Elsevier

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volume 33, Issue 5, June–July 2001, Pages 438-444
Digestive and Liver Disease

Progress report
Treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: what is the best approach today?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(01)80018-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Liver is the common site for metastases from colorectal cancer. The 5-year overall survival rate of patients following radical operations is 25%. Surgery can be carried out in only 10–15% of the patients, yet it remains the potential curative treatment for resectable lesions. For the unresectable cancers, only chemotherapy is recommended. New drugs such as Irinotecan prolongs the overall survival of patients affected by advanced disease. In patients with unresectable metastases at diagnosis, pre-surgical treatment with Oxaliplatin leads to reduction of the lesions, allowing resection in 16% of cases. Chemotherapy may be delivered directly into the liver via the hepatic artery. No, clinical trials, to date, have shown convincing survival results in patients treated with this procedure. Combined hepatic artery and systemic treatment may provide a new strategy as adjuvant therapy for patients undergoing resections.

References (33)

  • J.P. Caussancl et al.

    Phase I trial of 5-day continuous venous infusion of oxaliplatin at circadian rhythm-modulated rate compared with constant-rate

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1990)
  • L.B. Saltz et al.

    Weekly irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and flurouracil (FU) is superior to daily x5 LV/FU in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer

  • Y.J. Douillard et al.

    Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter randomized trial

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • J.G. Geoghegan et al.

    Treatment of colorectal liver metastases

    Br J Surg

    (1999)
  • J. Belghiti et al.

    Portal triad clamping or hepatic vascular exclusion for major liver resection. A controlled study

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
  • B. Cady et al.

    The role of surgical resection of liver metastases in colorectal carcinoma

    Semin Oncol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (23)

    • The pre-operative rate of growth of colorectal metastases in patients selected for liver resection does not influence post-operative disease-free survival

      2016, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main finding of clinical significance from this study is that, in contrast to the treatment of many other solid tumours, and colorectal metastases in the lung, the rate of growth of CRLM has no influence on survival after resection. The proportion of patients with CRLM who are offered liver resection is small (10–20%)32,33 and patients undergo a selection process before being offered liver resection. In the majority of cases this involves exclusion of patients with extra-hepatic disease, rapidly progressive disease and where there is extensive replacement of the liver with tumour.

    • Socioeconomic status influences the likelihood but not the outcome of liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis

      2015, HPB
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients with primary colorectal cancer often present symptomatically and are at risk of colonic obstruction, and population studies have shown that 60–80% of patients with primary colorectal cancer will be offered surgery.9 However, the proportion of patients with CLM who are offered surgery is far lower, at 10–20%.10,11 Patients who develop CLM must overcome a number of potential obstacles before undergoing liver surgery.

    • Vaccination with in vitro grown whole tumor cells induces strong immune responses and retards tumor growth in a murine model of colorectal liver metastases

      2008, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The remaining >75% can be treated by systemic chemotherapy, which is regarded as only palliative [4,5]. Patients treated with surgical resection in combination with adjuvant treatment have significantly better tumor free survival rates compared to either modality alone [6–8]. However even the best combination treatment at this stage only offers a 20–40% 5-year survival [9], thus additional treatments are being sought.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text