/677.Google Scholar The aghawat troops are often referred to by the European consuls as “bashi bozuks,” the pejorative the Ottoman irregular forces acquired during the Crimean War. On the whole, the consuls referred to the aghawāt troops in a disparaging manner. For example, Rogers wrote: “The officers in command of these troops are generally disreputable military adventurers or warlike chiefs of districts who have — by inheritance or by personal intimidation — obtained a reputation for bravery in the district to which they belong. The Boshi Bozuk Officer has his partisans amongst the Arab tribes, declares war or makes peace with them as he may conceive it to be more conductive to his interest or to his personal aggrandisement, and is only ostensibly subject to local authority,” (Rogers, , 37, 08 20, 1861, FO195/677).Google Scholar

13 Wrench, , 9, 03 20, 1861, FO195/677, and 12, 04 9, 1861, FO195/677.Google Scholar

14 Outrey, , 129, 01 30, 1861, AEARC/93/4.Google Scholar

15 Wrench, , 12, 04 19, 1861, FO195/677.Google Scholar

16 Lanusse, , 3 03 27, 1862, AEARC/93/5.Google Scholar

17 Rogers, , 23, 07 31, FO195/677.Google Scholar

18 For material on Ahmad Agha al-Yusuf and his family, see 'Abd, al-Qadir Badran, al-Kawakib adh-Dhurriyya fi Ta'rikh 'Abd al-Rahman Basha al- Yusuf (Damascus, 1920);Google ScholarQustantin, al-Basha, ed., Mudhakkirat Ta'rikhiya (Harisa, n.d.), pp. 177n, 235–236, 240;Google ScholarMuhammad, Al Taqi ad-Din, Kitab Muntakhabat at-Tawarikh li Dimashq (Damascus, 1927), pp. 851–853;Google ScholarMuhammad, Jamil ash-Shatti, Tarajim a'yan Dimashq fi Nisf al-Qarn ar-Rabi''Ashar al-Hijri, 1301–1350 (Damascus, 1948), pp. 59–61;Google ScholarTresse, R., Le Pàlerinage Syrien (Paris, 1937), pp. 85–86.Google Scholar

19 Hecquard, , 1, 01 4, 1863, AEPo1/7.Google Scholar

20 See above pp. 3–7.

21 Hecquard, , I, 04 10, 1862, AEARC/93/5; 3, Apr. 17, 1862, AEARC/93/5; 2, Apr. 21, 1862, AEPol/6.Google Scholar

22 Hecquard, , 7, 06 1, 1862, AEPol/7. If a “measure” here means a “kilé de Constantinople,” the usual measure at this time, this would have been equivalent to 10,000 metric tons, a considerable amount when one considers that the average export for the entire Syrian coast in the 1860s stood at 10,000 tons.Google Scholar

23 Ibid. 2, Apr. 21, 1862, AEPol/6.

24 Ibid., 8, June 30, 1862, AEPol/7; 9, July 10, 1862, AEPol/7; 11, June 11, 1862. AEARC/93/5;1, Jan. 4, 1863, AEPol/7.

25 Ibid., 7, Mar. 19, 1863, AEPol/7.

26 Ibid., 7, June 15, 1862, AEPol/7; 4, May 6, 1862, AEPol/7.

27 Ibid.

28 Ibid., 2, Apr. 21, 1862, AEPol/7.

29 Ibid., 2, Apr. 21, 1862, AEPol/7; 6, May 31, 1862, AEPol/7.

30 Ibid.

31 Ibid., 6, May 31, 1862, AEPol/7.

32 Ibid.

33 Ibid.

34 Ibid., 7, June 15, 1862, AEPol/7.

35 Ibid., 14, July 3, 1862, AEARC/93/5.

36 Rogers, , 7 07 10, 1862, FO195/727;Google ScholarHecquard, , 9, 07 10, 1862, AEPol/7; 10, 07 24, 1862, AEPol/7; 11, 07 27, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

37 Hecquard, , 10, 07 24, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., 7, June 15, 1862; 11, July 27, 1862, AEPol/7.

39 Sandwith, , 13, 06 12, 1862, FO195/727;Google ScholarRogers, , 19, 07 28, 1862, FO195/727.Google Scholar

40 Sandwith, , 12, 05 29, 1862; 13, 06 12, 1862, FO195/727;Google ScholarHecquard, , 16, 08 25, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

41 Rogers, , 19, 07 28, 1862, FO195/727;Google ScholarHecquard, , 6, 08 25, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

42 Hecquard, , 16, 08 25, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., 20, Nov. 18, 1862, AEPol/7.

44 Rogers, , 26, 10 6, 1862, FO195/727;Google ScholarHecquard, , 21, 10 20, 1862, AEPol/7;Google ScholarRogers, , 22, 11 4, 1862, FO195/727.Google Scholar

45 Hecquard, , 21, 10 20, 1862; 24, 11 24, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., 23, Nov. 10, 1862, AEPol/7.

47 Ibid., 24, Nov. 24, 1862, AEPol/7.

48 Ibid.

49 Ibid., 23, Oct. 26, 1863, AECom/4. On Atrash tax-collection see Rogers, , 26, 10 6, 1862, FO195/727;Google ScholarHecquard, , 21, 10 20, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

50 Hecquard, , 1, 01 4, 1862, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

51 Rogers, , 01 15, 1863, FO195/760;Google ScholarHecquard, , 1, 01 4, 1862, AEPol/4.Google Scholar

52 Hecquard, , 1, 01 4, 1862, AEPol/4.Google Scholar

53 Ibid., 6, Nov. 6, 1863, AEPol/7.

54 Ibid.

55 Ibid.

56 Ibid., 9, Apr. 27, 1863, AEPol/7.

57 Ibid., 17, Aug. 5, 1863, AEPol/8; 21, Aug. 21, 1863, AECom/4.

58 Rogers, , 01 15, 1863; 34, 06 24, 1863, FO195/760.Google Scholar

59 Hecquard, , 12, 05 25, 1863, AEPol/7.Google Scholar

60 Ibid., 20, Sept. 4, 1863, AEPol/8.

61 For the intrigues of Mustafa Fazil Pasha in which O'Reilly confessed his involvement, see O'Reilly's statement enclosed (but not bound) in FO195/806; and in Gay, de Tunis09 20, 1868, AEPol/10.Google Scholar

62 Hecquard, , 14, 06 24, 1864, AEPol/8.Google Scholar

63 Rogers, , 11, 03 21, 1866, FO195/806.Google Scholar

64 Hecquard, , 07 20, 1866, AEPol/9.Google Scholar

65 Rogers, , 33, 07 22, 1863, FO195/760.Google Scholar

66 Hecquard, , 15, 06 11, 1866, AEPol/9.Google Scholar

67 Ibid, 22, Oct. 5, 1863, AEPol/8; Eldridge, , 52, 09 28, 1864, FO195/787.Google Scholar

68 Rousseau, , 34, 02 27, 1860, AECom/4.Google Scholar

69 Syrian grain prices were reported regularly in the consular reports. For European prices see Die Getreidepreise im Deutschland seit dem Ausgang des 18. Jahrhunderrs (Berlin, 1935).Google Scholar

70 Hecquard, , 06 11, 1866, AECom/4 and 19, 06 11, 1866, AEPol/9.Google Scholar

71 Ibid.

72 Ibid., 17, Oct. 11, 1866, AECom/4.

73 Ibid., 17, July 20, 1866 and 19, Sept. 1, 1866, AEPol/9.

74 Ibid., 20, Sept. 11, 1866, AEPol/9.

75 Bertrand, , 1, 11 21, 1866, AEPol/9.Google Scholar

76 Ibid., 2, Dec. 1, 1866, AEPol/9.

77 Wood, , 10 26, 1869, FO195/927.Google Scholar

78 Hecquard, , 19, 09 1, 1866, AEPol/9.Google Scholar

79 Wrench, , 01 1864, FO195/806.Google Scholar

80 Roustan, , 7, 03 1869, AEPol/10.Google Scholar

81 Rousseau, , 15, 09 28, 1867, AEPol/9;Google ScholarWood, , 15, 09 28, 1869, FO195/927.Google Scholar

82 Bertrand, , 5, 01 21, 1867”, AEPol/9;Google ScholarRoustan, , 8, 03 20, 1969.Google Scholar

83 Hecquard, , 17, 07 20, 1866, AEPol/9;Google ScholarRogers, , 27, 05 7, 1867 FO195/806;Google ScholarEldridge, , 64 (from Beirut), 09. 30, 1868, FO195/903.Google Scholar

84 Eldridge, , 64, 09 30, 1868, FO195/903, and his (from Beirut) 29, 08 2, 1869; 30, 08 2, 1869, FO195/927;Google ScholarWood, , 5, 04 10, 1869, FO195/927;Google ScholarEldridge, (from Beirut) 7, 04, 1870;Google Scholar 17, May 21, 1870; 27, Aug. 11, 1870; 30, Aug. 27, 1870; 41, Nov. 5, 1870; 49, Dec. 16, 1870, FO195/ 965; Green, ,59, 12 12, 1873, FO195/1027;Google ScholarEldridge, , 18, 05 4, 1874,Google Scholar FO195/1047 and 31, June 20, 1874, FO195/1047; Robin, , 1, 04 18, 1872, AECom/5.Google Scholar

85 See sources cited in nn 78 and 79 above.

86 Wood, , 20, 10 26, 1869, FO195/927. The consul named among these visitors the contemporary Mufti of Damascus and some of the notables who had been exiled following the events of 1860 but who were now again in Damascus.Google Scholar

87 Ibid.

88 See Shibli, al-'Aysami et al. , Muhafaza as-Suwayda', pp. 65–74;Google Scholar'Abdullah, Hanna, al-Qadiyya az-Zira'iyya, pp. 175–183;Google ScholarDavid, McDowell, The Druze Revolt, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar