Review
Chemokine receptor antagonism as an approach to anti-inflammatory therapy: ‘just right’ or plain wrong?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00351-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Inflammation plays a pivotal role in exacerbating a wide array of human diseases. The chemokines are a group of proteins that control the movement and activation of the immune cells involved in all aspects of the inflammatory response. Recently, their cognate receptors have attracted considerable interest as therapeutic targets, in part because they are G-protein-coupled receptors, which have been antagonized successfully before by the pharmaceutical industry. Indeed, several companies have now reported the development of selective small-molecule chemokine receptor antagonists, and some of these compounds have even entered human Phase I clinical trials. Preclinical studies of the responsiveness of murine models of inflammation to either pharmacologic or genetic intervention have suggested that antagonism of some chemokine receptors may well prove to be a safe and efficacious approach to anti-inflammatory therapy.

Introduction

The inflammatory response has traditionally been considered the driving force primarily for diseases that seem immediately connected to the immune system: allo/xenograft rejection (chronic and acute), hypersensitivity states (asthma, allergic rhinitis) and autoimmune disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis). Recently, our understanding of pathophysiology has expanded to reveal that an inflammatory response plays a key role in other diseases, such as atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease, and also causes excessive damage in an otherwise appropriate response to foreign pathogens (e.g. the response to tuberculosis). Thus, it is clear that there is a pressing medical need for therapeutic agents that either prevent or control inflammation.

Historically, our inability to deal directly with the constellation of antigenic immune ‘triggers’ has led us to try to dampen the inflammatory response itself. Most anti-inflammatory drugs have targeted mechanisms that were too fundamental or too ancillary, thereby rendering the drugs either broadly immunosuppressive (e.g. steroids, cyclosporine) or capable of doing little other than to manage disease symptoms (antihistamines, COX-2 inhibitors). The search for Goldilocks’ drug — the one that balances efficacy and selectivity and is ‘just right’ — has gone unrewarded thus far.

The chemokines (chemotactic cytokines) are a group of small (8–14 kDa) proteins that are firmly entangled in the immunological web of heterogeneity, and chemokine research has provided important advances in our understanding of the biochemical mechanisms of human immunity [1]. Given that individual chemokines play a role in both cell movement and cell activation (Fig. 1), it might be expected that chemokine antagonism would be efficacious. Moreover, because chemokines and their receptors are frequently localized to specific cell types, immunological functions, and even anatomical/physiological compartments, chemokine antagonism also holds out the promise of selective immune regulation. This review surveys the recent biological and chemical developments relevant to antagonizing chemokine networks as a modern approach to anti-inflammatory therapy. In the interest of space, the potential roles of chemokine receptors as targets for the treatment of HIV infection [2•] or cancer 3•., 4. are not considered here.

Section snippets

Chemokine redundancy and specificity: the receptors are the targets

Even a brief survey of the chemokine literature reveals the complexity of the chemokine system: there are at least 18 chemokine receptors and over 45 chemokine ligands. In addition, significant promiscuity exists in the chemokine binding within the family (see Table 1; for a review of chemokine nomenclature, see [5]). Nonetheless, there are several chemokines that only bind to one receptor, and there are even a few receptors that only bind to one ligand (Table 1). Understanding the relative

Small-molecule chemokine inhibitors

The interest in chemokine receptors as therapeutic targets has placed a review of the patent literature outside the scope of this article. Fortunately, the past year has seen the disclosure of several small-molecule inhibitors of chemokine receptors in the peer-reviewed literature (Fig. 3). A majority (>80%) of the molecules contain either a piperidine or piperazine (115, Fig. 3) and at least two aromatic rings. Compounds from this piperidine/piperazine class are typically of higher molecular

Conclusion

While some of the data reviewed above suggest that chemokine receptors are reasonable therapeutic targets for inflammation, the ultimate proof of chemokine receptor antagonism will be derived from the results of human clinical trials. In this context, it is worth recalling the profound clinical failure of platelet-activating factor antagonists 148., 149., because, at the time of its identification, platelet-activating factor was considered to be one of the most important inflammatory and

Update

Recent reports from Bristol-Myers Squibb [173•] and Roche [174•] have highlighted the structures and in vitro potencies of two other classes of benzylpiperidine-containing CCR3 antagonists. A separate study has extended the understanding of the relationship between the secondary structure of an SDF-1 fragment and its biological activity [175].

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges Qihong Zhao, Paul Davies, and Robert Cherney for their critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (175)

  • H. Nakamura et al.

    Variant eotaxin: its effects on the asthma phenotype

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2001)
  • C. Agostini et al.

    CXCR3 and its ligand CXCL10 are expressed by inflammatory cells infiltrating lung allografts and mediate chemotaxis of T cells at sites of rejection

    Am J Pathol

    (2001)
  • T.L. Sorensen et al.

    Multiple sclerosis: a study of CXCL10 and CXCR3 co-localization in the inflamed central nervous system

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2002)
  • R.A. Kurt et al.

    Role of C chemokine lymphotactin in mediating recruitment of antigen-specific CD62Lo cells in vitro and in vivo

    Cell Immunol

    (2001)
  • B. Qiu et al.

    Chemokine expression dynamics in mycobacterial (type-1) and schistosomal (type-2) antigen-elicited pulmonary granuloma formation

    Am J Pathol

    (2001)
  • M. Wakugawa et al.

    CC chemokine receptor 4 expression on peripheral blood CD4+ T cells reflects disease activity of atopic dermatitis

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2001)
  • E.J. Kunkel et al.

    Chemokines and the tissue-specific migration of lymphocytes

    Immunity

    (2002)
  • K.A. Papadakis et al.

    CCR9-positive lymphocytes and thymus-expressed chemokine distinguish small bowel from colonic Crohn's disease

    Gastroenterology

    (2001)
  • J.M. Perez-Canadillas et al.

    NMR solution structure of murine CCL20/MIP-3α, a chemokine that specifically chemoattracts immature dendritic cells and lymphocytes through its highly specific interaction with the β

    chemokine receptor CCR6.

    (2001)
  • D.N. Cook et al.

    CCR6 mediates dendritic cell localization, lymphocyte homeostasis, and immune responses in mucosal tissue

    Immunity

    (2000)
  • R. Forster et al.

    CCR7 coordinates the primary immune response by establishing functional microenvironments in secondary lymphoid organs

    Cell

    (1999)
  • J.E. Bird et al.

    Increased severity of glomerulonephritis in CC chemokine receptor 2 knockout mice

    Kidney Int

    (2000)
  • C.R. Mackay

    Chemokines: immunology's high impact factors

    Nat Immunol

    (2001)
  • J.M. Strizki et al.

    SCH-C (SCH 351125), an orally bioavailable, small molecule antagonist of the chemokine receptor CCR5, is a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 infection in vitro and in vivo

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2001)
  • A. Muller et al.

    Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis

    Nature

    (2001)
  • B. Homey et al.

    Chemokines: agents for the immunotherapy of cancer?

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2002)
  • L. Del Rio et al.

    CXCR2 deficiency confers impaired neutrophil recruitment and increased susceptibility during Toxoplasma gondii infection

    J Immunol

    (2001)
  • L.R. Hall et al.

    CXC chemokine receptor 2 but not C-C chemokine receptor 1 expression is essential for neutrophil recruitment to the cornea in helminth-mediated keratitis (river blindness)

    J Immunol

    (2001)
  • T. Kielian et al.

    CXC chemokine receptor-2 ligands are required for neutrophil-mediated host defense in experimental brain abscesses

    J Immunol

    (2001)
  • R.L. Auten et al.

    Nonpeptide CXCR2 antagonist prevents neutrophil accumulation in hyperoxia-exposed newborn rats

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2001)
  • H.M. Sarau et al.

    Interleukin-8 receptor (CXCR2) antagonists

    Prog Respir Res

    (2001)
  • J.M. Schuh et al.

    CXCR2 is necessary for the development and persistence of chronic fungal asthma in mice

    J Immunol

    (2002)
  • A. Zernecke et al.

    Combinatorial model of chemokine involvement in glomerular monocyte recruitment: role of CXC chemokine receptor 2 in infiltration during nephrotoxic nephritis

    J Immunol

    (2001)
  • Y. Huo et al.

    The chemokine KC, but not monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, triggers monocyte arrest on early atherosclerotic endothelium

    J Clin Invest

    (2001)
  • T. Kurihara et al.

    Defects in macrophage recruitment and host defense in mice lacking the CCR2 chemokine receptor

    J Exp Med

    (1997)
  • L. Boring et al.

    Impaired monocyte migration and reduced type 1 (Th1) cytokine responses in CC chemokine receptor 2 knockout mice

    J Clin Invest

    (1997)
  • W.A. Kuziel et al.

    Severe reduction in leukocyte adhesion and monocyte extravasation in mice deficient in CC chemokine receptor 2

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1997)
  • L. Izikson et al.

    Resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice lacking the CC chemokine receptor (CCR)2

    J Exp Med

    (2000)
  • B.T. Fife et al.

    CC chemokine receptor 2 is critical for induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

    J Exp Med

    (2000)
  • J.A. Belperio et al.

    Critical role for the chemokine MCP-1/CCR2 in the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

    J Clin Invest

    (2001)
  • W. Ni et al.

    New anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice

    Circulation

    (2001)
  • A. Kaufmann et al.

    Increase of CCR1 and CCR5 expression and enhanced functional response to MIP-1 alpha during differentiation of human monocytes to macrophages

    J Leukoc Biol

    (2001)
  • J.B. Rottman et al.

    Leukocyte recruitment during the onset of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis is CCR1 dependent

    Eur J Immunol

    (2000)
  • W. Gao et al.

    Targeting of the chemokine receptor CCR1 suppresses development of acute and chronic cardiac allograft rejection

    J Clin Invest

    (2000)
  • H.-J. Anders et al.

    A chemokine receptor CCR-1 antagonist reduces renal fibrosis after unilateral ureter ligation

    J Clin Invest

    (2002)
  • E.H. Tran et al.

    Induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 mice deficient in either the chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1.alpha. or its CCR5 receptor

    Eur J Immunol

    (2000)
  • Martin K, Heinzlmann M, Borchers R, Mack M, Loeschke K, Folwaczny, Delta32 mutation of the chemokine-receptor 5 gene in...
  • I. Zapico et al.

    CCR5 (chemokine receptor-5) DNA-polymorphism influences the severity of rheumatoid arthritis

    Genes Immun

    (2000)
  • C.A. Haskell et al.

    Targeted deletion of CX3CR1 reveals a role for fractalkine in cardiac allograft rejection

    J Clin Invest

    (2001)
  • D.N. Cook et al.

    Generation and analysis of mice lacking the chemokine fractalkine

    Mol Cell Biol

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text