Elsevier

The Surgeon

Volume 6, Issue 4, August 2008, Pages 222-231
The Surgeon

The role of imaging in the pre-operative staging and post-operative follow-up of rectal cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80032-7Get rights and content

Developments in rectal cancer imaging have revolutionised the management of this condition. It has become increasingly important for oncologists and surgeons to have a working insight into radiological assessment in order to make informed clinical decisions. In this context, we discuss the role that imaging plays in the pre-operative staging, post-operative follow-up and therapy of this disease including some novel advances in the field. Rectal cancer outcomes have improved due to modern surgical techniques, namely total mesorectal excision. Meticulous pre-operative assessment remains key. Conventional TNM staging now appears less crucial compared to assessing tumour distance from the potential plane of surgical resection (particularly the circumferential margin bounded by the mesorectal fascia), and this is reliant on high-quality imaging. Those with margin threatening disease can be offered downstaging chemoradiotherapy to facilitate successful resection. Endorectal ultrasound is useful for T staging and CT for detecting metastases. Malignant lymph node identification remains a problem and the use of size and morphological criteria may lead to misdiagnosis. In the post-operative setting, intensive follow-up is associated with improved outcomes but there are many variations in protocols. Most modalities struggle to differentiate tumour from reactive or fibrotic tissue and functional imaging is being investigated as the solution. PET scanning, particularly PET/CT, has been a major recent development. It has superior utility in detecting recurrent disease, including when conventional imaging is negative, detects occult metastases and may significantly enhance our ability to deliver accurate radiotherapy. Imaging has also opened up avenues for guided therapies aimed at ablating liver metastases. Radiofrequency ablation, in particular, is being used successfully and can improve survival of stage four patients.

References (90)

  • A Dzik-Jurasz et al.

    Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • JH Kim et al.

    High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size?

    Eur J Radiol

    (2004)
  • H Matsuoka et al.

    Preoperative staging by multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with rectal carcinoma

    Am J Surg

    (2002)
  • GB Secco et al.

    Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (2002)
  • D Schoemaker et al.

    Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients

    Gastroenterology

    (1998)
  • P Flamen

    Positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer

    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • C Schiepers et al.

    Contribution of PET in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional imaging

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (1995)
  • B Wiering et al.

    The impact of fluor-18-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metas-tases

    Cancer

    (2005)
  • JH Kim et al.

    Comparison between 18F-FDG PET, in-line PET/CT, and software fusion for restaging of recurrent colorectal cancer

    J Nucl Med

    (2005)
  • M Macmanus et al.

    Incorporating PET information into radiation therapy planning

    Biomed Imaging Interv J

    (2007)
  • H Bismuth et al.

    Resection of non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
    H Bismuth et al.

    Resection of non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
  • GD Dodd et al.

    Minimally invasive treatment of malignant hepatic tumors: at the threshold of a major breakthrough

    Radiographics

    (2000)
  • Cancer Research UK Cancer Statistics

  • Mountney L HJ. Oxford: Radcliffe...
  • G Salerno et al.

    Defining the rectum: surgically, radiologically and anatomically

    Colorectal Dis

    (2006)
  • A Wibe et al.

    A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer-implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (2002)
  • IP Bissett et al.

    Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (2001)
  • RG Beets-Tan et al.

    Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging

    Radiology

    (2004)
  • R Sauer et al.

    Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • MT Guerrero Urbano et al.

    Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer reduces volume of bowel treated to high dose levels

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • C Guinet et al.

    Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer

    Arch Surg

    (1990)
  • G Brown et al.

    Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging

    Br J Surg

    (2003)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study

    BMJ

    (2006)
  • G Brown

    Thin section MRI in multidisciplinary pre-operative decision making for patients with rectal cancer

    Br J Radiol

    (2005)
  • G Brown et al.

    Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison

    Radiology

    (2003)
  • CC Chen et al.

    How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (2005)
  • KT Hoffmann et al.

    Restaging of locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum with MR imaging after preoperative radio-chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia

    Strahlenther Onkol

    (2002)
  • M Taupitz et al.

    [Superparamagnetic iron oxide particles: current state and future development]

    Rofo

    (2003)
  • DM Koh et al.

    Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings-initial observations

    Radiology

    (2004)
  • N Rieger et al.

    Endoanal and endorectal ultrasound: applications in colorectal surgery

    ANZ J Surg

    (2004)
  • S Sengupta et al.

    Local excision of rectal cancer: what is the evidence?

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (2001)
  • AG Maier et al.

    Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • FJ Hulsmans et al.

    Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with tran-srectal sonography: caution is necessary

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • SG Mackay et al.

    Assessment of the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography in anorectal neoplasia

    Br J Surg

    (2003)
  • JB Kruskal et al.

    Pitfalls and sources of error in staging rectal cancer with endorectal us

    Radiographics

    (1997)
  • Cited by (33)

    • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Colorectal Cancer: 2021 Update

      2022, Journal of the American College of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Detection of lymph node involvement with TRUS is limited to mesorectal nodes in the immediate vicinity of the tumor, which limits sensitivity. The sensitivity ranges from 45% to 74% [63,64], and overall accuracy ranges from 62% to 83% [22]. Although TRUS can frequently be used to detect regional lymph nodes, it has not been shown to be predictive of the histology of the visualized lymph nodes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text